東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Deaf Employees' Perspectives on Effe...

Harrelson, Paul B.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Deaf Employees' Perspectives on Effective American Sign Language-English Interpreting in the Workplace: An Investigation Using the Critical Incident Technique.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Deaf Employees' Perspectives on Effective American Sign Language-English Interpreting in the Workplace: An Investigation Using the Critical Incident Technique./
作者:	Harrelson, Paul B.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	484 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-08A.
標題:	Organizational behavior. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27794079
ISBN:	9781392567623

Deaf Employees' Perspectives on Effective American Sign Language-English Interpreting in the Workplace: An Investigation Using the Critical Incident Technique.
Harrelson, Paul B.

Deaf Employees' Perspectives on Effective American Sign Language-English Interpreting in the Workplace: An Investigation Using the Critical Incident Technique. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 484 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Gallaudet University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

With legislated rights for employment of Deaf people in the United States and the greater availability of professional American Sign Language-English interpreters, one might imagine that communication is no longer a barrier to workplace productivity, success, and job satisfaction; however, several studies suggest that conditions for Deaf employees remain less than ideal. In this study, I examine questions of what constitutes effective interpreter behaviors and systemic structures that underlie interpreter provision. Using the Critical Incident Technique documented by Flanagan (1954), I investigate the experience of 17 Deaf, white-collar employees, whose dominant language is American Sign Language, regarding their observations of interpreter-mediated communication in the workplace. Specifically, I explore how Deaf professionals characterize both effective and ineffective interpreting, as well as the provision of interpreting services. Drawing on 947 critical incidents, I created a taxonomy of 270 desired behaviors, 50 themes, and seven thematic clusters surrounding interpreter behaviors and systemic factors. Data analysis resulted in six findings, including (a) Deaf professionals have a rich understanding of effective interpreter behaviors and systems of interpreter provision, (b) Deaf professionals are burdened with "access work" in relation to interpreters, and (c) Deaf professionals are acutely aware that they are being represented through interpreters, among other ideas. I argue in two recommendations and associated caveats that the only way forward in applying these findings is for (a) interpreters to adopt a customer service frame and (b) institutions to recognize that Deaf professionals are the experts in access to workplace communication and their delineation of interpreting needs should be followed. The findings provide the first large-scale examination of Deaf employees' perceptions of interpreter-mediated communication in the workplace. By providing a detailed account about what constitutes effective services, the results hold implications for interpreters, interpreter educators, professional organizations, employers, interpreting agencies, and Deaf employees themselves. Ultimately, this study offers a starting point to determine whether Deaf professionals perceive interpreting services as fulfilling the legislated promise of communication access in the workplace.

ISBN: 9781392567623Subjects--Topical Terms:

516683
Organizational behavior.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Critical incident technique

Deaf Employees' Perspectives on Effective American Sign Language-English Interpreting in the Workplace: An Investigation Using the Critical Incident Technique.
LDR:03612nmm a2200349 4500 001 2267496
005 20200707094533.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392567623
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27794079
035 $a AAI27794079
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Harrelson, Paul B. $3 3544748
245 1 0 $a Deaf Employees' Perspectives on Effective American Sign Language-English Interpreting in the Workplace: An Investigation Using the Critical Incident Technique.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 484 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Brenda Nicodemus.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Gallaudet University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a With legislated rights for employment of Deaf people in the United States and the greater availability of professional American Sign Language-English interpreters, one might imagine that communication is no longer a barrier to workplace productivity, success, and job satisfaction; however, several studies suggest that conditions for Deaf employees remain less than ideal. In this study, I examine questions of what constitutes effective interpreter behaviors and systemic structures that underlie interpreter provision. Using the Critical Incident Technique documented by Flanagan (1954), I investigate the experience of 17 Deaf, white-collar employees, whose dominant language is American Sign Language, regarding their observations of interpreter-mediated communication in the workplace. Specifically, I explore how Deaf professionals characterize both effective and ineffective interpreting, as well as the provision of interpreting services. Drawing on 947 critical incidents, I created a taxonomy of 270 desired behaviors, 50 themes, and seven thematic clusters surrounding interpreter behaviors and systemic factors. Data analysis resulted in six findings, including (a) Deaf professionals have a rich understanding of effective interpreter behaviors and systems of interpreter provision, (b) Deaf professionals are burdened with "access work" in relation to interpreters, and (c) Deaf professionals are acutely aware that they are being represented through interpreters, among other ideas. I argue in two recommendations and associated caveats that the only way forward in applying these findings is for (a) interpreters to adopt a customer service frame and (b) institutions to recognize that Deaf professionals are the experts in access to workplace communication and their delineation of interpreting needs should be followed. The findings provide the first large-scale examination of Deaf employees' perceptions of interpreter-mediated communication in the workplace. By providing a detailed account about what constitutes effective services, the results hold implications for interpreters, interpreter educators, professional organizations, employers, interpreting agencies, and Deaf employees themselves. Ultimately, this study offers a starting point to determine whether Deaf professionals perceive interpreting services as fulfilling the legislated promise of communication access in the workplace.
590 $a School code: 0505.
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
650 4 $a Translation studies. $3 3310485
653 $a Critical incident technique
653 $a Interpreting
653 $a American sign language
653 $a Behavior
690 $a 0213
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Gallaudet University. $b Interpretation and Translation. $3 3544740
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-08A.
790 $a 0505
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27794079