東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Equity in Public Funding for Arts an...

Carmel, Nadav.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Equity in Public Funding for Arts and Culture in Philadelphia.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Equity in Public Funding for Arts and Culture in Philadelphia./
作者:	Carmel, Nadav.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	95 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International79-12.
標題:	Arts Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10822309
ISBN:	9780438041820

Equity in Public Funding for Arts and Culture in Philadelphia.
Carmel, Nadav.

Equity in Public Funding for Arts and Culture in Philadelphia. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 95 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12.

Thesis (M.S.)--Drexel University, 2018.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

Is the distribution of public arts funding in Philadelphia equitable? Despite the ascendance of diversity, equity, and inclusion as a sector-wide goal and anecdotal evidence of equity issues in the distributive patterns of both foundation and government grantmaking, issues of distributive equity in US philanthropy have been little studied. What research does exist paints a picture of affluent, white, Eurocentric arts nonprofits dominating the funding landscape to the detriment of small, underrepresented, or otherwise marginalized arts nonprofits. By their mandate, government funders should be more accessible to these kinds of organizations, but are they? In Philadelphia a unique tool exists in CultureBlocks, a website that maps public arts grantees against Census-derived demographic data. Using this tool, the question of the distributive equity of public arts funding in Philadelphia was explored statistically via four different equity standards from the geography literature. While this study could not conclusively affirm or deny that public arts funding in Philadelphia from 2007-2015 was distributed equitably, the data showed no significant correlations between the demographics of a particular area (as a proxy for the demographics of the organizations in that area) and the average percentage of public arts funding received by the arts nonprofits in that area. This lends credence to claims that public arts funding is generally more accessible to small and underrepresented arts organizations, and so may be distributed more equitably, but more research needs to be conducted to fill the research gap. The hope is that this study creates more avenues to further that conversation.

ISBN: 9780438041820Subjects--Topical Terms:

3423886
Arts Management.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Distributive

Equity in Public Funding for Arts and Culture in Philadelphia.
LDR:02958nmm a2200409 4500 001 2273401
005 20201109122525.5
008 220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438041820
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10822309
035 $a (MiAaPQ)drexel:11395
035 $a AAI10822309
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Carmel, Nadav. $3 3550841
245 1 0 $a Equity in Public Funding for Arts and Culture in Philadelphia.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 95 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Goodman, Julie.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Drexel University, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Is the distribution of public arts funding in Philadelphia equitable? Despite the ascendance of diversity, equity, and inclusion as a sector-wide goal and anecdotal evidence of equity issues in the distributive patterns of both foundation and government grantmaking, issues of distributive equity in US philanthropy have been little studied. What research does exist paints a picture of affluent, white, Eurocentric arts nonprofits dominating the funding landscape to the detriment of small, underrepresented, or otherwise marginalized arts nonprofits. By their mandate, government funders should be more accessible to these kinds of organizations, but are they? In Philadelphia a unique tool exists in CultureBlocks, a website that maps public arts grantees against Census-derived demographic data. Using this tool, the question of the distributive equity of public arts funding in Philadelphia was explored statistically via four different equity standards from the geography literature. While this study could not conclusively affirm or deny that public arts funding in Philadelphia from 2007-2015 was distributed equitably, the data showed no significant correlations between the demographics of a particular area (as a proxy for the demographics of the organizations in that area) and the average percentage of public arts funding received by the arts nonprofits in that area. This lends credence to claims that public arts funding is generally more accessible to small and underrepresented arts organizations, and so may be distributed more equitably, but more research needs to be conducted to fill the research gap. The hope is that this study creates more avenues to further that conversation.
590 $a School code: 0065.
650 4 $a Arts Management. $3 3423886
650 4 $a Cultural Resources Management. $3 1672692
653 $a Distributive
653 $a Diversity
653 $a Equity
653 $a Funding
653 $a Inclusion
653 $a Philanthropy
690 $a 0424
690 $a 0436
710 2 $a Drexel University. $b Arts Administration (Westphal College of Media Arts and Design). $3 3352670
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 79-12.
790 $a 0065
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10822309