東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Politics of Foreign Military Basing.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Politics of Foreign Military Basing./
作者:	Brown, J. Wellington.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	276 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-12.
標題:	International relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27742748
ISBN:	9798645466763

The Politics of Foreign Military Basing.
Brown, J. Wellington.

The Politics of Foreign Military Basing. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 276 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2020.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Foreign military bases are anomalies in a world of sovereign states. Why do major powers station their finite military forces to protect other countries and how does the distribution of these bases relate to a country's grand strategy? Why do host-nations give up their sovereignty and allow foreign forces, capable of existential violence, to deploy within their borders? This dissertation takes a mixed method approach to each of these questions. For the first, I combine descriptive case studies relating the basing postures of five major powers and to their respective grand strategies with a quantitative analysis of the correlates of the US military basing network. To answer the second, I test the role of host-nation security conditions on US military access and then conduct an in-depth process tracing of US-Philippine basing relations. I find that foreign military bases are essential for super-power status and are an arena for great power competition. I conclude that the US foreign basing posture is strongly aligned with American trade relationships and against US enemies. For host-nation motivations, I conclude that security threats to the host-nation matter, but not uniformly. External threats have the greatest influence in increasing foreign military access, but low-intensity revolutionary threats actually tend to decrease a host-nation's willingness to accommodate foreign forces.

ISBN: 9798645466763Subjects--Topical Terms:

531762
International relations.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Bases

The Politics of Foreign Military Basing.
LDR:02644nmm a2200397 4500 001 2343939
005 20220513115328.5
008 241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798645466763
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27742748
035 $a AAI27742748
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Brown, J. Wellington. $3 3682617
245 1 4 $a The Politics of Foreign Military Basing.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 276 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.
500 $a Advisor: Feaver, Peter;Beardsley, Kyle.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2020.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a Foreign military bases are anomalies in a world of sovereign states. Why do major powers station their finite military forces to protect other countries and how does the distribution of these bases relate to a country's grand strategy? Why do host-nations give up their sovereignty and allow foreign forces, capable of existential violence, to deploy within their borders? This dissertation takes a mixed method approach to each of these questions. For the first, I combine descriptive case studies relating the basing postures of five major powers and to their respective grand strategies with a quantitative analysis of the correlates of the US military basing network. To answer the second, I test the role of host-nation security conditions on US military access and then conduct an in-depth process tracing of US-Philippine basing relations. I find that foreign military bases are essential for super-power status and are an arena for great power competition. I conclude that the US foreign basing posture is strongly aligned with American trade relationships and against US enemies. For host-nation motivations, I conclude that security threats to the host-nation matter, but not uniformly. External threats have the greatest influence in increasing foreign military access, but low-intensity revolutionary threats actually tend to decrease a host-nation's willingness to accommodate foreign forces.
590 $a School code: 0066.
650 4 $a International relations. $3 531762
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
653 $a Bases
653 $a Conflict
653 $a Military
653 $a Security
653 $a Strategy
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0750
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a Duke University. $b Political Science. $3 1022396
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-12.
790 $a 0066
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27742748