東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Creation, Validation, and Implem...

Butler, Brittany L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Creation, Validation, and Implementation of the Engineering Process Safety Research Instrument.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Creation, Validation, and Implementation of the Engineering Process Safety Research Instrument./
作者:	Butler, Brittany L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	170 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International80-07.
標題:	Occupational safety. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13423049
ISBN:	9780438761957

The Creation, Validation, and Implementation of the Engineering Process Safety Research Instrument.
Butler, Brittany L.

The Creation, Validation, and Implementation of the Engineering Process Safety Research Instrument. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 170 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07.

Thesis (M.S.)--Rowan University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an instrument that can measure how senior chemical engineering students make process safety decisions. The Engineering Process Safety Research Instrument (EPSRI) contains dilemmas that represent process safety scenarios, followed by three decision options, and 12-15 considerations that fall into pre-conventional, conventional, or post-conventional forms of reasoning. Three studies were completed as a part of this research. The content validation study ensured the dilemmas represented process safety scenarios, the considerations matched their perceived theoretical definitions, and that no content areas were omitted. This study resulted in validation of the content, following the elimination of one dilemma and eleven considerations. The large scale validation study determined the number of underlying latent variables present on the instrument including the correlation between considerations on a factor. The instrument was not able to be fully validated, but resulted in the elimination of one dilemma and six considerations with 22 considerations being revised for further study. The think aloud protocol with the EPSRI determined how students were classified based on their EPSRI scores, and their moral reasoning approaching these dilemmas. From this study, it was found that senior chemical engineering students mainly applied post-conventional reasoning, despite all the students not being classified as post-conventional based on their EPSRI responses.

ISBN: 9780438761957Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172193
Occupational safety.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Engineering education

The Creation, Validation, and Implementation of the Engineering Process Safety Research Instrument.
LDR:02702nmm a2200373 4500 001 2267067
005 20200623111651.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438761957
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13423049
035 $a (MiAaPQ)rowan:10598
035 $a AAI13423049
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Butler, Brittany L. $3 3544308
245 1 4 $a The Creation, Validation, and Implementation of the Engineering Process Safety Research Instrument.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 170 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Bodnar, Cheryl A.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Rowan University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an instrument that can measure how senior chemical engineering students make process safety decisions. The Engineering Process Safety Research Instrument (EPSRI) contains dilemmas that represent process safety scenarios, followed by three decision options, and 12-15 considerations that fall into pre-conventional, conventional, or post-conventional forms of reasoning. Three studies were completed as a part of this research. The content validation study ensured the dilemmas represented process safety scenarios, the considerations matched their perceived theoretical definitions, and that no content areas were omitted. This study resulted in validation of the content, following the elimination of one dilemma and eleven considerations. The large scale validation study determined the number of underlying latent variables present on the instrument including the correlation between considerations on a factor. The instrument was not able to be fully validated, but resulted in the elimination of one dilemma and six considerations with 22 considerations being revised for further study. The think aloud protocol with the EPSRI determined how students were classified based on their EPSRI scores, and their moral reasoning approaching these dilemmas. From this study, it was found that senior chemical engineering students mainly applied post-conventional reasoning, despite all the students not being classified as post-conventional based on their EPSRI responses.
590 $a School code: 1419.
650 4 $a Occupational safety. $3 3172193
650 4 $a Engineering. $3 586835
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
653 $a Engineering education
653 $a Moral reasoning
653 $a Undergraduate
690 $a 0354
690 $a 0537
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a Rowan University. $b Engineering. $3 3351880
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 80-07.
790 $a 1419
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13423049