東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effects of Instructional Coachin...

Lohmiller, Denise Kay.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effects of Instructional Coaching on Coaches' Competency and Elementary Teachers' Writing Instruction.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Instructional Coaching on Coaches' Competency and Elementary Teachers' Writing Instruction./
作者:	Lohmiller, Denise Kay.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	187 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-03A.
標題:	Language arts. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10930116
ISBN:	9780438329119

The Effects of Instructional Coaching on Coaches' Competency and Elementary Teachers' Writing Instruction.
Lohmiller, Denise Kay.

The Effects of Instructional Coaching on Coaches' Competency and Elementary Teachers' Writing Instruction. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 187 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Texas A&M University - Commerce, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The primary purpose of this parallel mixed methods study was to discover the extent to which instructional coaches and third and fourth grade elementary teachers were impacted by participating in the instructional coaching model available on their campuses. A subsequent concern was to determine to what extent the writing practices of the teachers were impacted by participating in the coaching cycle and coaching model. Further information was sought to determine if after working in a school with an instructional coaching model, teacher self-efficacy in writing instruction improved. Purposive sampling method was used to select the sample. Specifically, 31 third and fourth grade classroom teachers and 5 instructional coaches participated in the current study over a 9-week period. Out of the 31 classroom teachers, 10 were randomly selected to participate in the instructional coaching cycle directly with the instructional coach. The 5 lowest performing schools out of 13 elementary schools were selected based upon data from the 2016 State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) fourth-grade writing test. Instructional coaches were interviewed, and the data were analyzed using the constant comparative (Glaser & Strauss, 2012) for the purpose of continuously developing a theme or pattern in the responses. Quantitative data included the K-6 Teacher Writing Survey (Simmerman et al., 2012) and the Writing Self-Efficacy Instrument (Surman & Schumacker, 2012). Means and standard deviations were computed using the teacher writing survey. To determine whether a teacher's self-efficacy improved over the course of the study, scores from the 10 teachers who worked directly with the instructional coach and the 21 teachers who did not were compared using a between and within repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) because there was a pretest and posttest score for each teacher and there were two independent groups. Instructional coaches and the teachers working in the coaching cycle used coaching observation protocols throughout the study to supplement the data that were derived from the interview questions and the writing survey. Findings indicated all 5 instructional coaches believed the coaching model made an impact on their competency in coaching writing instruction. The majority of teachers reported using and valuing writing instruction, such as daily writing, providing student choice, and using mentor texts. A statistically significant difference in improving writing teachers' self-efficacy was revealed after participating in the instructional coaching model available on their campuses. Recommendations and implications for practice are discussed later in this publication.

ISBN: 9780438329119Subjects--Topical Terms:

532624
Language arts.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Coaches

The Effects of Instructional Coaching on Coaches' Competency and Elementary Teachers' Writing Instruction.
LDR:04044nmm a2200409 4500 001 2272018
005 20201102111647.5
008 220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438329119
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10930116
035 $a (MiAaPQ)tamucommerce:10735
035 $a AAI10930116
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lohmiller, Denise Kay. $3 3549442
245 1 4 $a The Effects of Instructional Coaching on Coaches' Competency and Elementary Teachers' Writing Instruction.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 187 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Brown, David.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Texas A&M University - Commerce, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The primary purpose of this parallel mixed methods study was to discover the extent to which instructional coaches and third and fourth grade elementary teachers were impacted by participating in the instructional coaching model available on their campuses. A subsequent concern was to determine to what extent the writing practices of the teachers were impacted by participating in the coaching cycle and coaching model. Further information was sought to determine if after working in a school with an instructional coaching model, teacher self-efficacy in writing instruction improved. Purposive sampling method was used to select the sample. Specifically, 31 third and fourth grade classroom teachers and 5 instructional coaches participated in the current study over a 9-week period. Out of the 31 classroom teachers, 10 were randomly selected to participate in the instructional coaching cycle directly with the instructional coach. The 5 lowest performing schools out of 13 elementary schools were selected based upon data from the 2016 State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) fourth-grade writing test. Instructional coaches were interviewed, and the data were analyzed using the constant comparative (Glaser & Strauss, 2012) for the purpose of continuously developing a theme or pattern in the responses. Quantitative data included the K-6 Teacher Writing Survey (Simmerman et al., 2012) and the Writing Self-Efficacy Instrument (Surman & Schumacker, 2012). Means and standard deviations were computed using the teacher writing survey. To determine whether a teacher's self-efficacy improved over the course of the study, scores from the 10 teachers who worked directly with the instructional coach and the 21 teachers who did not were compared using a between and within repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) because there was a pretest and posttest score for each teacher and there were two independent groups. Instructional coaches and the teachers working in the coaching cycle used coaching observation protocols throughout the study to supplement the data that were derived from the interview questions and the writing survey. Findings indicated all 5 instructional coaches believed the coaching model made an impact on their competency in coaching writing instruction. The majority of teachers reported using and valuing writing instruction, such as daily writing, providing student choice, and using mentor texts. A statistically significant difference in improving writing teachers' self-efficacy was revealed after participating in the instructional coaching model available on their campuses. Recommendations and implications for practice are discussed later in this publication.
590 $a School code: 1287.
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 3172312
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
653 $a Coaches
653 $a Competency
653 $a Elementary teachers
653 $a Instructional coaching
653 $a Writing instruction
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a Texas A&M University - Commerce. $b Supervision, Curriculum, and Instruction-Elementary Education. $3 3193551
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-03A.
790 $a 1287
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10930116