東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Politics of Rescuing Rubbish: A ...

Reynolds, Eva.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Politics of Rescuing Rubbish: A Social Movement Analysis of Two Food Waste Activist Groups in London.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Politics of Rescuing Rubbish: A Social Movement Analysis of Two Food Waste Activist Groups in London./
作者:	Reynolds, Eva.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	111 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-08.
標題:	Agriculture. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27912261
ISBN:	9781658424950

The Politics of Rescuing Rubbish: A Social Movement Analysis of Two Food Waste Activist Groups in London.
Reynolds, Eva.

The Politics of Rescuing Rubbish: A Social Movement Analysis of Two Food Waste Activist Groups in London. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 111 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08.

Thesis (M.A.)--American University of Rome, 2019.

Food waste's rise from unidentified problem to sustainability buzzword over the last decade has been well-documented, with growing public awareness that about a third of the world's onceedible food is discarded on an annual basis. While much credit is given to celebrities and activists such as Tristram Stuart for calling public attention to the issue, limited scholarship has closely examined the practices and strategies used by advocacy groups to challenge food waste and how they pertain to waste reduction policies. This dissertation set forth to determine how contemporary activists in London raise public awareness of food waste and work to influence change in the food system. Using Feedback and North London Food Not Bombs as case studies, the qualitative research was designed to examine a) the advocacy groups' practices and tactics to reduce food waste and motivate others to do the same; and b) how they engage with public sector policies to reduce food waste, and with what potential implications for food security. Data collected through participant observation, interviews, and media monitoring were then analyzed through theories of social emancipatory transformation, civil society organizations, new social movements, and alternative food movements. The study revealed that both cases include food waste as one component of a comprehensive critique of the status quo, with Feedback focusing on environmental sustainability and FNB emphasizing socioeconomic inequity and injustice. Moreover, Feedback was found to pursue a symbiotic strategy of change which includes consultation with policymakers, whereas FNB keeps to interstitial, direct action against waste and food poverty at the grassroots level. This dissertation aims to further discussions on civil society groups which focus on food both as an issue and as a tool for political engagement, emphasizing opportunities for public mobilization and for collaboration to influence policy. Avenues for further research are recommended in the closing remarks.

ISBN: 9781658424950Subjects--Topical Terms:

518588
Agriculture.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Food waste

The Politics of Rescuing Rubbish: A Social Movement Analysis of Two Food Waste Activist Groups in London.
LDR:03232nmm a2200409 4500 001 2269944
005 20200921070406.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781658424950
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27912261
035 $a AAI27912261
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Reynolds, Eva. $3 3547312
245 1 4 $a The Politics of Rescuing Rubbish: A Social Movement Analysis of Two Food Waste Activist Groups in London.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 111 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--American University of Rome, 2019.
520 $a Food waste's rise from unidentified problem to sustainability buzzword over the last decade has been well-documented, with growing public awareness that about a third of the world's onceedible food is discarded on an annual basis. While much credit is given to celebrities and activists such as Tristram Stuart for calling public attention to the issue, limited scholarship has closely examined the practices and strategies used by advocacy groups to challenge food waste and how they pertain to waste reduction policies. This dissertation set forth to determine how contemporary activists in London raise public awareness of food waste and work to influence change in the food system. Using Feedback and North London Food Not Bombs as case studies, the qualitative research was designed to examine a) the advocacy groups' practices and tactics to reduce food waste and motivate others to do the same; and b) how they engage with public sector policies to reduce food waste, and with what potential implications for food security. Data collected through participant observation, interviews, and media monitoring were then analyzed through theories of social emancipatory transformation, civil society organizations, new social movements, and alternative food movements. The study revealed that both cases include food waste as one component of a comprehensive critique of the status quo, with Feedback focusing on environmental sustainability and FNB emphasizing socioeconomic inequity and injustice. Moreover, Feedback was found to pursue a symbiotic strategy of change which includes consultation with policymakers, whereas FNB keeps to interstitial, direct action against waste and food poverty at the grassroots level. This dissertation aims to further discussions on civil society groups which focus on food both as an issue and as a tool for political engagement, emphasizing opportunities for public mobilization and for collaboration to influence policy. Avenues for further research are recommended in the closing remarks.
590 $a School code: 2062.
650 4 $a Agriculture. $3 518588
650 4 $a Food science. $3 3173303
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
653 $a Food waste
653 $a Social movement theory
653 $a Feedback global
653 $a Food not bombs
653 $a London
653 $a United Kingdom
653 $a New social movements
653 $a Civil society
653 $a Direct action
653 $a Social media
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0359
690 $a 0473
710 2 $a American University of Rome. $b Food Studies. $3 3547313
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-08.
790 $a 2062
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27912261