東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Dynamic of Normalizing Corruptio...

Alhekail, NIjla Abdulrahman.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Dynamic of Normalizing Corruption in Government Institutions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Dynamic of Normalizing Corruption in Government Institutions./
作者:	Alhekail, NIjla Abdulrahman.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	260 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-03A.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22618135
ISBN:	9781085695800

The Dynamic of Normalizing Corruption in Government Institutions.
Alhekail, NIjla Abdulrahman.

The Dynamic of Normalizing Corruption in Government Institutions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 260 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.

Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Kansas, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Institutional corruption imposes high costs on society and the provision of public goods. Therefore, many scholars have studied the problem of corruption from different angles, but corruption is a complex phenomenon and hard to reduce to a simple formula or model. There is a great number of studies about the causes of corruption, but they do not examine the dynamic that creates this problem. The failure to identify how corruption starts makes many anti-corruption initiatives fail because these initiatives adopt a strategy without considering whether that strategy effectively targets the root causes of corruption. . Thus, this dissertation examines the dynamics of normalizing corruption in government institutions, using law and economics as a tool for the analysis. In particular, the dissertation is developed from a model that Blake Ashforth and Vikas Anand launched in their paper, "The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations." Normalizing corruption in institutions can be divided into two stages, each of which has two pillars. The first stage is normalizing corruption among individuals. At this stage, corrupted behaviors are just the decisions of individuals who have incentives that push them to become involve in corruption. The first pillar normalizing corruption at the individual level is the individual decision to engage in corrupt behavior. As rational economic actors, individuals decide whether to engage in corruption by assessing its costs and benefits. If the material benefits of corruption are higher than the costs, individuals have financial incentives to engage in corrupt behavior. Nonetheless, because engaging in wrongful behavior incurs psychic costs, people often try to find a way to rationalize their actions. This is the second pillar of normalizing corruption at the individual level. As more individuals engage in corrupt behavior, they work together to rationalize their actions until corruption is routinized and people within an institution accept it.In other words, corruption reaches a tipping point at which corruption is normalized corruption at the institutional level. In this level. Corruption is collective action instead of individual action. Corruption at this stage is transformed to be part of the institutional culture. This happens by standing on two pillars. The first one is socializing corruption where the newcomers are induced to view corruption acceptable, and in some situations desirable. When corruption is socialized, corruption becomes a social norm that individuals unconsciously internalize and to which they conform their behavior in order to be accepted by the institution's members. The second pillar is legitimizing corruption, which is seen in institutions that suffer from systematic corruption. In this pillar, corruption is legal and supported by the rule of law, and sometimes by the public opinion.As a response to the problem of normalizing corruption, I adopted the UNDP suggestion, which is the 'sandwich situation'. The sandwich situation means that defeating corruption combines a "top-down" and a "bottom-up" approach. The top-down anti-corruption approach is adopted by governments and can include the compliance approach, the integrity approach, or both. On the other hand, the bottom-up approach is implemented by citizens, the institutions of civil society, and the media.

ISBN: 9781085695800Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Accountability

The Dynamic of Normalizing Corruption in Government Institutions.
LDR:04626nmm a2200397 4500 001 2284508
005 20211123073334.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781085695800
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22618135
035 $a AAI22618135
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Alhekail, NIjla Abdulrahman. $0 (orcid)NajlaHekail $3 3563678
245 1 4 $a The Dynamic of Normalizing Corruption in Government Institutions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 260 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Levy, Richard E.
502 $a Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Kansas, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a Institutional corruption imposes high costs on society and the provision of public goods. Therefore, many scholars have studied the problem of corruption from different angles, but corruption is a complex phenomenon and hard to reduce to a simple formula or model. There is a great number of studies about the causes of corruption, but they do not examine the dynamic that creates this problem. The failure to identify how corruption starts makes many anti-corruption initiatives fail because these initiatives adopt a strategy without considering whether that strategy effectively targets the root causes of corruption. . Thus, this dissertation examines the dynamics of normalizing corruption in government institutions, using law and economics as a tool for the analysis. In particular, the dissertation is developed from a model that Blake Ashforth and Vikas Anand launched in their paper, "The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations." Normalizing corruption in institutions can be divided into two stages, each of which has two pillars. The first stage is normalizing corruption among individuals. At this stage, corrupted behaviors are just the decisions of individuals who have incentives that push them to become involve in corruption. The first pillar normalizing corruption at the individual level is the individual decision to engage in corrupt behavior. As rational economic actors, individuals decide whether to engage in corruption by assessing its costs and benefits. If the material benefits of corruption are higher than the costs, individuals have financial incentives to engage in corrupt behavior. Nonetheless, because engaging in wrongful behavior incurs psychic costs, people often try to find a way to rationalize their actions. This is the second pillar of normalizing corruption at the individual level. As more individuals engage in corrupt behavior, they work together to rationalize their actions until corruption is routinized and people within an institution accept it.In other words, corruption reaches a tipping point at which corruption is normalized corruption at the institutional level. In this level. Corruption is collective action instead of individual action. Corruption at this stage is transformed to be part of the institutional culture. This happens by standing on two pillars. The first one is socializing corruption where the newcomers are induced to view corruption acceptable, and in some situations desirable. When corruption is socialized, corruption becomes a social norm that individuals unconsciously internalize and to which they conform their behavior in order to be accepted by the institution's members. The second pillar is legitimizing corruption, which is seen in institutions that suffer from systematic corruption. In this pillar, corruption is legal and supported by the rule of law, and sometimes by the public opinion.As a response to the problem of normalizing corruption, I adopted the UNDP suggestion, which is the 'sandwich situation'. The sandwich situation means that defeating corruption combines a "top-down" and a "bottom-up" approach. The top-down anti-corruption approach is adopted by governments and can include the compliance approach, the integrity approach, or both. On the other hand, the bottom-up approach is implemented by citizens, the institutions of civil society, and the media.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Law enforcement. $3 607408
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
653 $a Accountability
653 $a Administrative law
653 $a Corruption
653 $a Governance
653 $a Legitimacy
653 $a Public administration
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0206
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Law. $3 2093723
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-03A.
790 $a 0099
791 $a S.J.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22618135