東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Performance management: Proponents a...

Ulatowski, Josephina.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Performance management: Proponents and critics of the performance appraisal A position paper.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Performance management: Proponents and critics of the performance appraisal A position paper./
Author:	Ulatowski, Josephina.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2012,
Description:	63 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 74-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International74-02.
Subject:	Labor relations. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1514858
ISBN:	9781267480002

Performance management: Proponents and critics of the performance appraisal A position paper.
Ulatowski, Josephina.

Performance management: Proponents and critics of the performance appraisal A position paper. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2012 - 63 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 74-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--State University of New York Empire State College, 2012.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Performance evaluation, a process by which a manager or supervisor evaluates an employee, is widely touted by human resource scholars, professionals, and practitioners. It is also sharply criticized by others. Research to find possible solutions to the flaws and to silence critics of the process exists. The results and findings show there are problems that both the proponents and critics recognize within the appraisal process and that currently there does seem to be an overall solution to resolve these issues and make this a more favorable process in the work environment.

ISBN: 9781267480002Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172144
Labor relations.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Performance appraisal

Performance management: Proponents and critics of the performance appraisal A position paper.
LDR:01687nmm a2200325 4500 001 2278325
005 20210628074958.5
008 220723s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267480002
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1514858
035 $a (MiAaPQ)esc:10135
035 $a AAI1514858
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ulatowski, Josephina. $3 3556704
245 1 0 $a Performance management: Proponents and critics of the performance appraisal A position paper.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2012
300 $a 63 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 74-02.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Keeran, Roger;Russell, Jason.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--State University of New York Empire State College, 2012.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Performance evaluation, a process by which a manager or supervisor evaluates an employee, is widely touted by human resource scholars, professionals, and practitioners. It is also sharply criticized by others. Research to find possible solutions to the flaws and to silence critics of the process exists. The results and findings show there are problems that both the proponents and critics recognize within the appraisal process and that currently there does seem to be an overall solution to resolve these issues and make this a more favorable process in the work environment.
590 $a School code: 1408.
650 4 $a Labor relations. $3 3172144
653 $a Performance appraisal
690 $a 0629
710 2 $a State University of New York Empire State College. $b Labor and Policy Studies. $3 1671834
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 74-02.
790 $a 1408
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1514858