東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Counterterrorism and Human Rights Co...

Gravely, Janice Marie.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Counterterrorism and Human Rights Committees' Influence on Terrorism and Human Rights Atrocities = = Les comites du contre-terrorisme et des droits de l'homme sur le terrorisme et les atrocites des droits de l'homme.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Counterterrorism and Human Rights Committees' Influence on Terrorism and Human Rights Atrocities =/
其他題名:	Les comites du contre-terrorisme et des droits de l'homme sur le terrorisme et les atrocites des droits de l'homme.
作者:	Gravely, Janice Marie.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	177 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-06A.
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27549310
ISBN:	9781392795613

Counterterrorism and Human Rights Committees' Influence on Terrorism and Human Rights Atrocities = = Les comites du contre-terrorisme et des droits de l'homme sur le terrorisme et les atrocites des droits de l'homme.
Gravely, Janice Marie.

Counterterrorism and Human Rights Committees' Influence on Terrorism and Human Rights Atrocities =Les comites du contre-terrorisme et des droits de l'homme sur le terrorisme et les atrocites des droits de l'homme. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 177 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The United Nations Counterterrorism and Human Rights Committees' current collaborative practices have failed to reduce global terrorists' activities and human rights abuses associated with counterterrorism activities. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore and compare collaborative processes between the committees in combatting terrorism and human rights violations associated with counterterrorism. The researched was centered around two key questions: The similarities and differences with information sharing processes and the impacts of the committees' collaborative processes on terrorists' activities and human rights violations. For this study, the pragmatic paradigm theoretical framework was used, focusing on the descriptive exploratory design. Secondary data was used as a source. Additionally, face-to-face and telephonic interviews with subject matter experts were conducted. Eclectic coding was used as the primary coding methodology to integrate other coding methodologies in the analysis process. The research concluded that the current multidisciplinary collaborative process used by the United Nations Counterterrorism Committee and Human Rights Committee creates inefficiencies that enable terrorists' activities to adapt while reinforcing their terrorist message. Strategically integrating the interdisciplinary process within both committees could expand each committee's awareness and efficiency in specified areas while positively reducing terrorist activities and human rights violations. Developing an appreciation and understanding beyond one's individual expertise while melding expert considerations is the basis of the interdisciplinary process that can positively effect social change for a more stable international forum.

ISBN: 9781392795613Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Collaboration

Counterterrorism and Human Rights Committees' Influence on Terrorism and Human Rights Atrocities = = Les comites du contre-terrorisme et des droits de l'homme sur le terrorisme et les atrocites des droits de l'homme.
LDR:05260nmm a2200421 4500 001 2277432
005 20210521101955.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392795613
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27549310
035 $a AAI27549310
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gravely, Janice Marie. $3 3555747
245 1 0 $a Counterterrorism and Human Rights Committees' Influence on Terrorism and Human Rights Atrocities = $b Les comites du contre-terrorisme et des droits de l'homme sur le terrorisme et les atrocites des droits de l'homme.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 177 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-06, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Pascarella, Joseph.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The United Nations Counterterrorism and Human Rights Committees' current collaborative practices have failed to reduce global terrorists' activities and human rights abuses associated with counterterrorism activities. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore and compare collaborative processes between the committees in combatting terrorism and human rights violations associated with counterterrorism. The researched was centered around two key questions: The similarities and differences with information sharing processes and the impacts of the committees' collaborative processes on terrorists' activities and human rights violations. For this study, the pragmatic paradigm theoretical framework was used, focusing on the descriptive exploratory design. Secondary data was used as a source. Additionally, face-to-face and telephonic interviews with subject matter experts were conducted. Eclectic coding was used as the primary coding methodology to integrate other coding methodologies in the analysis process. The research concluded that the current multidisciplinary collaborative process used by the United Nations Counterterrorism Committee and Human Rights Committee creates inefficiencies that enable terrorists' activities to adapt while reinforcing their terrorist message. Strategically integrating the interdisciplinary process within both committees could expand each committee's awareness and efficiency in specified areas while positively reducing terrorist activities and human rights violations. Developing an appreciation and understanding beyond one's individual expertise while melding expert considerations is the basis of the interdisciplinary process that can positively effect social change for a more stable international forum.
520 $a Les pratiques de collaboration actuelles des comites des Nations Unies contre le terrorisme et des droits de l'homme n'ont pas permis de reduire les activites des terroristes et les violations des droits de l'homme liees aux activites de lutte contre le terrorisme. Le but de cette etude de cas qualitative etait d'explorer et de comparer les processus de collaboration entre les comites dans la lutte contre le terrorisme et les violations des droits de l'homme associees a la lutte contre le terrorisme. Les recherches ont porte sur deux questions cles: les similitudes et les differences entre les processus de partage d'informations et les effets des processus de collaboration des comites sur les activites des terroristes et les violations des droits de l'homme. Pour cette etude, le cadre theorique du paradigme pragmatique a ete utilise, en se concentrant sur la conception exploratoire descriptive. Les donnees secondaires ont ete utilisees comme source. Des entretiens telephoniques et en face a face avec des experts en la matiere ont egalement ete menes. Le codage eclectique a ete utilise comme principale methode de codage pour integrer d'autres methodologies de codage dans le processus d'analyse. L'etude a conclu que le processus de collaboration multidisciplinaire actuellement utilise par le Comite des Nations Unies contre le terrorisme et le Comite des droits de l'homme creait des inefficacites permettant aux activites des terroristes de s'adapter tout en renforcant leur message terroriste. L'integration strategique du processus interdisciplinaire dans les deux comites pourrait accroitre la prise de conscience et l'efficacite de chaque comite dans des domaines specifiques tout en reduisant de maniere positive les activites terroristes et les violations des droits de l'homme. Developper une appreciation et une comprehension allant au-dela de l'expertise individuelle tout en combinant des considerations d'expert est la base du processus interdisciplinaire qui peut avoir un effet positif sur le changement social pour un forum international plus stable.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a International relations. $3 531762
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
653 $a Collaboration
653 $a Collaborate
653 $a Collaborative
653 $a Counterterrorism
653 $a Human Rights
653 $a Interdisciplinary
653 $a Terrorism
653 $a United Nations
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Public Policy and Administration. $3 1026795
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-06A.
790 $a 0543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27549310