東華大學圖書館 |

Impressions of Telemedicine in Athletic Training Education.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Impressions of Telemedicine in Athletic Training Education./
作者:	Winkelmann, Zachary K.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	161 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12A.
標題:	Instructional Design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13814183
ISBN:	9781392235492

Impressions of Telemedicine in Athletic Training Education.
Winkelmann, Zachary K.

Impressions of Telemedicine in Athletic Training Education. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 161 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana State University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This study examined athletic training students' technology acceptance, knowledge, skill application, and perceptions regarding a distance-learning module and standardized patient (SP) encounter relative to telemedicine for athletic training clinical practice. Six athletic training programs delivered at the post-baccalaureate level voluntarily integrated the online module related to telemedicine in their curricula. Fifty-five second-year athletic training students participated in all parts of the study including four module quizzes, an individual SP encounter, and pre- and post-intervention surveys related to technology acceptance and transactional distance. I identified that participants had low acceptance for technology at the onset of the study that improved after the two-week intervention for the constructs of self-efficacy and perceived ease of use related to eLearning and the constructs of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitude related to telemedicine. On the SP encounter, 87.3% of participants correctly communicated the diagnosis of a lateral ankle sprain with another 3.6% correctly communicating the diagnosis but referred the patient to another provider to confirm the diagnosis. Participants scored poorly in the constructs of data gathering and telemedicine but scored well in the constructs of communication/interpersonal skills and patient education. Overall, the sum score of all constructs on the SP encounter resulted in an average score of 30.15 ± 5.79 out of 50 (range 15-42; percentage: 60.29% ± 11.59%, range 30.0%-84.0%). The specific tasks with 98% adherence or higher included the student was in a quiet room, asked only one question at a time, conducted a thorough medical history, and provided an appropriate immediate care plan. I identified a significant improvement in confidence for "using telemedicine technology" from pre (M = 2.60 ± 0.83) to post (M = 3.49 ± 0.92) intervention (t(54) = -6.412, p ≤ 0.001). Most participants reported engaging in the module, and the facilitator and resources provided were helpful. Participants felt the material in the online module was neither difficult nor easy (n = 35, 63.6%) with only four participants' stating the material was difficult (n = 4, 7.3%). Additional open-ended responses that were qualitatively coded identified two constructs focused on eLearning and telemedicine. Each construct had the same two domains: benefits and limitations. Under eLearning, the benefits domain included three categories, including previous experiences, learning on their own time, and productive. The limitations domains of eLearning included neutrality, workload, and missing interaction or content categories. The benefits of telemedicine included four categories with subtle but distinct differences, including access, technological convenience, consultation, and clinician assessment measures. Finally, two categories under limitations of telemedicine emerged from the data, including the inability to complete a musculoskeletal exam and other. Overall, the results of this study identified that technology acceptance and transactional distance are important components of online learning. The performance on the SP encounter highlighted that it is possible to teach the delivery of telemedicine patient care asynchronously with some students achieving and implementing all content related to this technology. Athletic training educators should be mindful to include debriefing sessions following SP encounters and to properly educate learners regarding the differences in online education requirements specific to workload and user interactions. The participants in this study expanded their views on telemedicine including benefits of its use yet were often held back by technology issues or lack of perceived transferability to their future clinical practice.

ISBN: 9781392235492Subjects--Topical Terms:

3432465
Instructional Design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

E-learning

Impressions of Telemedicine in Athletic Training Education.
LDR:05139nmm a2200421 4500 001 2268113
005 20200810100543.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392235492
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13814183
035 $a (MiAaPQ)indstate:10948
035 $a AAI13814183
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Winkelmann, Zachary K. $3 3545370
245 1 0 $a Impressions of Telemedicine in Athletic Training Education.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 161 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Powers, Susan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana State University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study examined athletic training students' technology acceptance, knowledge, skill application, and perceptions regarding a distance-learning module and standardized patient (SP) encounter relative to telemedicine for athletic training clinical practice. Six athletic training programs delivered at the post-baccalaureate level voluntarily integrated the online module related to telemedicine in their curricula. Fifty-five second-year athletic training students participated in all parts of the study including four module quizzes, an individual SP encounter, and pre- and post-intervention surveys related to technology acceptance and transactional distance. I identified that participants had low acceptance for technology at the onset of the study that improved after the two-week intervention for the constructs of self-efficacy and perceived ease of use related to eLearning and the constructs of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitude related to telemedicine. On the SP encounter, 87.3% of participants correctly communicated the diagnosis of a lateral ankle sprain with another 3.6% correctly communicating the diagnosis but referred the patient to another provider to confirm the diagnosis. Participants scored poorly in the constructs of data gathering and telemedicine but scored well in the constructs of communication/interpersonal skills and patient education. Overall, the sum score of all constructs on the SP encounter resulted in an average score of 30.15 ± 5.79 out of 50 (range 15-42; percentage: 60.29% ± 11.59%, range 30.0%-84.0%). The specific tasks with 98% adherence or higher included the student was in a quiet room, asked only one question at a time, conducted a thorough medical history, and provided an appropriate immediate care plan. I identified a significant improvement in confidence for "using telemedicine technology" from pre (M = 2.60 ± 0.83) to post (M = 3.49 ± 0.92) intervention (t(54) = -6.412, p ≤ 0.001). Most participants reported engaging in the module, and the facilitator and resources provided were helpful. Participants felt the material in the online module was neither difficult nor easy (n = 35, 63.6%) with only four participants' stating the material was difficult (n = 4, 7.3%). Additional open-ended responses that were qualitatively coded identified two constructs focused on eLearning and telemedicine. Each construct had the same two domains: benefits and limitations. Under eLearning, the benefits domain included three categories, including previous experiences, learning on their own time, and productive. The limitations domains of eLearning included neutrality, workload, and missing interaction or content categories. The benefits of telemedicine included four categories with subtle but distinct differences, including access, technological convenience, consultation, and clinician assessment measures. Finally, two categories under limitations of telemedicine emerged from the data, including the inability to complete a musculoskeletal exam and other. Overall, the results of this study identified that technology acceptance and transactional distance are important components of online learning. The performance on the SP encounter highlighted that it is possible to teach the delivery of telemedicine patient care asynchronously with some students achieving and implementing all content related to this technology. Athletic training educators should be mindful to include debriefing sessions following SP encounters and to properly educate learners regarding the differences in online education requirements specific to workload and user interactions. The participants in this study expanded their views on telemedicine including benefits of its use yet were often held back by technology issues or lack of perceived transferability to their future clinical practice.
590 $a School code: 0094.
650 4 $a Instructional Design. $3 3432465
650 4 $a Health education. $3 559086
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
653 $a E-learning
653 $a Ehealth
653 $a Simulation
653 $a Sports medicine
653 $a Standardized patients
653 $a Telehealth
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0680
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a Indiana State University. $b Curriculum, Instruction, and Media Technology. $3 1672167
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12A.
790 $a 0094
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13814183