東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Durability of Client Regimes: Fo...

Casey, Adam Erickson.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Durability of Client Regimes: Foreign Sponsorship and Autocracies, 1946-2010.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Durability of Client Regimes: Foreign Sponsorship and Autocracies, 1946-2010./
作者:	Casey, Adam Erickson.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	296 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-06A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27993863
ISBN:	9798698544630

The Durability of Client Regimes: Foreign Sponsorship and Autocracies, 1946-2010.
Casey, Adam Erickson.

The Durability of Client Regimes: Foreign Sponsorship and Autocracies, 1946-2010. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 296 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation investigates the relationship between foreign support and the survival of authoritarian regimes. Conventional wisdom suggests that great power patrons prop up client dictatorships. However, this is generally assumed rather than systematically analyzed. My dissertation provides the first comprehensive assessment of the relationship between foreign sponsorship and authoritarian regime survival with the use of an original dataset of all autocratic client regimes in the postwar period. These results demonstrate that patronage from Western powers - the United States, France, and the United Kingdom - is not associated with client regime survival. Instead, only Soviet sponsorship reduces the risk of regime collapse. I explain this variation by considering the effects of differing strategies of foreign sponsorship on client regime coup vulnerability. Not a single Soviet client regime ever lost power to a military coup. This was the result of Soviet assistance in the implementation of highly penetrative coup prevention strategies that rendered militaries incapable of ousting incumbent regimes. In contrast, a fundamental ambivalence toward their autocratic allies and a focus on building Western-style militaries rendered U.S. and European clients highly vulnerable to coups. Western clients did not receive patron assistance in restructuring their security forces to prevent a coup and were abandoned in the event of a successful coup. I test these arguments using recently declassified archival sources, secondary sources in English and Russian, and a series of statistical analyses using both original and newly available data.

ISBN: 9798698544630Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Authoritarianism

The Durability of Client Regimes: Foreign Sponsorship and Autocracies, 1946-2010.
LDR:02863nmm a2200385 4500 001 2277607
005 20210521102448.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798698544630
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27993863
035 $a AAI27993863
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Casey, Adam Erickson. $3 3555928
245 1 4 $a The Durability of Client Regimes: Foreign Sponsorship and Autocracies, 1946-2010.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 296 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Way, Lucan Ahmad.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation investigates the relationship between foreign support and the survival of authoritarian regimes. Conventional wisdom suggests that great power patrons prop up client dictatorships. However, this is generally assumed rather than systematically analyzed. My dissertation provides the first comprehensive assessment of the relationship between foreign sponsorship and authoritarian regime survival with the use of an original dataset of all autocratic client regimes in the postwar period. These results demonstrate that patronage from Western powers - the United States, France, and the United Kingdom - is not associated with client regime survival. Instead, only Soviet sponsorship reduces the risk of regime collapse. I explain this variation by considering the effects of differing strategies of foreign sponsorship on client regime coup vulnerability. Not a single Soviet client regime ever lost power to a military coup. This was the result of Soviet assistance in the implementation of highly penetrative coup prevention strategies that rendered militaries incapable of ousting incumbent regimes. In contrast, a fundamental ambivalence toward their autocratic allies and a focus on building Western-style militaries rendered U.S. and European clients highly vulnerable to coups. Western clients did not receive patron assistance in restructuring their security forces to prevent a coup and were abandoned in the event of a successful coup. I test these arguments using recently declassified archival sources, secondary sources in English and Russian, and a series of statistical analyses using both original and newly available data.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
650 4 $a Military history. $3 552332
653 $a Authoritarianism
653 $a Civil-military relations
653 $a Cold War
653 $a Great power foreign policy
653 $a Military coups
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0750
690 $a 0722
690 $a 0601
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Political Science. $3 2096204
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-06A.
790 $a 0779
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27993863