東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Student-Generated Questions in Inqui...

Minshew, Lana M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Student-Generated Questions in Inquiry Science: Connecting to Collaborative Argumentation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Student-Generated Questions in Inquiry Science: Connecting to Collaborative Argumentation./
作者:	Minshew, Lana M.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	216 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12A.
標題:	Instructional Design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10937481
ISBN:	9781392199473

Student-Generated Questions in Inquiry Science: Connecting to Collaborative Argumentation.
Minshew, Lana M.

Student-Generated Questions in Inquiry Science: Connecting to Collaborative Argumentation. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 216 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.

Thesis (D.E.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The National Research Council (NRC) released the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States, 2013) that established a framework for three-dimensional learning, which includes science and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. The first dimension of learning emphasizes scientific and engineering practices asserting that students should not only be familiar with scientific practices but also be able to successfully conduct an investigation utilizing the practices (NGSS Lead States, 2013). The science practices were included in the NGSS because knowing science content is not enough; students need to be able to use their understanding to investigate the natural world (NGSS Lead States, 2013). The expectation is that students not just know science content but can participate in science exploration and the many discourses of science. The scientific practices intentionally overlap one another and are interconnected; they do not operate in isolation (NGSS Lead States, 2013). However, little is known about how the scientific practices overlap, specifically how one scientific practice influences another. Studies often focus on students' development or implementation of a single scientific practice such as developing and using models or engaging in argumentation. This dissertation study aimed to examine the relationship between questions posed and dialogical arguments constructed by students during collaborative work in small groups during a designed curricular unit titled Compost. The focus was on questions and dialogical arguments that arose naturally as students' participated in a collaborative project-based inquiry science curriculum. The data from this study showed that students' questions helped them to navigate the science content presented in the Compost curricular unit. Students' questions directed student thinking by enabling them to share their prior knowledge, identify points of uncertainty, challenge each others' ideas, as well as generate and occasionally sustain increasingly complex instances of argumentation.

ISBN: 9781392199473Subjects--Topical Terms:

3432465
Instructional Design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Argumentation

Student-Generated Questions in Inquiry Science: Connecting to Collaborative Argumentation.
LDR:03360nmm a2200385 4500 001 2268097
005 20200810100539.5
008 220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392199473
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10937481
035 $a (MiAaPQ)unc:18148
035 $a AAI10937481
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Minshew, Lana M. $3 3545353
245 1 0 $a Student-Generated Questions in Inquiry Science: Connecting to Collaborative Argumentation.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 216 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Anderson, Janice L.
502 $a Thesis (D.E.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The National Research Council (NRC) released the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States, 2013) that established a framework for three-dimensional learning, which includes science and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. The first dimension of learning emphasizes scientific and engineering practices asserting that students should not only be familiar with scientific practices but also be able to successfully conduct an investigation utilizing the practices (NGSS Lead States, 2013). The science practices were included in the NGSS because knowing science content is not enough; students need to be able to use their understanding to investigate the natural world (NGSS Lead States, 2013). The expectation is that students not just know science content but can participate in science exploration and the many discourses of science. The scientific practices intentionally overlap one another and are interconnected; they do not operate in isolation (NGSS Lead States, 2013). However, little is known about how the scientific practices overlap, specifically how one scientific practice influences another. Studies often focus on students' development or implementation of a single scientific practice such as developing and using models or engaging in argumentation. This dissertation study aimed to examine the relationship between questions posed and dialogical arguments constructed by students during collaborative work in small groups during a designed curricular unit titled Compost. The focus was on questions and dialogical arguments that arose naturally as students' participated in a collaborative project-based inquiry science curriculum. The data from this study showed that students' questions helped them to navigate the science content presented in the Compost curricular unit. Students' questions directed student thinking by enabling them to share their prior knowledge, identify points of uncertainty, challenge each others' ideas, as well as generate and occasionally sustain increasingly complex instances of argumentation.
590 $a School code: 0153.
650 4 $a Instructional Design. $3 3432465
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
653 $a Argumentation
653 $a Asking questions
653 $a Collaboration
653 $a Learning sciences
653 $a Science education
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0714
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b Education. $3 1266420
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12A.
790 $a 0153
791 $a D.E.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10937481