東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Asymmetry, Volatility, and Escalatio...

Wells, Simon.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Asymmetry, Volatility, and Escalation: The Potential for American Military Responses to Chinese Offensive Action in Space.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Asymmetry, Volatility, and Escalation: The Potential for American Military Responses to Chinese Offensive Action in Space./
作者:	Wells, Simon.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	72 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-10.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-10.
標題:	International relations. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27836733
ISBN:	9798607327392

Asymmetry, Volatility, and Escalation: The Potential for American Military Responses to Chinese Offensive Action in Space.
Wells, Simon.

Asymmetry, Volatility, and Escalation: The Potential for American Military Responses to Chinese Offensive Action in Space. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 72 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-10.

Thesis (M.A.)--Royal Roads University (Canada), 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The potential for conflict in space or related to space systems is an under-researched issue. Space conflict could dramatically affect States and individuals, and therefore can be situated in the escalation, great power rivalry, and human security bodies of knowledge. A normative policy analysis of the potential for conflict resulting from space contestation between the United States and China will seek to determine if volatility in space is qualifiable. Using the stated positions of the U.S. and China, inquiries into strategic priorities, hazards and risk, and legal mechanisms for conflict escalation aim to pragmatically respond to this gap and indicate where, if at all, potential for space conflict escalation exists. A discussion of the results situates them within the strategic rivalry between the United States and China and leads to practical recommendations for further research in this new set of problems in a new domain.

ISBN: 9798607327392Subjects--Topical Terms:

531762
International relations.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Asymmetric conflict

Asymmetry, Volatility, and Escalation: The Potential for American Military Responses to Chinese Offensive Action in Space.
LDR:02108nmm a2200373 4500 001 2277473
005 20210521102004.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798607327392
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27836733
035 $a AAI27836733
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wells, Simon. $3 3555791
245 1 0 $a Asymmetry, Volatility, and Escalation: The Potential for American Military Responses to Chinese Offensive Action in Space.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 72 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-10.
500 $a Advisor: Kampmark, Binoy.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Royal Roads University (Canada), 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The potential for conflict in space or related to space systems is an under-researched issue. Space conflict could dramatically affect States and individuals, and therefore can be situated in the escalation, great power rivalry, and human security bodies of knowledge. A normative policy analysis of the potential for conflict resulting from space contestation between the United States and China will seek to determine if volatility in space is qualifiable. Using the stated positions of the U.S. and China, inquiries into strategic priorities, hazards and risk, and legal mechanisms for conflict escalation aim to pragmatically respond to this gap and indicate where, if at all, potential for space conflict escalation exists. A discussion of the results situates them within the strategic rivalry between the United States and China and leads to practical recommendations for further research in this new set of problems in a new domain.
590 $a School code: 1313.
650 4 $a International relations. $3 531762
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
653 $a Asymmetric conflict
653 $a Interdependence
653 $a Policy
653 $a Security
653 $a Space
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0750
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a Royal Roads University (Canada). $b School of Humanitarian Studies. $3 3284913
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-10.
790 $a 1313
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27836733