東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring Police Legitimacy Through Procedurally Just Policing Practices in Agencies Using Screen-In and Screen-Out Procedures.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploring Police Legitimacy Through Procedurally Just Policing Practices in Agencies Using Screen-In and Screen-Out Procedures./
作者:	Justice, David William.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	167 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-08B.
標題:	Law enforcement. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28317409
ISBN:	9798569993147

Exploring Police Legitimacy Through Procedurally Just Policing Practices in Agencies Using Screen-In and Screen-Out Procedures.
Justice, David William.

Exploring Police Legitimacy Through Procedurally Just Policing Practices in Agencies Using Screen-In and Screen-Out Procedures. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 167 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: B.

Thesis (D.P.A.)--Walden University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Recently there have been widely publicized reports of distrust and a lack of perceived legitimacy in communities across the United States for the police agencies that serve them. Scholars have explored perceptions of police legitimacy and the role of procedural justice in police-community interactions; however, there is a dearth of information concerning the policies of law enforcement agencies using psychological assessments to screen-in or screen-out applicants and the manner in which those agencies serve the community. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore the manner in which one police agency using psychological assessments to screen applicants in and one using them to screen-out delivers police patrol services to the community and to discern any difference in procedurally just policing between them. The theoretical framework for this study was Lind and Tyler's theory of procedural justice. Research questions were focused on exploring the behaviors exhibited by patrol officers as being supportive of or obstructive to the antecedents of procedural justice. A mixed-methods research design was employed, using randomly sampled patrol officers from two randomly sampled police agencies. Body-worn camera video and ride-along were used to observe police-citizen interactions. Data from the observations were coded, categorized, and analyzed for emergent themes. These data were then quantitatively analyzed using SPSS (Version 25). Findings demonstrated a statistically significant and meaningful difference between agency types for procedurally just behaviors and citizen satisfaction. Implications for social change include changing law enforcement agencies' screening policies to one that screens in applicants supportive of procedurally just policing.

ISBN: 9798569993147Subjects--Topical Terms:

607408
Law enforcement.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Police hiring

Exploring Police Legitimacy Through Procedurally Just Policing Practices in Agencies Using Screen-In and Screen-Out Procedures.
LDR:03131nmm a2200433 4500 001 2344147
005 20230315113016.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798569993147
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28317409
035 $a AAI28317409
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Justice, David William. $3 3682889
245 1 0 $a Exploring Police Legitimacy Through Procedurally Just Policing Practices in Agencies Using Screen-In and Screen-Out Procedures.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 167 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Williams, Dianne.
502 $a Thesis (D.P.A.)--Walden University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Recently there have been widely publicized reports of distrust and a lack of perceived legitimacy in communities across the United States for the police agencies that serve them. Scholars have explored perceptions of police legitimacy and the role of procedural justice in police-community interactions; however, there is a dearth of information concerning the policies of law enforcement agencies using psychological assessments to screen-in or screen-out applicants and the manner in which those agencies serve the community. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore the manner in which one police agency using psychological assessments to screen applicants in and one using them to screen-out delivers police patrol services to the community and to discern any difference in procedurally just policing between them. The theoretical framework for this study was Lind and Tyler's theory of procedural justice. Research questions were focused on exploring the behaviors exhibited by patrol officers as being supportive of or obstructive to the antecedents of procedural justice. A mixed-methods research design was employed, using randomly sampled patrol officers from two randomly sampled police agencies. Body-worn camera video and ride-along were used to observe police-citizen interactions. Data from the observations were coded, categorized, and analyzed for emergent themes. These data were then quantitatively analyzed using SPSS (Version 25). Findings demonstrated a statistically significant and meaningful difference between agency types for procedurally just behaviors and citizen satisfaction. Implications for social change include changing law enforcement agencies' screening policies to one that screens in applicants supportive of procedurally just policing.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Law enforcement. $3 607408
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
653 $a Police hiring
653 $a Police legitimacy
653 $a Police screening
653 $a Police-community relations
653 $a Procedural justice
690 $a 0206
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Criminal Justice. $3 3428431
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-08B.
790 $a 0543
791 $a D.P.A.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28317409