東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Avoiding Technological Lock-In at Army Futures Command: Using Science, Technology, and Society Studies Theories to Plan Future Military Doctrine and Technology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Avoiding Technological Lock-In at Army Futures Command: Using Science, Technology, and Society Studies Theories to Plan Future Military Doctrine and Technology./
作者:	McCafferty, Sean.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	131 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03B.
標題:	Military studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28644706
ISBN:	9798535541976

Avoiding Technological Lock-In at Army Futures Command: Using Science, Technology, and Society Studies Theories to Plan Future Military Doctrine and Technology.
McCafferty, Sean.

Avoiding Technological Lock-In at Army Futures Command: Using Science, Technology, and Society Studies Theories to Plan Future Military Doctrine and Technology. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 131 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Army Futures Command (AFC) has the implicit mission of ensuring that the Army does not get locked into a technology that might be ineffective in a future of competition and conflict. In this dissertation I develop insights and tools that can help assess and inform AFC's efforts to understand and avoid undesirable technological lock-in. I started with three historical case studies of the interactions between technology and military strategy. The first examined the German Army's strategic commitment to using railroads before World War I, forcing them into a military answer to rapidly increased diplomatic tensions in 1914. The second explored how the US Army Air Corps became locked into a doctrine of strategic bombing before World War II, affecting their ability to support ground troops during the Cold War. The third studied why the US Army was able to avoid becoming locked into a tactical nuclear doctrine in the 1950s, despite initial efforts to change Army structure and tactics to accommodate the nuclear battlefield. I identified three factors: 1) rapid changes in the strategic environment; 2) lack of civilian analogues to nuclear weapons; 3) the novelty of tactical nuclear technology, and availability of operational alternatives. The second part of my research sought to identify applicable theories from the fields of science, technology and society studies (STS). I identified five theories (technological systems, co-production, technological lock-in, path dependence, and economic growth theory), each with a brief case study. I sent my initial analysis to eighteen professionals at AFC and used their feedback to determine the utility of these theories for military planning. Finally, I analyzed AFC's current initiatives via semi-structured interviews, gaining insight into AFC's operations to identify three classes of issues that they face: complicated, exterior, and complex. Complicated issues are manageable through organizational methods. Exterior issues require planning to accommodate irreducible uncertainties (such as budgeting processes). Complex issues involved unpredictable interactions among technology and military strategy. I focused on three AFC programs, (artificial intelligence, robotics, and autonomous systems) demonstrating how STS theories can offer additional tools to help guide technological and strategic planning for an uncertain future.

ISBN: 9798535541976Subjects--Topical Terms:

2197382
Military studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Technological lock-in

Avoiding Technological Lock-In at Army Futures Command: Using Science, Technology, and Society Studies Theories to Plan Future Military Doctrine and Technology.
LDR:03707nmm a2200385 4500 001 2344040
005 20220513115354.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798535541976
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28644706
035 $a AAI28644706
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a McCafferty, Sean. $3 3682742
245 1 0 $a Avoiding Technological Lock-In at Army Futures Command: Using Science, Technology, and Society Studies Theories to Plan Future Military Doctrine and Technology.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 131 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Sarewitz, Daniel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Army Futures Command (AFC) has the implicit mission of ensuring that the Army does not get locked into a technology that might be ineffective in a future of competition and conflict. In this dissertation I develop insights and tools that can help assess and inform AFC's efforts to understand and avoid undesirable technological lock-in. I started with three historical case studies of the interactions between technology and military strategy. The first examined the German Army's strategic commitment to using railroads before World War I, forcing them into a military answer to rapidly increased diplomatic tensions in 1914. The second explored how the US Army Air Corps became locked into a doctrine of strategic bombing before World War II, affecting their ability to support ground troops during the Cold War. The third studied why the US Army was able to avoid becoming locked into a tactical nuclear doctrine in the 1950s, despite initial efforts to change Army structure and tactics to accommodate the nuclear battlefield. I identified three factors: 1) rapid changes in the strategic environment; 2) lack of civilian analogues to nuclear weapons; 3) the novelty of tactical nuclear technology, and availability of operational alternatives. The second part of my research sought to identify applicable theories from the fields of science, technology and society studies (STS). I identified five theories (technological systems, co-production, technological lock-in, path dependence, and economic growth theory), each with a brief case study. I sent my initial analysis to eighteen professionals at AFC and used their feedback to determine the utility of these theories for military planning. Finally, I analyzed AFC's current initiatives via semi-structured interviews, gaining insight into AFC's operations to identify three classes of issues that they face: complicated, exterior, and complex. Complicated issues are manageable through organizational methods. Exterior issues require planning to accommodate irreducible uncertainties (such as budgeting processes). Complex issues involved unpredictable interactions among technology and military strategy. I focused on three AFC programs, (artificial intelligence, robotics, and autonomous systems) demonstrating how STS theories can offer additional tools to help guide technological and strategic planning for an uncertain future.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
650 4 $a Cold War. $3 566089
650 4 $a Success. $3 518195
650 4 $a Artificial intelligence. $3 516317
650 4 $a Books. $3 641578
650 4 $a Electric vehicles. $3 1613392
650 4 $a Initiatives. $3 3564334
650 4 $a Bombings. $3 3682743
650 4 $a Railroads. $2 fast $3 2076389
650 4 $a Military engagements. $3 3642033
650 4 $a Military bases. $3 3560116
650 4 $a Military technology. $3 3681356
650 4 $a Nuclear weapons. $3 810318
650 4 $a Military strategy. $3 3682739
650 4 $a Keyboards. $3 3681868
650 4 $a Armed forces. $3 3562018
650 4 $a Case studies. $2 itrt $3 996239
650 4 $a Invasions. $3 3682744
650 4 $a Military policy. $3 753758
650 4 $a Military aircraft. $3 3681706
650 4 $a World War I. $3 3563441
650 4 $a World War II. $3 3303653
653 $a Technological lock-in
653 $a Army Futures Command (AFC)
653 $a Science
653 $a Technology
653 $a Society studies theories
653 $a Future military doctrine and technology
690 $a 0750
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0800
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology. $3 3175256
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03B.
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28644706