東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Establishing the Correspondence Betw...

Alsharif, Shahad.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Establishing the Correspondence Between Listening to One's Own Voice and Doing in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Establishing the Correspondence Between Listening to One's Own Voice and Doing in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder./
作者:	Alsharif, Shahad.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	144 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-12B.
標題:	Special education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27996950
ISBN:	9798635280379

Establishing the Correspondence Between Listening to One's Own Voice and Doing in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Alsharif, Shahad.

Establishing the Correspondence Between Listening to One's Own Voice and Doing in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 144 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Before the acquisition of speaker-as-own-listener (SOL) where individuals demonstrate verbal governance of their own overt and covert behavior (Skinner, 1957), individuals have to have the correspondence between listening to one's own voice and doing, which I name self-listening. Self-listening is defined as the correspondence between listening to one's own voice and doing in two forms: listening to one's own voice and doing in isolation, and joining of print with listening to one's own voice after reading aloud and doing. I conducted two experiments to investigate the establishment of self-listening in children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder. I evaluated two different topographies of the target behavior: listen-to-own-voice-do (LOVD), which is defined as the correspondence between listening to one's own voice and doing in isolation, and read-aloud-do (RAD), which is defined as the correspondence between reading aloud and doing. As Skinner (1957) explained, reading is an extension of listening. When individuals are reading, they see print, say print, and then hear themselves. For that reason, listening to one's own voice was targeted as one dependent variable and reading aloud as a second to compare the participants' performance on both topographies accurately, as RAD includes both a listening and a reading component, while LOVD includes a listening component only. Using a multiple probe design across participants, I analyzed the participants' performance in the two different topographies, LOVD and RAD, across two different tasks: a drawing task and a building task. The participants had to follow written directions in RAD and spoken directions in LOVD to produce a drawing in the drawing task and a construction in the building task. The dependent variables were identical across Experiments I and II, but varied in terms of the measurement system for the building task. In Experiment I, the intervention was listener instruction and in Experiment II the intervention was listener and reader instruction, in which I utilized the learn unit (Albers & Greer, 1991) in presenting the instruction and consequating the participants' correct and incorrect responses. The intervention in both experiments was presented in the form of a treasure hunt where the participants had to complete a 20-step treasure hunt accurately to earn a desired reinforcer. The results of both experiments showed that the dependent variables, LOVD and RAD, were established across all participants. There were limitations in Experiment I, which were addressed in Experiment II.

ISBN: 9798635280379Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Listen-do correspondence

Establishing the Correspondence Between Listening to One's Own Voice and Doing in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
LDR:03863nmm a2200385 4500 001 2271555
005 20201019064013.5
008 220629s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798635280379
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27996950
035 $a AAI27996950
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Alsharif, Shahad. $3 3548964
245 1 0 $a Establishing the Correspondence Between Listening to One's Own Voice and Doing in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 144 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Greer, Douglas R.;Dudek, Jessica.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Before the acquisition of speaker-as-own-listener (SOL) where individuals demonstrate verbal governance of their own overt and covert behavior (Skinner, 1957), individuals have to have the correspondence between listening to one's own voice and doing, which I name self-listening. Self-listening is defined as the correspondence between listening to one's own voice and doing in two forms: listening to one's own voice and doing in isolation, and joining of print with listening to one's own voice after reading aloud and doing. I conducted two experiments to investigate the establishment of self-listening in children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder. I evaluated two different topographies of the target behavior: listen-to-own-voice-do (LOVD), which is defined as the correspondence between listening to one's own voice and doing in isolation, and read-aloud-do (RAD), which is defined as the correspondence between reading aloud and doing. As Skinner (1957) explained, reading is an extension of listening. When individuals are reading, they see print, say print, and then hear themselves. For that reason, listening to one's own voice was targeted as one dependent variable and reading aloud as a second to compare the participants' performance on both topographies accurately, as RAD includes both a listening and a reading component, while LOVD includes a listening component only. Using a multiple probe design across participants, I analyzed the participants' performance in the two different topographies, LOVD and RAD, across two different tasks: a drawing task and a building task. The participants had to follow written directions in RAD and spoken directions in LOVD to produce a drawing in the drawing task and a construction in the building task. The dependent variables were identical across Experiments I and II, but varied in terms of the measurement system for the building task. In Experiment I, the intervention was listener instruction and in Experiment II the intervention was listener and reader instruction, in which I utilized the learn unit (Albers & Greer, 1991) in presenting the instruction and consequating the participants' correct and incorrect responses. The intervention in both experiments was presented in the form of a treasure hunt where the participants had to complete a 20-step treasure hunt accurately to earn a desired reinforcer. The results of both experiments showed that the dependent variables, LOVD and RAD, were established across all participants. There were limitations in Experiment I, which were addressed in Experiment II.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
653 $a Listen-do correspondence
653 $a Read-do correspondence
653 $a Say-do correspondence
653 $a Self-listener
653 $a Self-listening
653 $a Speaker-as-own-listener
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b TC: Applied Behavioral Analysis. $3 2093053
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-12B.
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27996950