東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The United Nations' Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Policy, Preference, or Politics.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The United Nations' Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Policy, Preference, or Politics./
作者:	Ruth, Carl K.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	152 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-11A.
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28495758
ISBN:	9798738635595

The United Nations' Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Policy, Preference, or Politics.
Ruth, Carl K.

The United Nations' Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Policy, Preference, or Politics. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 152 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is a three-pillar document that was unanimously approved and adopted at the 2005 World Summit Meeting by members of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) to serve as a guideline for addressing mass atrocity crimes. The research problem concerned the successful implementation of the third pillar, a key fixture of R2P, which allows the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to use forceful measures, as a last resort to address mass atrocity crimes. However, a climate of division within the UNSC has led to inaction. Using the R2P doctrine as a theoretical framework, the purpose of this qualitative case study was to examine the third pillar, in crisis-related situations, such as Syria beginning in 2012. The research questions addressed the application of the third pillar in crisis-related situations involving mass atrocity crimes, specifically in Syria. This study used a qualitative case study framework to collect, examine, and analyze secondary data on R2P. This data was coded using a descriptive coding strategy, where similar words, phrases, and ideological beliefs were analyzed and developed into major themes for synthesis and analysis. The results found an inconsistent application of the third pillar, resulting in policy inaction, and even failure of public administration to achieve consensus within the UNSC. The implications for positive social change include recommendations for procedures on successfully implementing the third pillar if the UNSC fails to act. The potential public policy modification would allow victims of mass atrocities crimes the opportunity to achieve safety and security, in accordance with the United Nations (UN) Charter's common purposes and principles.

ISBN: 9798738635595Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Humanitarian intervention

The United Nations' Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Policy, Preference, or Politics.
LDR:02940nmm a2200385 4500 001 2342199
005 20211209144708.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798738635595
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28495758
035 $a AAI28495758
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ruth, Carl K. $3 3680511
245 1 4 $a The United Nations' Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Policy, Preference, or Politics.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 152 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Williamson, Clarence.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is a three-pillar document that was unanimously approved and adopted at the 2005 World Summit Meeting by members of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) to serve as a guideline for addressing mass atrocity crimes. The research problem concerned the successful implementation of the third pillar, a key fixture of R2P, which allows the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to use forceful measures, as a last resort to address mass atrocity crimes. However, a climate of division within the UNSC has led to inaction. Using the R2P doctrine as a theoretical framework, the purpose of this qualitative case study was to examine the third pillar, in crisis-related situations, such as Syria beginning in 2012. The research questions addressed the application of the third pillar in crisis-related situations involving mass atrocity crimes, specifically in Syria. This study used a qualitative case study framework to collect, examine, and analyze secondary data on R2P. This data was coded using a descriptive coding strategy, where similar words, phrases, and ideological beliefs were analyzed and developed into major themes for synthesis and analysis. The results found an inconsistent application of the third pillar, resulting in policy inaction, and even failure of public administration to achieve consensus within the UNSC. The implications for positive social change include recommendations for procedures on successfully implementing the third pillar if the UNSC fails to act. The potential public policy modification would allow victims of mass atrocities crimes the opportunity to achieve safety and security, in accordance with the United Nations (UN) Charter's common purposes and principles.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
653 $a Humanitarian intervention
653 $a Libya
653 $a Military intervention
653 $a Responsibility to Protect
653 $a Syria
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Public Policy and Administration. $3 1026795
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-11A.
790 $a 0543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28495758