東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Rules of Material Inference Theo...

Schultchen, Jason.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Rules of Material Inference Theory of Deep Disagreements.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Rules of Material Inference Theory of Deep Disagreements./
Author:	Schultchen, Jason.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	127 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-12.
Subject:	Philosophy. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27963717
ISBN:	9798641245607

The Rules of Material Inference Theory of Deep Disagreements.
Schultchen, Jason.

The Rules of Material Inference Theory of Deep Disagreements. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 127 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Lethbridge (Canada), 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Robert Fogelin's problem of deep disagreements is the existence of certain disagreements in which arriving at an agreement by way of argumentation can appear impossible, even if the disagreeing parties are mutually committed to achieving a resolution through earnest argumentation. The essential feature of a deep disagreement is a clash of "underlying principles" which leads the interlocutors to an impasse with respect to deciding upon a means of resolving their disagreement. How we answer the question of whether there is room for effective argumentation in deep disagreements turns upon our understanding of the aforementioned underlying principles. I offer one possible theory of deep disagreements wherein the underlying principles at issue are construed as Wilfrid Sellars's rules of material inference. My claim is that this Sellarsian take on deep disagreements effectively captures Fogelin's problem while leaving room for optimism about the various roles that argumentation might play in a deep disagreement.

ISBN: 9798641245607Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Robert Fogelin

The Rules of Material Inference Theory of Deep Disagreements.
LDR:02180nmm a2200397 4500 001 2280391
005 20210827095938.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798641245607
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27963717
035 $a AAI27963717
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Schultchen, Jason. $3 3558905
245 1 4 $a The Rules of Material Inference Theory of Deep Disagreements.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 127 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.
500 $a Advisor: Brown, Bryson.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Lethbridge (Canada), 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Robert Fogelin's problem of deep disagreements is the existence of certain disagreements in which arriving at an agreement by way of argumentation can appear impossible, even if the disagreeing parties are mutually committed to achieving a resolution through earnest argumentation. The essential feature of a deep disagreement is a clash of "underlying principles" which leads the interlocutors to an impasse with respect to deciding upon a means of resolving their disagreement. How we answer the question of whether there is room for effective argumentation in deep disagreements turns upon our understanding of the aforementioned underlying principles. I offer one possible theory of deep disagreements wherein the underlying principles at issue are construed as Wilfrid Sellars's rules of material inference. My claim is that this Sellarsian take on deep disagreements effectively captures Fogelin's problem while leaving room for optimism about the various roles that argumentation might play in a deep disagreement.
590 $a School code: 1112.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
650 4 $a Logic. $3 529544
653 $a Robert Fogelin
653 $a Logic
653 $a Argumentation
653 $a Pragmatism
653 $a Reasoning
653 $a Wilfrid Sellars
653 $a Thought
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0393
690 $a 0395
710 2 $a University of Lethbridge (Canada). $b Philosophy. $3 3558906
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-12.
790 $a 1112
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27963717