東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Traditional vs. Self-Compassionate E...

Kalianivala, Anahita Z.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Traditional vs. Self-Compassionate Expressive Writing: Differentiating Processes Through Linguistic Analysis.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Traditional vs. Self-Compassionate Expressive Writing: Differentiating Processes Through Linguistic Analysis./
Author:	Kalianivala, Anahita Z.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	119 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-09B.
Subject:	Clinical psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22619328
ISBN:	9781392646823

Traditional vs. Self-Compassionate Expressive Writing: Differentiating Processes Through Linguistic Analysis.
Kalianivala, Anahita Z.

Traditional vs. Self-Compassionate Expressive Writing: Differentiating Processes Through Linguistic Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 119 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Expressive writing (EW) is an experimental paradigm developed by Pennebaker and colleagues (Pennebaker & Beall, 1986). In traditional EW tasks, participants are asked to disclose their deepest thoughts and emotions concerning the most traumatic or stressful event of their lives. Consistent with the notion that EW may be beneficial for those with psychological diagnoses, research has looked to individual differences that infer risk or are associated with the maintenance of psychological disorders. It has been posited that an underlying mechanism of EW is the implicit message for participants to be accepting and non-judgmental towards their emotions and cognitions through the instruction to delve into one's deepest thoughts and feelings. Thus, EW may be a particularly useful intervention tool for individuals prone to rumination, a repetitive form of thinking about the self, especially one's sad or depressed feelings (Nolen- Hoeksema, Wisco, & Lyubomirsky, 2008). In particular, Baum and Rude (2013) proposed self-compassion as a related construct that may further enhance the benefit of EW. The current study sought to align multiple arms of EW research that have typically been separately pursued: comparing traditional EW to an adapted paradigm (e.g., providing instructions that guide participants to engage in principles of self-compassion,); measuring individual differences which may impact EW benefit; and conducting linguistic analysis to further understand psychological processes occurring during writing. Overall, participants reported both EW conditions as beneficial, on average. Negative affect increased across writing sessions for the full sample, consistent with typical immediate effects of EW. However, none of the hypothesized differences in affect or cognitive word use by EW condition were supported, nor were the moderation effects of rumination.

ISBN: 9781392646823Subjects--Topical Terms:

524863
Clinical psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Expressive writing

Traditional vs. Self-Compassionate Expressive Writing: Differentiating Processes Through Linguistic Analysis.
LDR:03124nmm a2200385 4500 001 2269525
005 20200911122836.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392646823
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22619328
035 $a AAI22619328
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kalianivala, Anahita Z. $3 3546862
245 1 0 $a Traditional vs. Self-Compassionate Expressive Writing: Differentiating Processes Through Linguistic Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 119 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Eddington, Kari M.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Expressive writing (EW) is an experimental paradigm developed by Pennebaker and colleagues (Pennebaker & Beall, 1986). In traditional EW tasks, participants are asked to disclose their deepest thoughts and emotions concerning the most traumatic or stressful event of their lives. Consistent with the notion that EW may be beneficial for those with psychological diagnoses, research has looked to individual differences that infer risk or are associated with the maintenance of psychological disorders. It has been posited that an underlying mechanism of EW is the implicit message for participants to be accepting and non-judgmental towards their emotions and cognitions through the instruction to delve into one's deepest thoughts and feelings. Thus, EW may be a particularly useful intervention tool for individuals prone to rumination, a repetitive form of thinking about the self, especially one's sad or depressed feelings (Nolen- Hoeksema, Wisco, & Lyubomirsky, 2008). In particular, Baum and Rude (2013) proposed self-compassion as a related construct that may further enhance the benefit of EW. The current study sought to align multiple arms of EW research that have typically been separately pursued: comparing traditional EW to an adapted paradigm (e.g., providing instructions that guide participants to engage in principles of self-compassion,); measuring individual differences which may impact EW benefit; and conducting linguistic analysis to further understand psychological processes occurring during writing. Overall, participants reported both EW conditions as beneficial, on average. Negative affect increased across writing sessions for the full sample, consistent with typical immediate effects of EW. However, none of the hypothesized differences in affect or cognitive word use by EW condition were supported, nor were the moderation effects of rumination.
590 $a School code: 0154.
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 2144789
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
653 $a Expressive writing
653 $a Linguistic inquiry and word count
653 $a LIWC
653 $a Rumination
653 $a Self-compassion
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. $b College of Arts & Sciences: Psychology. $3 1681739
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-09B.
790 $a 0154
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22619328