東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

What Enemy Hath Done This? The Death...

Johnston, Savannah Eccles.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What Enemy Hath Done This? The Death of the Fusion Movement and the Rise of Illiberal Conservatism.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What Enemy Hath Done This? The Death of the Fusion Movement and the Rise of Illiberal Conservatism./
作者:	Johnston, Savannah Eccles.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	231 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-11.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-11.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27836714
ISBN:	9798645447151

What Enemy Hath Done This? The Death of the Fusion Movement and the Rise of Illiberal Conservatism.
Johnston, Savannah Eccles.

What Enemy Hath Done This? The Death of the Fusion Movement and the Rise of Illiberal Conservatism. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 231 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-11.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Claremont Graduate University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The modern conservative movement, also known as the fusion, is the result of a powerful anti-communist coalition constructed in the late 1950s. The fusion movement sought to bring two competing schools of political thought, traditionalist conservatism and classical liberalism, into a coalition powerful enough to fight communism abroad and thwart progressivism at home. These two traditions are unlikely and unnatural allies, for they disagree on fundamental questions, such as the purpose of government, human nature, the meaning of equality, and the definition of freedom. In fact, traditionalist conservatism has long been deeply critical of the liberal project.The implications of this deep theoretical division among conservatives were largely masked by the fusion's united front against communism. For forty years, the movement largely towed the line of the compromise, emphasizing social conservatism, muscular internationalism, and free market economics. With the downfall of communism, the theoretical divide within the fusion movement between traditionalist conservatives and classical liberals became more pronounced. The moderating influence of the fusion gave way to a push for theoretical purity in the absence of a common enemy, and external factors such as the rise of new media and the neoconservatives' fall from grace in the mid 2000s made room at the table for more radical segments. This dissertation demonstrates how modern conservatism was always theoretically divided and how illiberalism - or the theoretical critique of liberalism - has slowly gained the upper hand within the conservative intellectual movement. Using the archives of National Review, the preeminent conservative publication and guardian of the fusion movement, this dissertation traces the growing divide between the two traditions and the concomitant rise of illiberalism through the development of key concepts and policies, including nationhood and immigration, free markets and trade, and the role of the state in reinforcing tradition and morality.

ISBN: 9798645447151Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

American political thought

What Enemy Hath Done This? The Death of the Fusion Movement and the Rise of Illiberal Conservatism.
LDR:03170nmm a2200349 4500 001 2275212
005 20201202130435.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798645447151
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27836714
035 $a AAI27836714
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Johnston, Savannah Eccles. $3 3553453
245 1 0 $a What Enemy Hath Done This? The Death of the Fusion Movement and the Rise of Illiberal Conservatism.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 231 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-11.
500 $a Advisor: Schroedel, Jean R.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Claremont Graduate University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The modern conservative movement, also known as the fusion, is the result of a powerful anti-communist coalition constructed in the late 1950s. The fusion movement sought to bring two competing schools of political thought, traditionalist conservatism and classical liberalism, into a coalition powerful enough to fight communism abroad and thwart progressivism at home. These two traditions are unlikely and unnatural allies, for they disagree on fundamental questions, such as the purpose of government, human nature, the meaning of equality, and the definition of freedom. In fact, traditionalist conservatism has long been deeply critical of the liberal project.The implications of this deep theoretical division among conservatives were largely masked by the fusion's united front against communism. For forty years, the movement largely towed the line of the compromise, emphasizing social conservatism, muscular internationalism, and free market economics. With the downfall of communism, the theoretical divide within the fusion movement between traditionalist conservatives and classical liberals became more pronounced. The moderating influence of the fusion gave way to a push for theoretical purity in the absence of a common enemy, and external factors such as the rise of new media and the neoconservatives' fall from grace in the mid 2000s made room at the table for more radical segments. This dissertation demonstrates how modern conservatism was always theoretically divided and how illiberalism - or the theoretical critique of liberalism - has slowly gained the upper hand within the conservative intellectual movement. Using the archives of National Review, the preeminent conservative publication and guardian of the fusion movement, this dissertation traces the growing divide between the two traditions and the concomitant rise of illiberalism through the development of key concepts and policies, including nationhood and immigration, free markets and trade, and the role of the state in reinforcing tradition and morality.
590 $a School code: 0047.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a American studies. $3 2122720
653 $a American political thought
653 $a Conservatism
653 $a Fusion
653 $a Illiberal
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0323
710 2 $a The Claremont Graduate University. $b School of Social Science, Politics, and Evaluation. $3 3541184
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-11.
790 $a 0047
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27836714