東華大學圖書館 |

Death determination by neurologic criteria = areas of consensus and controversy /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Death determination by neurologic criteria/ edited by Ariane Lewis, James L. Bernat.
Reminder of title:	areas of consensus and controversy /
other author:	Lewis, Ariane.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2022.,
Description:	vii, 498 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Introduction/History of Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria -- Part I: Philosophical/Conceptual -- Arguments Supporting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Rejecting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Supporting the Whole-Brain Criterion -- Arguments Supporting the Brain Stem Criterion -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is not Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part II: Medical -- Intra/International Variability in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Controversies in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria in Pediatric Patients -- Arguments in Favor of Requiring the Absence of Brain Circulation to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing the Requirement to Demonstrate Absence of Blood Flow to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Reports of "Recovery" from Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Observation Time Prior to Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Temperature Considerations in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- How Many Evaluations are Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Part III: Scientific -- Research Questions about Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Research on Patients Declared Dead by Neurologic Criteria -- The Impact of Restoring Postmortem Mammalian Brain Circulation and Cellular Functions on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part IV: Legal -- The Content of Laws on Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Is Consent Required for Physicians' Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Legal Response to Religious and Other Objections to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Death by Neurologic Criteria is a Legal Fiction -- Legal Considerations on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the Pregnant Patient -- Part V: Religious -- Christian Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Islamic Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Jewish Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part VI: Ethical/Social -- Public Views on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Asia -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Africa -- The Argument for Personal Choice in Defining Death -- The distinction Between Death Declaration and Death Determination Using Neurologic -- Criteria -- Why Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Favoring Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurological Criteria.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Brain death. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3
ISBN:	9783031159473

Death determination by neurologic criteria = areas of consensus and controversy /
Death determination by neurologic criteriaareas of consensus and controversy /[electronic resource] :edited by Ariane Lewis, James L. Bernat. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022. - vii, 498 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Advances in neuroethics,2522-5685. - Advances in neuroethics..

Introduction/History of Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria -- Part I: Philosophical/Conceptual -- Arguments Supporting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Rejecting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Supporting the Whole-Brain Criterion -- Arguments Supporting the Brain Stem Criterion -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is not Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part II: Medical -- Intra/International Variability in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Controversies in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria in Pediatric Patients -- Arguments in Favor of Requiring the Absence of Brain Circulation to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing the Requirement to Demonstrate Absence of Blood Flow to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Reports of "Recovery" from Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Observation Time Prior to Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Temperature Considerations in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- How Many Evaluations are Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Part III: Scientific -- Research Questions about Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Research on Patients Declared Dead by Neurologic Criteria -- The Impact of Restoring Postmortem Mammalian Brain Circulation and Cellular Functions on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part IV: Legal -- The Content of Laws on Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Is Consent Required for Physicians' Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Legal Response to Religious and Other Objections to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Death by Neurologic Criteria is a Legal Fiction -- Legal Considerations on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the Pregnant Patient -- Part V: Religious -- Christian Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Islamic Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Jewish Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part VI: Ethical/Social -- Public Views on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Asia -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Africa -- The Argument for Personal Choice in Defining Death -- The distinction Between Death Declaration and Death Determination Using Neurologic -- Criteria -- Why Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Favoring Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurological Criteria.

This book presents principal controversies over the determination of death by neurologic criteria ("brain death") The editors and authors are exceedingly well-versed in this subject and are on the forefront of the current debates. The content is divided in the following disciplinary: philosophical (conceptual), medical, scientific, legal, religious, and ethical/social. Many of the topics feature pro-con debates, allowing readers to consider the merits of the arguments and decide their own position. The work is targeted to clinicians and nurses who treat critically ill and dying patients, organ donation personnel, ethicists and philosophers who write on end-of-life issues, and lawyers and legislative/public policy professionals who draft laws on death determination. It identifies and debates the essential controversies currently raging in academic and public policy circles over the medical adequacy, scientific validity, and conceptual coherence of death determination by neurologic criteria. Whether a professional or a student, the reader will be given a comprehensive course in the most pressing controversies and areas of consensus in the determination of death by neurologic criteria.

ISBN: 9783031159473

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

867360
Brain death.

LC Class. No.: RA1063.3

Dewey Class. No.: 616.078

Death determination by neurologic criteria = areas of consensus and controversy /
LDR:05103nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2307054
003 DE-He213
005 20221221072230.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230421s2022 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031159473 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031159466 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-15947-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a RA1063.3
072 7 $a MJN $2 bicssc
072 7 $a MED056000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a MKJ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 616.078 $2 23
090 $a RA1063.3 $b .D285 2022
245 0 0 $a Death determination by neurologic criteria $h [electronic resource] : $b areas of consensus and controversy / $c edited by Ariane Lewis, James L. Bernat.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a vii, 498 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Advances in neuroethics, $x 2522-5685
505 0 $a Introduction/History of Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria -- Part I: Philosophical/Conceptual -- Arguments Supporting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Rejecting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Supporting the Whole-Brain Criterion -- Arguments Supporting the Brain Stem Criterion -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is not Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part II: Medical -- Intra/International Variability in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Controversies in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria in Pediatric Patients -- Arguments in Favor of Requiring the Absence of Brain Circulation to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing the Requirement to Demonstrate Absence of Blood Flow to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Reports of "Recovery" from Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Observation Time Prior to Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Temperature Considerations in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- How Many Evaluations are Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Part III: Scientific -- Research Questions about Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Research on Patients Declared Dead by Neurologic Criteria -- The Impact of Restoring Postmortem Mammalian Brain Circulation and Cellular Functions on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part IV: Legal -- The Content of Laws on Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Is Consent Required for Physicians' Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Legal Response to Religious and Other Objections to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Death by Neurologic Criteria is a Legal Fiction -- Legal Considerations on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the Pregnant Patient -- Part V: Religious -- Christian Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Islamic Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Jewish Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part VI: Ethical/Social -- Public Views on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Asia -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Africa -- The Argument for Personal Choice in Defining Death -- The distinction Between Death Declaration and Death Determination Using Neurologic -- Criteria -- Why Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Favoring Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurological Criteria.
520 $a This book presents principal controversies over the determination of death by neurologic criteria ("brain death") The editors and authors are exceedingly well-versed in this subject and are on the forefront of the current debates. The content is divided in the following disciplinary: philosophical (conceptual), medical, scientific, legal, religious, and ethical/social. Many of the topics feature pro-con debates, allowing readers to consider the merits of the arguments and decide their own position. The work is targeted to clinicians and nurses who treat critically ill and dying patients, organ donation personnel, ethicists and philosophers who write on end-of-life issues, and lawyers and legislative/public policy professionals who draft laws on death determination. It identifies and debates the essential controversies currently raging in academic and public policy circles over the medical adequacy, scientific validity, and conceptual coherence of death determination by neurologic criteria. Whether a professional or a student, the reader will be given a comprehensive course in the most pressing controversies and areas of consensus in the determination of death by neurologic criteria.
650 0 $a Brain death. $3 867360
650 0 $a Neurosciences $x Moral and ethical aspects. $3 1346780
700 1 $a Lewis, Ariane. $3 3611932
700 1 $a Bernat, James L. $3 1092179
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Advances in neuroethics. $3 3411158
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3
950 $a Medicine (SpringerNature-11650)