語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
A Comparative Analysis: Coalitions o...
~
Zanzinger, Kristina.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
A Comparative Analysis: Coalitions of the LGBTQ+ and Abortion Rights Movement's in Argentina.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
A Comparative Analysis: Coalitions of the LGBTQ+ and Abortion Rights Movement's in Argentina./
作者:
Zanzinger, Kristina.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:
121 p.
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International82-08.
標題:
Political science. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28263388
ISBN:
9798557092364
A Comparative Analysis: Coalitions of the LGBTQ+ and Abortion Rights Movement's in Argentina.
Zanzinger, Kristina.
A Comparative Analysis: Coalitions of the LGBTQ+ and Abortion Rights Movement's in Argentina.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 121 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08.
Thesis (M.A.)--Georgetown University, 2020.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
My thesis looks at the factors which cause a social movement to achieve policy outcomes faster than others. My research shows how the internal dynamics of social movement coalitions influence the achievement of a movement's policy outcomes. I look at how the growth phase of a social movement allows us to examine the internal dynamics which contribute to a movements fast achievement of a policy goal. To center my argument I focus on the internal dynamics of ideologically convergent coalitions (ICC) and ideologically fragmented coalitions (IFC). I claim that the internal dynamics of a social movement are most visible during a coalitions growth phase - the first five-years after a network of social movement organizations is established - which shows us if a movement has ICC or IFC. If a movement has ICC it is more likely to achieve a policy goal; whereas, a movement with IFC is less-likely to achieve a policy goal because it is in a frozen state in need of reunification. To explain my argument I use of a case comparison of the LGBTQ+ and Abortion Rights movement's in Argentina from 2005 to 2020. My research shows that the LGBTQ+ movement is an ICC and the Abortion Rights movement is an IFC. My research finds that the internal dynamics of the LGBTQ+ and Abortion Rights coalitions defined each movement's ability to achieve a policy goal. The LGBTQ+ movement is used an example of an ICC with focus on the movement's direct legalization of same-sex-marriage and ability to achieve a policy goal. In comparison to the Abortion Rights movement, that is an example of an IFC, with focus on the movement's continued attempts to legalize/decriminalize abortion pushing it into a frozen state in need of reunification. I find that the Abortion Rights movement's continued attempts to legalize/decriminalize abortion - over the last 15 years - is an example of an IFC that was able to progress out of a frozen state and achieve reunification.
ISBN: 9798557092364Subjects--Topical Terms:
528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Abortion
A Comparative Analysis: Coalitions of the LGBTQ+ and Abortion Rights Movement's in Argentina.
LDR
:03151nmm a2200409 4500
001
2283077
005
20211022115637.5
008
220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798557092364
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28263388
035
$a
AAI28263388
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Zanzinger, Kristina.
$3
3561974
245
1 0
$a
A Comparative Analysis: Coalitions of the LGBTQ+ and Abortion Rights Movement's in Argentina.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2020
300
$a
121 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08.
500
$a
Advisor: Berman, Chantal.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--Georgetown University, 2020.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
My thesis looks at the factors which cause a social movement to achieve policy outcomes faster than others. My research shows how the internal dynamics of social movement coalitions influence the achievement of a movement's policy outcomes. I look at how the growth phase of a social movement allows us to examine the internal dynamics which contribute to a movements fast achievement of a policy goal. To center my argument I focus on the internal dynamics of ideologically convergent coalitions (ICC) and ideologically fragmented coalitions (IFC). I claim that the internal dynamics of a social movement are most visible during a coalitions growth phase - the first five-years after a network of social movement organizations is established - which shows us if a movement has ICC or IFC. If a movement has ICC it is more likely to achieve a policy goal; whereas, a movement with IFC is less-likely to achieve a policy goal because it is in a frozen state in need of reunification. To explain my argument I use of a case comparison of the LGBTQ+ and Abortion Rights movement's in Argentina from 2005 to 2020. My research shows that the LGBTQ+ movement is an ICC and the Abortion Rights movement is an IFC. My research finds that the internal dynamics of the LGBTQ+ and Abortion Rights coalitions defined each movement's ability to achieve a policy goal. The LGBTQ+ movement is used an example of an ICC with focus on the movement's direct legalization of same-sex-marriage and ability to achieve a policy goal. In comparison to the Abortion Rights movement, that is an example of an IFC, with focus on the movement's continued attempts to legalize/decriminalize abortion pushing it into a frozen state in need of reunification. I find that the Abortion Rights movement's continued attempts to legalize/decriminalize abortion - over the last 15 years - is an example of an IFC that was able to progress out of a frozen state and achieve reunification.
590
$a
School code: 0076.
650
4
$a
Political science.
$3
528916
650
4
$a
Latin American studies.
$3
2122903
650
4
$a
Sociology.
$3
516174
650
4
$a
LGBTQ studies.
$3
2122706
650
4
$a
Gender studies.
$3
2122708
650
4
$a
Public policy.
$3
532803
653
$a
Abortion
653
$a
Abortion rights
653
$a
Argentina
653
$a
LGBTQ+ community
653
$a
Social movements
690
$a
0615
690
$a
0550
690
$a
0626
690
$a
0630
690
$a
0733
690
$a
0492
710
2
$a
Georgetown University.
$b
Conflict Resolution.
$3
1674196
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
82-08.
790
$a
0076
791
$a
M.A.
792
$a
2020
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28263388
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9434810
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入