東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Social Networks, Social Support, and...

Chen, Hui.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Social Networks, Social Support, and Information Disclosure on Social Media for Illness.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Social Networks, Social Support, and Information Disclosure on Social Media for Illness./
Author:	Chen, Hui.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	138 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-03A.
Subject:	Sociology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28087752
ISBN:	9798672151403

Social Networks, Social Support, and Information Disclosure on Social Media for Illness.
Chen, Hui.

Social Networks, Social Support, and Information Disclosure on Social Media for Illness. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 138 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

People have increasingly used social media for coping with illness, such as finding health information, seeking support, and connecting with others. Social support and social network theories suggest that social media extends people's traditional offline support networks. Patients who cannot receive adequate support from their families and friends can turn to a larger network of individuals with similar experiences and health conditions. Additionally, computer-mediated communication literature argues that the anonymity of social media allows people who are reluctant to seek support in face-to-face settings to self-disclose in online settings. Stigmatized individuals feel more comfortable and secure to voice their thoughts and seek support on social media. This dissertation focuses on the aspects of social relationships, social support, and information disclosure on social media for illness. It aims to test hypotheses motivated from the theorizing about (1) social relationships and health, and (2) anonymity and self-disclosure. I conduct three empirical studies to address these two themes.Chapters 4 and 5 examine the relationship between users' online network structure and participation at the individual and group levels respectively. Chapter 4 tests hypotheses that users' network structure is associated with posting activity and sentiment. Using data from Twitter, I find that users who are more advantaged in network structure (e.g., degree, density) are more active in posting behaviors (e.g., posting volume). But no significant associations are found between network structure and posting sentiment. Chapter 5 tests hypotheses that groups' network structure is associated with group retention. Using data from an online health forum, I find that denser, closer and smaller networks have higher retention rates. Chapter 6 examines the relationship among anonymity, stigma, and self-disclosure. Using Twitter data, I assess hypotheses that anonymous patients are more likely to self-disclose. For anonymous users (compared with identifiable users), the more stigmatized their illness is, the more they self-disclose. I find a significant association between anonymity and health-related posts among cancer users, but not among depression users. Contradictory to my hypotheses, among anonymous users, cancer users (i.e., less stigmatized) are more likely to produce content related to support or health than depression users (i.e., more stigmatized).

ISBN: 9798672151403Subjects--Topical Terms:

516174
Sociology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Social media

Social Networks, Social Support, and Information Disclosure on Social Media for Illness.
LDR:03586nmm a2200349 4500 001 2277361
005 20210521101706.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798672151403
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28087752
035 $a AAI28087752
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chen, Hui. $3 1084303
245 1 0 $a Social Networks, Social Support, and Information Disclosure on Social Media for Illness.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 138 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Rojas, Fabio;Hara, Noriko.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a People have increasingly used social media for coping with illness, such as finding health information, seeking support, and connecting with others. Social support and social network theories suggest that social media extends people's traditional offline support networks. Patients who cannot receive adequate support from their families and friends can turn to a larger network of individuals with similar experiences and health conditions. Additionally, computer-mediated communication literature argues that the anonymity of social media allows people who are reluctant to seek support in face-to-face settings to self-disclose in online settings. Stigmatized individuals feel more comfortable and secure to voice their thoughts and seek support on social media. This dissertation focuses on the aspects of social relationships, social support, and information disclosure on social media for illness. It aims to test hypotheses motivated from the theorizing about (1) social relationships and health, and (2) anonymity and self-disclosure. I conduct three empirical studies to address these two themes.Chapters 4 and 5 examine the relationship between users' online network structure and participation at the individual and group levels respectively. Chapter 4 tests hypotheses that users' network structure is associated with posting activity and sentiment. Using data from Twitter, I find that users who are more advantaged in network structure (e.g., degree, density) are more active in posting behaviors (e.g., posting volume). But no significant associations are found between network structure and posting sentiment. Chapter 5 tests hypotheses that groups' network structure is associated with group retention. Using data from an online health forum, I find that denser, closer and smaller networks have higher retention rates. Chapter 6 examines the relationship among anonymity, stigma, and self-disclosure. Using Twitter data, I assess hypotheses that anonymous patients are more likely to self-disclose. For anonymous users (compared with identifiable users), the more stigmatized their illness is, the more they self-disclose. I find a significant association between anonymity and health-related posts among cancer users, but not among depression users. Contradictory to my hypotheses, among anonymous users, cancer users (i.e., less stigmatized) are more likely to produce content related to support or health than depression users (i.e., more stigmatized).
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
653 $a Social media
653 $a Social network
653 $a Social support
653 $a Illnesses
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b Sociology. $3 1030156
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-03A.
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28087752