東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Prevalence and Effects of Scient...

Chinn, Sedona.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Prevalence and Effects of Scientific Agreement and Disagreement in Media.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Prevalence and Effects of Scientific Agreement and Disagreement in Media./
作者:	Chinn, Sedona.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	220 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-07B.
標題:	Journalism. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28240062
ISBN:	9798684625565

The Prevalence and Effects of Scientific Agreement and Disagreement in Media.
Chinn, Sedona.

The Prevalence and Effects of Scientific Agreement and Disagreement in Media. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 220 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Disagreement is inherent to the production of scientific knowledge, but its communication can erode the credibility of science in the eyes of the public. This tension pervades all science communication; however, under conditions of uncertainty it is most vital to act on knowledge about which experts are certain. To better understand how the public responds scientific agreement and disagreement, this dissertation investigates three questions that spring from previous work on the subject. It explores how much scientific disagreement the public is exposed to, how disagreement affects trust in science, and whether motivated perceptions of disagreement can be corrected by scientific agreement messages. The first study uses multiple computer-assisted content analytic methods to reveal that, in the last thirty years of climate change newspaper coverage, the prevalence of scientific agreement and disagreement have declined but denial messages have increased. The second study examines the effects of civil and uncivil scientific disagreement on a range of science attitudes in an online experiment. Compared to agreement messages, I find that disagreement and incivility not only negatively affect attention to and evaluation of scientific topics, but also trust in science and perceptions about the value of science. The final experiment reveals that agreement messages are insufficient to persuade those motivated by political identities of scientifically supported positions on climate change. It also highlights that debate about the efficacy of consensus messages in extant research comes in part from the choice by some researchers to pretest climate attitude measures. In sum, people are frequently exposed to messages about scientific disagreement in news, these messages negatively affect both issue attitudes and broader views about science, and agreement messages are not sufficient to reduce motivated perceptions of scientific disagreement on politicized issues. Understanding the ways in which the public responds to scientific disagreements is important because scientists have an ethical obligation to be honest about uncertainties. Additionally, increasingly competitive political and media systems are likely to amplify scientific disagreements in the public eye. Though trust in science remains high among the US public, this work shows that disagreement messages, amplified by politicization, can have consequences beyond a single issue contexts, with implications for public perceptions about the value of scientific knowledge in social and political life.

ISBN: 9798684625565Subjects--Topical Terms:

576107
Journalism.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Science communication

The Prevalence and Effects of Scientific Agreement and Disagreement in Media.
LDR:04108nmm a2200493 4500 001 2280634
005 20210907071117.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798684625565
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28240062
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umichrackham003339
035 $a AAI28240062
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chinn, Sedona. $3 3559170
245 1 4 $a The Prevalence and Effects of Scientific Agreement and Disagreement in Media.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 220 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Hart, Sol.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a Disagreement is inherent to the production of scientific knowledge, but its communication can erode the credibility of science in the eyes of the public. This tension pervades all science communication; however, under conditions of uncertainty it is most vital to act on knowledge about which experts are certain. To better understand how the public responds scientific agreement and disagreement, this dissertation investigates three questions that spring from previous work on the subject. It explores how much scientific disagreement the public is exposed to, how disagreement affects trust in science, and whether motivated perceptions of disagreement can be corrected by scientific agreement messages. The first study uses multiple computer-assisted content analytic methods to reveal that, in the last thirty years of climate change newspaper coverage, the prevalence of scientific agreement and disagreement have declined but denial messages have increased. The second study examines the effects of civil and uncivil scientific disagreement on a range of science attitudes in an online experiment. Compared to agreement messages, I find that disagreement and incivility not only negatively affect attention to and evaluation of scientific topics, but also trust in science and perceptions about the value of science. The final experiment reveals that agreement messages are insufficient to persuade those motivated by political identities of scientifically supported positions on climate change. It also highlights that debate about the efficacy of consensus messages in extant research comes in part from the choice by some researchers to pretest climate attitude measures. In sum, people are frequently exposed to messages about scientific disagreement in news, these messages negatively affect both issue attitudes and broader views about science, and agreement messages are not sufficient to reduce motivated perceptions of scientific disagreement on politicized issues. Understanding the ways in which the public responds to scientific disagreements is important because scientists have an ethical obligation to be honest about uncertainties. Additionally, increasingly competitive political and media systems are likely to amplify scientific disagreements in the public eye. Though trust in science remains high among the US public, this work shows that disagreement messages, amplified by politicization, can have consequences beyond a single issue contexts, with implications for public perceptions about the value of scientific knowledge in social and political life.
590 $a School code: 0127.
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 576107
650 4 $a Mass communications. $3 3422380
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
653 $a Science communication
653 $a Scientific consensus
653 $a Scientific disagreement
653 $a Scientific denial
653 $a Trust in science
653 $a Science disagreement in media
653 $a Science credibility
653 $a United States public
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0391
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0708
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $b Communication. $3 3352344
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-07B.
790 $a 0127
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28240062