東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Avoiding Miscomprehension: A Metacog...

Norberg, Kole Andreas.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Avoiding Miscomprehension: A Metacognitive Perspective for How Readers Identify and Overcome Comprehension Failure.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Avoiding Miscomprehension: A Metacognitive Perspective for How Readers Identify and Overcome Comprehension Failure./
作者:	Norberg, Kole Andreas.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	189 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-04B.
標題:	Acupuncture. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29335796
ISBN:	9798352600009

Avoiding Miscomprehension: A Metacognitive Perspective for How Readers Identify and Overcome Comprehension Failure.
Norberg, Kole Andreas.

Avoiding Miscomprehension: A Metacognitive Perspective for How Readers Identify and Overcome Comprehension Failure. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 189 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Successful reading comprehension is not a guarantee, even for highly skilled readers. When comprehension fails, the ability of the reader to recognize the failure may be critical to avoiding miscomprehension (i.e., false confidence in an inaccurate text representation) and to taking steps to improve comprehension. Generally, people learn the most when they study partially-learned, as opposed to well-learned or completely-unlearned, content (i.e., Region of Proximal Learning; Metcalfe & Kornell, 2003). However, this requires the learner both to identify the difficulty level of the material (monitor learning) and to select the proximal material (control). Across two experiments, the current study assessed the interactive effects of monitoring and control in a reading context. Experiment 1a confirmed that readers do make greater gains when reading material of a moderate difficulty level, but Experiments 1b and 1c suggested that poor monitoring is not the reason that readers do not always select this material; rather, readers intentionally selected the hardest material. Although monitoring accuracy was not predictive of reader selections, readers were overconfident in their comprehension across Experiments. Experiment 2 tested the use of an ease-of-process heuristic during comprehension monitoring. Readers were especially overconfident in their comprehension when a text seemed easier to process, in part because they were less likely to attend to difficulties (unfamiliar words) in the text. Texts that "feel" simpler engender shallower processing, which can lead to overconfidence in comprehension. Thus, readers struggle with both comprehension monitoring and metacognitive control, but whereas errors in monitoring appear to be based on incompatibility of the text with the applied heuristic, errors in control may be rooted in the reader's beliefs about learning.

ISBN: 9798352600009Subjects--Topical Terms:

644663
Acupuncture.

Avoiding Miscomprehension: A Metacognitive Perspective for How Readers Identify and Overcome Comprehension Failure.
LDR:03133nmm a2200409 4500 001 2323167
005 20231010062923.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 231204s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798352600009
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29335796
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Pittsburgh42533
035 $a AAI29335796
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Norberg, Kole Andreas. $3 3642152
245 1 0 $a Avoiding Miscomprehension: A Metacognitive Perspective for How Readers Identify and Overcome Comprehension Failure.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 189 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Fraundorf, Scott H. .
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Successful reading comprehension is not a guarantee, even for highly skilled readers. When comprehension fails, the ability of the reader to recognize the failure may be critical to avoiding miscomprehension (i.e., false confidence in an inaccurate text representation) and to taking steps to improve comprehension. Generally, people learn the most when they study partially-learned, as opposed to well-learned or completely-unlearned, content (i.e., Region of Proximal Learning; Metcalfe & Kornell, 2003). However, this requires the learner both to identify the difficulty level of the material (monitor learning) and to select the proximal material (control). Across two experiments, the current study assessed the interactive effects of monitoring and control in a reading context. Experiment 1a confirmed that readers do make greater gains when reading material of a moderate difficulty level, but Experiments 1b and 1c suggested that poor monitoring is not the reason that readers do not always select this material; rather, readers intentionally selected the hardest material. Although monitoring accuracy was not predictive of reader selections, readers were overconfident in their comprehension across Experiments. Experiment 2 tested the use of an ease-of-process heuristic during comprehension monitoring. Readers were especially overconfident in their comprehension when a text seemed easier to process, in part because they were less likely to attend to difficulties (unfamiliar words) in the text. Texts that "feel" simpler engender shallower processing, which can lead to overconfidence in comprehension. Thus, readers struggle with both comprehension monitoring and metacognitive control, but whereas errors in monitoring appear to be based on incompatibility of the text with the applied heuristic, errors in control may be rooted in the reader's beliefs about learning.
590 $a School code: 0178.
650 4 $a Acupuncture. $3 644663
650 4 $a Pain management. $3 3562647
650 4 $a Memory. $3 522110
650 4 $a Educational materials. $3 3642153
650 4 $a Reading comprehension. $3 519378
650 4 $a Metacognition. $3 521861
650 4 $a Readers. $3 522900
650 4 $a Monitoring systems. $3 3543995
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Cognition & reasoning. $3 3556293
650 4 $a Skills. $3 3221615
650 4 $a Alternative medicine. $3 536195
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Therapy. $3 3343697
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0496
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0212
710 2 $a University of Pittsburgh. $3 958527
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-04B.
790 $a 0178
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29335796