東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Sabotaging our sisters: Perceptions ...

Nyborg, Deborah G.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Sabotaging our sisters: Perceptions of female relational aggression in higher education among female faculty and administrators at three western U.S. universities.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Sabotaging our sisters: Perceptions of female relational aggression in higher education among female faculty and administrators at three western U.S. universities./
作者:	Nyborg, Deborah G.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2012,
面頁冊數:	215 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 74-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International74-10A.
標題:	Social research. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3536199
ISBN:	9781267926456

Sabotaging our sisters: Perceptions of female relational aggression in higher education among female faculty and administrators at three western U.S. universities.
Nyborg, Deborah G.

Sabotaging our sisters: Perceptions of female relational aggression in higher education among female faculty and administrators at three western U.S. universities. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2012 - 215 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 74-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Idaho State University, 2012.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

The purpose of this study was to explore and understand relational workplace aggression among female faculty and administrators at three western U.S. universities. This study was designed to address the gap in empirical knowledge of the phenomenon by elucidating how workplace relational aggression affects the lives of female university faculty and administrators who are targets of workplace aggression by their female colleagues. This study employed mixed methods: quantitative data were derived from surveys sent to 210 female faculty and administrators at three universities; qualitative data were derived from face-to-face interviews conducted with 9 survey respondents. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to draw conclusions from the data derived from the survey. The quantitative research explored the perceived prevalence of workplace aggression, as defined and delimited by twenty-three workplace aggression survey items. Among the twenty-three survey items designed to query workplace aggression instances and associated prevalence, nearly a quarter of respondents noted they had been subject to someone rolling their eyes when the respondents were talking, receiving unkind looks, and being given the silent treatment. Another quantitative question explored perceptions of the effect of relational aggression on job satisfaction. Although the means indicated that the majority of participants disagreed to some extent with the majority of the survey items associated with reduced job satisfaction, the highest ranked items conveyed psychological and emotional impacts that reflected reduced job satisfaction including sleepless nights and crying. The inductive analysis of the interview data yielded five broad themes. They were: (a) anytime, anywhere; (b) motives; (c) trigger events; (d) target resilience; and (e) not everybody. None of the interviewees indicated a motive associated with race, sexual orientation or gender, but several referenced power, feelings of importance and self-esteem as factors in the aggression they experienced or witnessed. Interviewees most often cited the motivation for relational aggression to be jealousy, although their circumstances varied. Although the quantitative data in terms of overall prevalence of experiences associated with workplace aggression instances were low, the qualitative data indicated that workplace aggression was an issue, with eight of the nine respondents indicating that they had been witnesses to such acts, and seven of the nine indicating that they had at some point been targets of aggression.

ISBN: 9781267926456Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122687
Social research.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Relational aggression

Sabotaging our sisters: Perceptions of female relational aggression in higher education among female faculty and administrators at three western U.S. universities.
LDR:03927nmm a2200373 4500 001 2267320
005 20200623064729.5
008 220629s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267926456
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3536199
035 $a AAI3536199
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Nyborg, Deborah G. $3 3544561
245 1 0 $a Sabotaging our sisters: Perceptions of female relational aggression in higher education among female faculty and administrators at three western U.S. universities.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2012
300 $a 215 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 74-10, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Pemberton, Cynthia.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Idaho State University, 2012.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to explore and understand relational workplace aggression among female faculty and administrators at three western U.S. universities. This study was designed to address the gap in empirical knowledge of the phenomenon by elucidating how workplace relational aggression affects the lives of female university faculty and administrators who are targets of workplace aggression by their female colleagues. This study employed mixed methods: quantitative data were derived from surveys sent to 210 female faculty and administrators at three universities; qualitative data were derived from face-to-face interviews conducted with 9 survey respondents. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to draw conclusions from the data derived from the survey. The quantitative research explored the perceived prevalence of workplace aggression, as defined and delimited by twenty-three workplace aggression survey items. Among the twenty-three survey items designed to query workplace aggression instances and associated prevalence, nearly a quarter of respondents noted they had been subject to someone rolling their eyes when the respondents were talking, receiving unkind looks, and being given the silent treatment. Another quantitative question explored perceptions of the effect of relational aggression on job satisfaction. Although the means indicated that the majority of participants disagreed to some extent with the majority of the survey items associated with reduced job satisfaction, the highest ranked items conveyed psychological and emotional impacts that reflected reduced job satisfaction including sleepless nights and crying. The inductive analysis of the interview data yielded five broad themes. They were: (a) anytime, anywhere; (b) motives; (c) trigger events; (d) target resilience; and (e) not everybody. None of the interviewees indicated a motive associated with race, sexual orientation or gender, but several referenced power, feelings of importance and self-esteem as factors in the aggression they experienced or witnessed. Interviewees most often cited the motivation for relational aggression to be jealousy, although their circumstances varied. Although the quantitative data in terms of overall prevalence of experiences associated with workplace aggression instances were low, the qualitative data indicated that workplace aggression was an issue, with eight of the nine respondents indicating that they had been witnesses to such acts, and seven of the nine indicating that they had at some point been targets of aggression.
590 $a School code: 0320.
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
650 4 $a Higher Education Administration. $3 3432472
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
653 $a Relational aggression
653 $a Women faculty
653 $a Workplace aggression
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Idaho State University. $b Educational Leadership. $3 3544562
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 74-10A.
790 $a 0320
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3536199