東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Legal Data: Bias in the Law, and How...

Avery, Joseph J.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Legal Data: Bias in the Law, and How Legal Technology Can Be Built to Help Correct for It.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Legal Data: Bias in the Law, and How Legal Technology Can Be Built to Help Correct for It./
Author:	Avery, Joseph J.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:	262 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-12B.
Subject:	Behavioral sciences. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28493034
ISBN:	9798515255367

Legal Data: Bias in the Law, and How Legal Technology Can Be Built to Help Correct for It.
Avery, Joseph J.

Legal Data: Bias in the Law, and How Legal Technology Can Be Built to Help Correct for It. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 262 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

There is significant racial disparity in U.S. incarceration rates, with African Americans vastly overrepresented in prisons and jails. This was true a century and a half ago, and it is true today. Surprisingly, and in spite of decades of social psychological research, we still do not have clear answers to fundamental questions undergirding this fact: what accounts for the racially disproportionate rates of incarceration, and at what points in the criminal justice process does bias emerge, causing minority defendants to be treated differently than White defendants?In this dissertation, I cover three aspects of this problem. First, I consider bias in the law, focusing on the criminal justice actors most central to plea bargaining: criminal defense attorneys and prosecutors. I also focus on their decision making during a critical period: post-arrest and pretrial. Second, I consider stereotypes of criminal subtypes and what these stereotypes mean for legal decision making. Third, I propose that the most feasible and promising approach is to guide criminal justice actors' decision making through the use of machine-generated outputs. Across theoretical and empirical work, I outline the case for this approach and a potential psychological difficulty that may stand in the way of making it a reality.

ISBN: 9798515255367Subjects--Topical Terms:

529833
Behavioral sciences.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Artificial legal intelligence

Legal Data: Bias in the Law, and How Legal Technology Can Be Built to Help Correct for It.
LDR:02538nmm a2200385 4500 001 2283148
005 20211022115654.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798515255367
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28493034
035 $a AAI28493034
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Avery, Joseph J. $3 3383629
245 1 0 $a Legal Data: Bias in the Law, and How Legal Technology Can Be Built to Help Correct for It.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 262 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Cooper, Joel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a There is significant racial disparity in U.S. incarceration rates, with African Americans vastly overrepresented in prisons and jails. This was true a century and a half ago, and it is true today. Surprisingly, and in spite of decades of social psychological research, we still do not have clear answers to fundamental questions undergirding this fact: what accounts for the racially disproportionate rates of incarceration, and at what points in the criminal justice process does bias emerge, causing minority defendants to be treated differently than White defendants?In this dissertation, I cover three aspects of this problem. First, I consider bias in the law, focusing on the criminal justice actors most central to plea bargaining: criminal defense attorneys and prosecutors. I also focus on their decision making during a critical period: post-arrest and pretrial. Second, I consider stereotypes of criminal subtypes and what these stereotypes mean for legal decision making. Third, I propose that the most feasible and promising approach is to guide criminal justice actors' decision making through the use of machine-generated outputs. Across theoretical and empirical work, I outline the case for this approach and a potential psychological difficulty that may stand in the way of making it a reality.
590 $a School code: 0181.
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Artificial intelligence. $3 516317
653 $a Artificial legal intelligence
653 $a Criminal law
653 $a Criminal stereotypes
653 $a Empirical legal studies
653 $a Legal psychology
653 $a Legal technology
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0800
710 2 $a Princeton University. $b Psychology. $3 2101608
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-12B.
790 $a 0181
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28493034