東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Meaning of Resilience to Psychol...

Abu-Rus, Ana.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Meaning of Resilience to Psychological Trauma: Agreement Among Physiological and Psychological Measurements.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Meaning of Resilience to Psychological Trauma: Agreement Among Physiological and Psychological Measurements./
作者:	Abu-Rus, Ana.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	166 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-12B.
標題:	Behavioral psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28543556
ISBN:	9798516925917

The Meaning of Resilience to Psychological Trauma: Agreement Among Physiological and Psychological Measurements.
Abu-Rus, Ana.

The Meaning of Resilience to Psychological Trauma: Agreement Among Physiological and Psychological Measurements. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 166 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Alliant International University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Research indicates that 80% of the population will experience a traumatic event in their lifetime, and yet less than 20% will develop a trauma-related diagnosis subsequent to the event (Breslau et al., 2014; Kilpatrick et al., 2013). In the resiliency literature, post-trauma resiliency has been conceptualized in both physiological and psychological ways. However, the relationship between physiological and psychological measures of resiliency is unclear. This study examined whether various psychological and physiological resilience definitions relate to each other and considered potential moderators (e.g., social support, emotion regulation, and working memory) of these relationships. It was hypothesized that physiological and psychological measures of resilience would correlate both within and across domains and that all measures of resiliency would relate to trauma history. Both physiological and psychological resilience were measured in multiple ways including the presence of a core symptom, the presence of any symptom, and rapid recovery from a stressor. A novel measure, dose-dependent resilience, was also created, defined as the degree to which an individual may have a positive residual in the prediction of physiological and psychological symptoms using trauma history. Although the two domains were internally coherent, results indicated that the psychological and physiological definitions of resilience did not reliably correlate, average r = .14, ns. Interestingly, the dose-dependency definitions had the highest mean inter-correlation with the other psychological (r =.81, p <.001) and physiological (r =.64, p <.001) resiliency definitions. Unexpectedly, frequency of traumatic experiences significantly correlated with some of the psychological definitions, r = .35, p < .001, but none of the physiological definitions; only social support moderated this relationship where those with low social support show a stronger relationship between resiliency and frequency of traumatic experiences than those with strong social support (betas = .175, p < .05 to .241, p < .05). Exploratory analyses revealed that the physiological variables correlated more strongly with each other for Caucasian or male participants than Asian/Pacific Islander or female participants. The findings of this study have implications regarding the need for assessment and targeted treatment of physiological symptoms in addition to psychological symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. More research should be dedicated towards examining the strengths and weaknesses of varying definitions.

ISBN: 9798516925917Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122788
Behavioral psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Dose-dependent

The Meaning of Resilience to Psychological Trauma: Agreement Among Physiological and Psychological Measurements.
LDR:03789nmm a2200373 4500 001 2281964
005 20210927083441.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798516925917
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28543556
035 $a AAI28543556
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Abu-Rus, Ana. $3 3560675
245 1 4 $a The Meaning of Resilience to Psychological Trauma: Agreement Among Physiological and Psychological Measurements.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 166 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Dalenberg, Constance.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Alliant International University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Research indicates that 80% of the population will experience a traumatic event in their lifetime, and yet less than 20% will develop a trauma-related diagnosis subsequent to the event (Breslau et al., 2014; Kilpatrick et al., 2013). In the resiliency literature, post-trauma resiliency has been conceptualized in both physiological and psychological ways. However, the relationship between physiological and psychological measures of resiliency is unclear. This study examined whether various psychological and physiological resilience definitions relate to each other and considered potential moderators (e.g., social support, emotion regulation, and working memory) of these relationships. It was hypothesized that physiological and psychological measures of resilience would correlate both within and across domains and that all measures of resiliency would relate to trauma history. Both physiological and psychological resilience were measured in multiple ways including the presence of a core symptom, the presence of any symptom, and rapid recovery from a stressor. A novel measure, dose-dependent resilience, was also created, defined as the degree to which an individual may have a positive residual in the prediction of physiological and psychological symptoms using trauma history. Although the two domains were internally coherent, results indicated that the psychological and physiological definitions of resilience did not reliably correlate, average r = .14, ns. Interestingly, the dose-dependency definitions had the highest mean inter-correlation with the other psychological (r =.81, p <.001) and physiological (r =.64, p <.001) resiliency definitions. Unexpectedly, frequency of traumatic experiences significantly correlated with some of the psychological definitions, r = .35, p < .001, but none of the physiological definitions; only social support moderated this relationship where those with low social support show a stronger relationship between resiliency and frequency of traumatic experiences than those with strong social support (betas = .175, p < .05 to .241, p < .05). Exploratory analyses revealed that the physiological variables correlated more strongly with each other for Caucasian or male participants than Asian/Pacific Islander or female participants. The findings of this study have implications regarding the need for assessment and targeted treatment of physiological symptoms in addition to psychological symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. More research should be dedicated towards examining the strengths and weaknesses of varying definitions.
590 $a School code: 1634.
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Physiological psychology. $3 2144820
650 4 $a Physiology. $3 518431
653 $a Dose-dependent
653 $a Heart Rate Variability
653 $a PTSD
653 $a Resilience
653 $a Trauma
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0989
690 $a 0719
710 2 $a Alliant International University. $b San Diego, CSPP. $3 2092448
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-12B.
790 $a 1634
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28543556