東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Admissibility in Roman-canon Procedu...

Sullivan, William Peyton.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Admissibility in Roman-canon Procedure: the Emergence of the Law of Positions.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Admissibility in Roman-canon Procedure: the Emergence of the Law of Positions./
Author:	Sullivan, William Peyton.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	318 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-01A.
Subject:	Medieval history. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27545456
ISBN:	9798662395992

Admissibility in Roman-canon Procedure: the Emergence of the Law of Positions.
Sullivan, William Peyton.

Admissibility in Roman-canon Procedure: the Emergence of the Law of Positions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 318 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation studies the circumstances under which explicit norms of evidentiary admissibility were adopted in twelfth- and thirteenth-century Roman-canon procedure. I demonstrate that norms of admissibility arose in two areas: the law of positions and the law of witnesses. I argue that these norms first emerged in Roman-canon procedure to mitigate the problems caused by shifting a measure of control over examination of parties and witnesses from the adjudicator to the parties themselves. I focus in particular on the problem of parties' abusive examination of their opponents and the problem of parties' tendency to produce evidence that did not serve the fact finder's informational needs.

ISBN: 9798662395992Subjects--Topical Terms:

3173905
Medieval history.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Canon law

Admissibility in Roman-canon Procedure: the Emergence of the Law of Positions.
LDR:01890nmm a2200385 4500 001 2278328
005 20210628074959.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798662395992
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27545456
035 $a AAI27545456
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sullivan, William Peyton. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-9025-1027 $3 3556706
245 1 0 $a Admissibility in Roman-canon Procedure: the Emergence of the Law of Positions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 318 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Ando, Clifford;Fasolt, Constantin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation studies the circumstances under which explicit norms of evidentiary admissibility were adopted in twelfth- and thirteenth-century Roman-canon procedure. I demonstrate that norms of admissibility arose in two areas: the law of positions and the law of witnesses. I argue that these norms first emerged in Roman-canon procedure to mitigate the problems caused by shifting a measure of control over examination of parties and witnesses from the adjudicator to the parties themselves. I focus in particular on the problem of parties' abusive examination of their opponents and the problem of parties' tendency to produce evidence that did not serve the fact finder's informational needs.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Medieval history. $3 3173905
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a European history. $2 bicssc $3 1972904
653 $a Canon law
653 $a Evidence
653 $a Positions
653 $a Roman law
653 $a Roman-canon procedure
653 $a Witnesses
690 $a 0581
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0335
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b Classics and History. $3 3556707
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-01A.
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27545456