東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

National Humiliation and Internation...

Masterson, Michael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

National Humiliation and International Conflict: Origins, Microfoundations, and Effects.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	National Humiliation and International Conflict: Origins, Microfoundations, and Effects./
作者:	Masterson, Michael.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	190 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-03A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28088288
ISBN:	9798664759198

National Humiliation and International Conflict: Origins, Microfoundations, and Effects.
Masterson, Michael.

National Humiliation and International Conflict: Origins, Microfoundations, and Effects. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 190 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Politicians and scholars often link national humiliation to military conflict, yet the psychological mechanisms underlying this link (its microfoundations) are under-theorized and untested. Can emotions, like humiliation, actually affect international bargaining? If so, through what mechanisms does humiliation operate? Further, if emotions, such as national humiliation have implications for foreign policy preferences, under what circumstances do such emotions become politically relevant?To understand the influences of national humiliation on foreign policy preferences, I draw from experimental psychology and neuroscience to theorize that national humiliation makes individuals more supportive of hostile foreign policies by decreasing their sensitivity to the costs of these policies. I find support for this theory using both survey and lab experiments that exploit the carryover effects of humiliation on unrelated decisions to isolate its effects on conflict preferences. These experiments are the first to distinguish support among the mechanisms through which humiliation influences conflict preferences.To examine whether these dynamics occur as predicted outside of the lab, I use supervised machine learning to measure expressions of national humiliation and support for costly, hostile foreign policies in a large (more than 1.6 billion posts), representative data set of Chinese social media posts. I find that posts invoking national humiliation are more likely to support using military force, maintaining disputed territorial claims, and raising trade barriers. I show that previous days' posts about national humiliation increase posts advocating hostile foreign policy options on subsequent days.Contrary to previous accounts that have tended to emphasize the role of traumatic events in the creation of national humiliation narratives, I argue that these events provide neither a necessary nor a sufficient explanation of narrative construction. Instead, narratives of national humiliation enter political discourse when a political group can blame its opponents for the event constructed as humiliating while escaping blame itself. Further, political groups propagate these narratives when they desire to inspire sacrifice on behalf of the nation. I find that my theory better accounts for Chinese and Indian political group behavior over the 20th century than alternatives that emphasize the importance of humiliating events, legitimacy crises, and international bargaining dynamics.

ISBN: 9798664759198Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

China

National Humiliation and International Conflict: Origins, Microfoundations, and Effects.
LDR:03770nmm a2200385 4500 001 2285310
005 20211129133334.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798664759198
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28088288
035 $a AAI28088288
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Masterson, Michael. $3 848664
245 1 0 $a National Humiliation and International Conflict: Origins, Microfoundations, and Effects.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 190 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Advisor: Weeks, Jessica.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Politicians and scholars often link national humiliation to military conflict, yet the psychological mechanisms underlying this link (its microfoundations) are under-theorized and untested. Can emotions, like humiliation, actually affect international bargaining? If so, through what mechanisms does humiliation operate? Further, if emotions, such as national humiliation have implications for foreign policy preferences, under what circumstances do such emotions become politically relevant?To understand the influences of national humiliation on foreign policy preferences, I draw from experimental psychology and neuroscience to theorize that national humiliation makes individuals more supportive of hostile foreign policies by decreasing their sensitivity to the costs of these policies. I find support for this theory using both survey and lab experiments that exploit the carryover effects of humiliation on unrelated decisions to isolate its effects on conflict preferences. These experiments are the first to distinguish support among the mechanisms through which humiliation influences conflict preferences.To examine whether these dynamics occur as predicted outside of the lab, I use supervised machine learning to measure expressions of national humiliation and support for costly, hostile foreign policies in a large (more than 1.6 billion posts), representative data set of Chinese social media posts. I find that posts invoking national humiliation are more likely to support using military force, maintaining disputed territorial claims, and raising trade barriers. I show that previous days' posts about national humiliation increase posts advocating hostile foreign policy options on subsequent days.Contrary to previous accounts that have tended to emphasize the role of traumatic events in the creation of national humiliation narratives, I argue that these events provide neither a necessary nor a sufficient explanation of narrative construction. Instead, narratives of national humiliation enter political discourse when a political group can blame its opponents for the event constructed as humiliating while escaping blame itself. Further, political groups propagate these narratives when they desire to inspire sacrifice on behalf of the nation. I find that my theory better accounts for Chinese and Indian political group behavior over the 20th century than alternatives that emphasize the importance of humiliating events, legitimacy crises, and international bargaining dynamics.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
653 $a China
653 $a Conflict
653 $a Emotions
653 $a Humiliation
653 $a Nationalism
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b Political Science. $3 2049944
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-03A.
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28088288