東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Talking to Skeptics.

Goldhaber, Charles.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Talking to Skeptics.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Talking to Skeptics./
Author:	Goldhaber, Charles.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	194 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-11A.
Subject:	Skepticism. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28390744
ISBN:	9798569959143

Talking to Skeptics.
Goldhaber, Charles.

Talking to Skeptics. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 194 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Skeptics argue that we can know very little, threatening our claims to knowledge. Many philosophers now think there is no use in talking to skeptics-that nothing can change their minds, curing them of skepticism. These philosophers opt for mere prevention, aiming to convince only non-skeptics that skeptical arguments fail. I argue that a cure is needed, viable, and theoretically illuminating.First, I argue that the mere prevention of skepticism is likely to fail. To succeed, it would need to show why skeptical arguments appear compelling. Showing this either reveals that the arguments are compelling, demonstrating the need for cure, or reveals how they merely appear so, constituting a cure.Second, I show that we can change a skeptic's mind. I argue that influential arguments for skepticism about the external world all rely on a shared, tacit premise: that perception never guarantees that things are as we seem to perceive them to be. I then argue that arguments for this premise are question-begging. Showing the skeptic that her skepticism lacks foundation clears obstacles to her accepting, on ordinary grounds, a view on which perception can provide us with knowledge of how things are around us, thus curing her.Third, I argue that my cure helps us understand the nature, significance, and history of skepticism. For Hume, I explain, skepticism is a temperament, which leads to madness when overly dominant, but only carefulness when balanced with other temperaments. Tracing skepticism to a groundless intuition helps motivate Hume's focus on temperaments, while Hume's conception of proper temperamental balance helps to diagnose and moderate skepticism.I then argue that Kant tries to cure a skeptical empiricist not by showing skepticism's incoherence, but by offering an alternative explanation of our knowledge. Kant's portrayal of skepticism as arising from despair of understanding human knowledge explains why the skeptic is apt to find his alternative appealing, and teaches a general lesson about curing skepticism: Offering the skeptic a way to make sense of our knowledge allows him to overcome the frustration from which his skepticism arises.

ISBN: 9798569959143Subjects--Topical Terms:

564682
Skepticism.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Prevention of skepticism

Talking to Skeptics.
LDR:03281nmm a2200337 4500 001 2280460
005 20210827095956.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798569959143
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28390744
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Pittsburgh39726
035 $a AAI28390744
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Goldhaber, Charles. $3 3558982
245 1 0 $a Talking to Skeptics.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 194 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Schafer, Karl;Shaw, James;Engstrom, Stephen;McDowell, John.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Skeptics argue that we can know very little, threatening our claims to knowledge. Many philosophers now think there is no use in talking to skeptics-that nothing can change their minds, curing them of skepticism. These philosophers opt for mere prevention, aiming to convince only non-skeptics that skeptical arguments fail. I argue that a cure is needed, viable, and theoretically illuminating.First, I argue that the mere prevention of skepticism is likely to fail. To succeed, it would need to show why skeptical arguments appear compelling. Showing this either reveals that the arguments are compelling, demonstrating the need for cure, or reveals how they merely appear so, constituting a cure.Second, I show that we can change a skeptic's mind. I argue that influential arguments for skepticism about the external world all rely on a shared, tacit premise: that perception never guarantees that things are as we seem to perceive them to be. I then argue that arguments for this premise are question-begging. Showing the skeptic that her skepticism lacks foundation clears obstacles to her accepting, on ordinary grounds, a view on which perception can provide us with knowledge of how things are around us, thus curing her.Third, I argue that my cure helps us understand the nature, significance, and history of skepticism. For Hume, I explain, skepticism is a temperament, which leads to madness when overly dominant, but only carefulness when balanced with other temperaments. Tracing skepticism to a groundless intuition helps motivate Hume's focus on temperaments, while Hume's conception of proper temperamental balance helps to diagnose and moderate skepticism.I then argue that Kant tries to cure a skeptical empiricist not by showing skepticism's incoherence, but by offering an alternative explanation of our knowledge. Kant's portrayal of skepticism as arising from despair of understanding human knowledge explains why the skeptic is apt to find his alternative appealing, and teaches a general lesson about curing skepticism: Offering the skeptic a way to make sense of our knowledge allows him to overcome the frustration from which his skepticism arises.
590 $a School code: 0178.
650 4 $a Skepticism. $3 564682
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Philosophers. $3 558041
653 $a Prevention of skepticism
653 $a Proper temperamental balance
653 $a Curing skepticism
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a University of Pittsburgh. $3 958527
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-11A.
790 $a 0178
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28390744