Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
An Investigation into the Sensitivit...
~
Pitt, Hannah Elizabeth.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
An Investigation into the Sensitivity of Differential Ratings of Perceived Exertion (dRpe) as a Tool to Measure Internal Training Load in Team Sport Players.
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
An Investigation into the Sensitivity of Differential Ratings of Perceived Exertion (dRpe) as a Tool to Measure Internal Training Load in Team Sport Players./
Author:
Pitt, Hannah Elizabeth.
Published:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:
110 p.
Notes:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International83-03.
Subject:
Load. -
Online resource:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28502586
ISBN:
9798505574362
An Investigation into the Sensitivity of Differential Ratings of Perceived Exertion (dRpe) as a Tool to Measure Internal Training Load in Team Sport Players.
Pitt, Hannah Elizabeth.
An Investigation into the Sensitivity of Differential Ratings of Perceived Exertion (dRpe) as a Tool to Measure Internal Training Load in Team Sport Players.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 110 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
Thesis (Master's)--Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom), 2021.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Monitoring the internal response to training load in team sports has the potential to improve performance and reduce the risk of injury. A solution to monitor the internal load of individuals is to collect a subjective rating of perceived exertion (RPE). However, RPE may be theoretically limited by its approach in combing a variety of inputs into one gestalt score. To overcome this limitation, recent advances in monitoring have led to the development of a differential rating of perceived exertion (dRPE) which has the potential to provide a more sensitive evaluation of internal load. The aim of the current study was to investigate the ability of dRPE to detect changes in the physiological demands associated with different deceleration profiles in high-intensity running protocols. Thirteen male team sport players completed four exercise protocols (Dec5m, Dec15m, Dec5/15m and Dec15/5m) which involved 20 repetitions of a 30 metre high-intensity run but with different deceleration profiles. Ratings of muscular exertion (RPE_L) and feelings of breathlessness (RPE_B) were recorded after every repetition. In addition to dRPE the external load of the protocols was measured using 10 Hz GPS devices (Optimeye S5, Firmware 7.38, Catapult Sports, Melbourne, Australia) and measures of muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue were assessed. Total distance (p = 0.615) and average maximum velocity (p = 0.360) was consistent between the protocols. Peak deceleration was greater in the Dec5m protocol compared to the Dec15m protocol (p = 0.005). Changes in RPE_L and RPE_B increased substantially from the first to the last repetition during all the protocols. However, the rate of change in RPE_L and RPE_B from the first to the last repetition between the protocols ranged from likely trivial to most likely trivial. Comparisons of neuromuscular function measures were unclear for most of the time points. There was a very likely increase in muscle soreness in the Dec5m protocol compared to the Dec15m protocol 48 hours post protocol. In conclusion, dRPE might not be a sensitive enough measure to detect small differences in the muscular and respiratory demands of the protocols and cohort used in this study. However, the lack of sensitivity may be exercise/sport and/or population dependent.
ISBN: 9798505574362Subjects--Topical Terms:
3562902
Load.
An Investigation into the Sensitivity of Differential Ratings of Perceived Exertion (dRpe) as a Tool to Measure Internal Training Load in Team Sport Players.
LDR
:03457nmm a2200337 4500
001
2284049
005
20211115072018.5
008
220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798505574362
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28502586
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)LiverpoolJohnMoores14591
035
$a
AAI28502586
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Pitt, Hannah Elizabeth.
$3
3563150
245
1 3
$a
An Investigation into the Sensitivity of Differential Ratings of Perceived Exertion (dRpe) as a Tool to Measure Internal Training Load in Team Sport Players.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2021
300
$a
110 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
500
$a
Advisor: Drust, Barry.
502
$a
Thesis (Master's)--Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom), 2021.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Monitoring the internal response to training load in team sports has the potential to improve performance and reduce the risk of injury. A solution to monitor the internal load of individuals is to collect a subjective rating of perceived exertion (RPE). However, RPE may be theoretically limited by its approach in combing a variety of inputs into one gestalt score. To overcome this limitation, recent advances in monitoring have led to the development of a differential rating of perceived exertion (dRPE) which has the potential to provide a more sensitive evaluation of internal load. The aim of the current study was to investigate the ability of dRPE to detect changes in the physiological demands associated with different deceleration profiles in high-intensity running protocols. Thirteen male team sport players completed four exercise protocols (Dec5m, Dec15m, Dec5/15m and Dec15/5m) which involved 20 repetitions of a 30 metre high-intensity run but with different deceleration profiles. Ratings of muscular exertion (RPE_L) and feelings of breathlessness (RPE_B) were recorded after every repetition. In addition to dRPE the external load of the protocols was measured using 10 Hz GPS devices (Optimeye S5, Firmware 7.38, Catapult Sports, Melbourne, Australia) and measures of muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue were assessed. Total distance (p = 0.615) and average maximum velocity (p = 0.360) was consistent between the protocols. Peak deceleration was greater in the Dec5m protocol compared to the Dec15m protocol (p = 0.005). Changes in RPE_L and RPE_B increased substantially from the first to the last repetition during all the protocols. However, the rate of change in RPE_L and RPE_B from the first to the last repetition between the protocols ranged from likely trivial to most likely trivial. Comparisons of neuromuscular function measures were unclear for most of the time points. There was a very likely increase in muscle soreness in the Dec5m protocol compared to the Dec15m protocol 48 hours post protocol. In conclusion, dRPE might not be a sensitive enough measure to detect small differences in the muscular and respiratory demands of the protocols and cohort used in this study. However, the lack of sensitivity may be exercise/sport and/or population dependent.
590
$a
School code: 8357.
650
4
$a
Load.
$3
3562902
650
4
$a
Physiology.
$3
518431
650
4
$a
Global positioning systems--GPS.
$3
3559357
650
4
$a
Running.
$3
631827
650
4
$a
Velocity.
$3
3560495
650
4
$a
Physical fitness.
$3
522279
650
4
$a
Basketball.
$3
629604
650
4
$a
Perceptions.
$3
3435328
650
4
$a
Professional soccer.
$3
3563003
650
4
$a
Australian football.
$3
3563151
650
4
$a
Cartilage.
$3
924011
650
4
$a
Athletes.
$3
536205
650
4
$a
Fitness equipment.
$3
3563152
650
4
$a
Ratings & rankings.
$3
3562221
650
4
$a
Team sports.
$3
3311497
650
4
$a
Confidence intervals.
$3
566017
650
4
$a
Feedback.
$3
677181
650
4
$a
Soccer.
$3
520214
650
4
$a
Field hockey.
$3
3563153
650
4
$a
Sports injuries.
$3
520144
650
4
$a
Rugby.
$3
3563154
650
4
$a
Variance analysis.
$3
3544969
650
4
$a
Biology.
$3
522710
650
4
$a
Mechanics.
$3
525881
650
4
$a
Social psychology.
$3
520219
650
4
$a
Laboratories.
$3
531588
650
4
$a
Investigations.
$3
3561159
690
$a
0306
690
$a
0346
690
$a
0719
690
$a
0451
710
2
$a
Liverpool John Moores University (United Kingdom).
$3
3556313
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
83-03.
790
$a
8357
791
$a
Master's
792
$a
2021
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28502586
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9435782
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login