東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Right of Suffrage of Shosics (No...

Castellanos Canales, Arturo.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Right of Suffrage of Shosics (Noncitizens) in the United States.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Right of Suffrage of Shosics (Noncitizens) in the United States./
作者:	Castellanos Canales, Arturo.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	457 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-12A.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27962678
ISBN:	9798641814384

The Right of Suffrage of Shosics (Noncitizens) in the United States.
Castellanos Canales, Arturo.

The Right of Suffrage of Shosics (Noncitizens) in the United States. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 457 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: A.

Thesis (J.S.D.)--Cornell University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Shosics-commonly known as noncitizens-cannot vote in virtually any election of the United States. Outrightly preventing them from participating in all electoral jurisdictions, on account of their citizenship, is unreasonable. As long as Shosics can demonstrate sufficient connections and roots to their place of residence, they should be allowed to participate in specific elections. This theory, called The Sufficient Connection Theory, provides a novel understanding of the demos in a democracy. The right of suffrage is a twofold fundamental right. It is a fundamental right per se enshrined in various laws and international treaties, and it is also fundamental because it is a manifestation of the right of freedom of expression. States are only allowed to hinder the right of suffrage of Shosics as long as they can prove a narrowly tailored compelling state interest. The state's arguments to disenfranchise Shosics must be specifically crafted to suit the federal, state, county, city, town, village, or district elections. Each jurisdiction must give its own reasonable, proportional, and necessary justification. Shosics are neither explicitly nor implicitly disenfranchised in almost any state constitution of the United States. Except in Arizona and North Dakota, where the right of suffrage is an exclusive prerogative of American citizens, Shosics should be allowed to vote in all state, county, city, town, village, and district elections in the remaining forty-eight states.

ISBN: 9798641814384Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Elections

The Right of Suffrage of Shosics (Noncitizens) in the United States.
LDR:02633nmm a2200385 4500 001 2284555
005 20211123073345.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798641814384
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27962678
035 $a AAI27962678
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Castellanos Canales, Arturo. $3 3563731
245 1 4 $a The Right of Suffrage of Shosics (Noncitizens) in the United States.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 457 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Yu, Xingzhong.
502 $a Thesis (J.S.D.)--Cornell University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Shosics-commonly known as noncitizens-cannot vote in virtually any election of the United States. Outrightly preventing them from participating in all electoral jurisdictions, on account of their citizenship, is unreasonable. As long as Shosics can demonstrate sufficient connections and roots to their place of residence, they should be allowed to participate in specific elections. This theory, called The Sufficient Connection Theory, provides a novel understanding of the demos in a democracy. The right of suffrage is a twofold fundamental right. It is a fundamental right per se enshrined in various laws and international treaties, and it is also fundamental because it is a manifestation of the right of freedom of expression. States are only allowed to hinder the right of suffrage of Shosics as long as they can prove a narrowly tailored compelling state interest. The state's arguments to disenfranchise Shosics must be specifically crafted to suit the federal, state, county, city, town, village, or district elections. Each jurisdiction must give its own reasonable, proportional, and necessary justification. Shosics are neither explicitly nor implicitly disenfranchised in almost any state constitution of the United States. Except in Arizona and North Dakota, where the right of suffrage is an exclusive prerogative of American citizens, Shosics should be allowed to vote in all state, county, city, town, village, and district elections in the remaining forty-eight states.
590 $a School code: 0058.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
653 $a Elections
653 $a Immigrants
653 $a Non-citizens
653 $a Noncitizens
653 $a Suffrage
653 $a vote
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a Cornell University. $b Law. $3 3432005
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-12A.
790 $a 0058
791 $a J.S.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27962678