東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Beyond Borders: How Public and Private Actors Institutionalize Intelligence Cooperation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Beyond Borders: How Public and Private Actors Institutionalize Intelligence Cooperation./
作者:	Robson, Maria A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	307 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-05A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28718790
ISBN:	9798492737351

Beyond Borders: How Public and Private Actors Institutionalize Intelligence Cooperation.
Robson, Maria A.

Beyond Borders: How Public and Private Actors Institutionalize Intelligence Cooperation. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 307 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northeastern University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In a rapidly changing global threat environment where risks transcend borders, private actors have developed their own intelligence capabilities and share information to mitigate risks from threats such as terrorism or civil unrest. While states support public-private cooperation to protect critical infrastructure, this is only part of the story. Existing research on intelligence cooperation does not adequately account for private sector actors. Furthermore, many studies explain cooperation through the existence of trust without exploring what drives that trust. This dissertation examines how public and private actors institutionalize intelligence cooperation through transnational horizontal networks. Venues for intelligence cooperation may facilitate any or all of: tactical information exchange and benchmarking, knowledge advancement, and strategic intelligence sharing. My project asks: what determines the degree to which private sector risk intelligence actors cooperate, and the extent to which they institutionalize this cooperation?My research relies on surveys, semi-structured interviews, and participant observation, and focuses on three cases: the U.S. State Department's Overseas Security Advisory Council, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Public-Private Analytic Exchange Program, and the private sector-led Analyst Roundtables. I also examine nascent cases of public-private intelligence-sharing institutions in Canada, including the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, that focus on protecting critical infrastructure from cyber threats.Ultimately, I find that levels of intelligence cooperation are best explained through network ties-influenced by frequency of interactions-and by trust, which is driven by: size of group memberships; ability to identify mutual interests; and ability to vet each other for reliability. I also find that informal institutions substitute for formal institutions when the latter are not meeting actors' intelligence-sharing needs, and that the groups that are most conducive to deep levels of intelligence cooperation are not restricted by citizenship, but are instead transnational. The findings from this dissertation aim to (1) address the gap in intelligence cooperation literature with regard to non-state actors, (2) illuminate intelligence cooperation with private intelligence actors as a case of institutionalized cooperation that transcends borders, and (3) identify critical takeaways for public and private intelligence actors seeking to protect assets and lives.

ISBN: 9798492737351Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Institutions

Beyond Borders: How Public and Private Actors Institutionalize Intelligence Cooperation.
LDR:03787nmm a2200385 4500 001 2344059
005 20220513115359.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798492737351
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28718790
035 $a AAI28718790
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Robson, Maria A. $3 3682779
245 1 0 $a Beyond Borders: How Public and Private Actors Institutionalize Intelligence Cooperation.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 307 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Davis Cross, Mai'a K.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northeastern University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In a rapidly changing global threat environment where risks transcend borders, private actors have developed their own intelligence capabilities and share information to mitigate risks from threats such as terrorism or civil unrest. While states support public-private cooperation to protect critical infrastructure, this is only part of the story. Existing research on intelligence cooperation does not adequately account for private sector actors. Furthermore, many studies explain cooperation through the existence of trust without exploring what drives that trust. This dissertation examines how public and private actors institutionalize intelligence cooperation through transnational horizontal networks. Venues for intelligence cooperation may facilitate any or all of: tactical information exchange and benchmarking, knowledge advancement, and strategic intelligence sharing. My project asks: what determines the degree to which private sector risk intelligence actors cooperate, and the extent to which they institutionalize this cooperation?My research relies on surveys, semi-structured interviews, and participant observation, and focuses on three cases: the U.S. State Department's Overseas Security Advisory Council, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Public-Private Analytic Exchange Program, and the private sector-led Analyst Roundtables. I also examine nascent cases of public-private intelligence-sharing institutions in Canada, including the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, that focus on protecting critical infrastructure from cyber threats.Ultimately, I find that levels of intelligence cooperation are best explained through network ties-influenced by frequency of interactions-and by trust, which is driven by: size of group memberships; ability to identify mutual interests; and ability to vet each other for reliability. I also find that informal institutions substitute for formal institutions when the latter are not meeting actors' intelligence-sharing needs, and that the groups that are most conducive to deep levels of intelligence cooperation are not restricted by citizenship, but are instead transnational. The findings from this dissertation aim to (1) address the gap in intelligence cooperation literature with regard to non-state actors, (2) illuminate intelligence cooperation with private intelligence actors as a case of institutionalized cooperation that transcends borders, and (3) identify critical takeaways for public and private intelligence actors seeking to protect assets and lives.
590 $a School code: 0160.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
653 $a Institutions
653 $a Intelligence
653 $a Intelligence cooperation
653 $a Private sector intelligence
653 $a Public-private partnerships
653 $a Transnational networks
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a Northeastern University. $b Political Science. $3 2106040
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-05A.
790 $a 0160
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28718790