東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Uber Politics: The Sharing Economy M...

Rosebrook, Erika .

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Uber Politics: The Sharing Economy Meets American Federalism.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Uber Politics: The Sharing Economy Meets American Federalism./
作者:	Rosebrook, Erika .
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	164 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-07A.
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27668936
ISBN:	9781392749296

Uber Politics: The Sharing Economy Meets American Federalism.
Rosebrook, Erika .

Uber Politics: The Sharing Economy Meets American Federalism. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 164 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation analyzes the policy paths of short-term rentals and ride-sharing to understand how and when state governments intervene in local issues. I use an original dataset of all state sharing economy policy from 2009-2018 to detail how the sharing economy emerged into the American policy landscape and was processed by state and local governments and the ways American federalism shaped the outcomes. Expectations from existing research would predict that the processes of short-term rental and ride-sharing policy adoption are similar and driven by partisanship, however through quantitative analysis and detailed case studies I find that instead, the policies proceed differently based on the division of functional responsibilities between state and local governments. Forty-nine states, driven by an alliance between interest groups and the availability of model legislation, quickly adopted similar ride-sharing regulations grounded in insurance policy that also largely eliminated local policymaking authority. For short-term rentals, the twenty-two states that have adopted state-level policy have moved more deliberately, customized the policy to state needs, and left cities with the governing authority to respond to local concerns. The divergent outcomes illustrate how states and cities sort out who governs what by filtering competing arguments and policy preferences through their existing functional responsibilities. This functional fit directs policies toward more receptive venues: if ride-sharing policy is about insurance, states, which typically regulate insurance, are more likely to step in and restrict local policy involvement. Conversely, after states were assured of receiving tax revenue, they left the regulation of short-term rentals to cities, as is typical for other land use-related governance. Ultimately, this research adds to the understanding of how emerging issues enter the policy landscape and when states intrude in local concerns.

ISBN: 9781392749296Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Federalism

Uber Politics: The Sharing Economy Meets American Federalism.
LDR:03154nmm a2200385 4500 001 2268033
005 20200810100227.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392749296
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27668936
035 $a AAI27668936
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rosebrook, Erika . $3 3545290
245 1 0 $a Uber Politics: The Sharing Economy Meets American Federalism.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 164 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Sapotichne, Josh.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation analyzes the policy paths of short-term rentals and ride-sharing to understand how and when state governments intervene in local issues. I use an original dataset of all state sharing economy policy from 2009-2018 to detail how the sharing economy emerged into the American policy landscape and was processed by state and local governments and the ways American federalism shaped the outcomes. Expectations from existing research would predict that the processes of short-term rental and ride-sharing policy adoption are similar and driven by partisanship, however through quantitative analysis and detailed case studies I find that instead, the policies proceed differently based on the division of functional responsibilities between state and local governments. Forty-nine states, driven by an alliance between interest groups and the availability of model legislation, quickly adopted similar ride-sharing regulations grounded in insurance policy that also largely eliminated local policymaking authority. For short-term rentals, the twenty-two states that have adopted state-level policy have moved more deliberately, customized the policy to state needs, and left cities with the governing authority to respond to local concerns. The divergent outcomes illustrate how states and cities sort out who governs what by filtering competing arguments and policy preferences through their existing functional responsibilities. This functional fit directs policies toward more receptive venues: if ride-sharing policy is about insurance, states, which typically regulate insurance, are more likely to step in and restrict local policy involvement. Conversely, after states were assured of receiving tax revenue, they left the regulation of short-term rentals to cities, as is typical for other land use-related governance. Ultimately, this research adds to the understanding of how emerging issues enter the policy landscape and when states intrude in local concerns.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Economic theory. $3 1556984
653 $a Federalism
653 $a Public policy
653 $a Ride-sharing
653 $a Sharing economy
653 $a Short-term rentals
653 $a Urban politics
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0511
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Political Science - Doctor of Philosophy. $3 3175253
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-07A.
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27668936