東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Understanding Hazing Perceptions of ...

Feuer, Emily.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Understanding Hazing Perceptions of Students and Administrators Using a Four Frame Approach.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Understanding Hazing Perceptions of Students and Administrators Using a Four Frame Approach./
作者:	Feuer, Emily.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	191 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-10A.
標題:	Educational sociology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13859143
ISBN:	9781392060858

Understanding Hazing Perceptions of Students and Administrators Using a Four Frame Approach.
Feuer, Emily.

Understanding Hazing Perceptions of Students and Administrators Using a Four Frame Approach. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 191 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Albany, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Hazing poses a health and safety risk to many students and campuses in the United States, including students involved in fraternities/sororities. To combat hazing, college campuses have put structures and policies in place in an attempt to better govern, control, or reduce fraternity/sorority activities, but hazing incidents continue to persist. This study examines how students affiliated with fraternities/sororities and administrators who work with these students frame hazing behavior with the intention of creating a foundation for interventions based on common findings and potential gaps in frame utilization. Bolman and Deal (2003) theorize that individuals utilize one or more of the following four frames to make sense of situations and problems within their organization: the Human Resource Frame, the Political Frame, the Structural Frame, and the Symbolic Frame. Bolman and Deal (2003) posit that the more frames individuals utilize, the better they will be able to understand and successfully overcome the situations they are dealing with. Using a qualitative approach, the researcher utilizes Bolman and Deal's (2003) Four Frames to analyze 17 interviews focused on hazing with students and administrators at two institutions located in the same state. This study finds that participants tend to utilize all of Bolman and Deal's (2003) Four Frames when discussing hazing, but the most frequently referenced frames are the Human Resource Frame and the Symbolic Frame. The least frequently referenced frame is the Structural Frame. In addition, this study finds subtle differences in frame utilization, especially related to terminology based on participant type (student versus administrator) and for institutions with differences between participants at Institution 1 and Institution 2. At Institution One, participants are more likely to focus on larger-scale goals and processes while participants at Institution Two are more likely to focus on specific policies and skills related to organizational history and information in addition to slight differences in terminology at each institution.

ISBN: 9781392060858Subjects--Topical Terms:

519608
Educational sociology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Four Frames

Understanding Hazing Perceptions of Students and Administrators Using a Four Frame Approach.
LDR:03345nmm a2200385 4500 001 2266891
005 20200623063157.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392060858
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13859143
035 $a (MiAaPQ)sunyalb:12558
035 $a AAI13859143
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Feuer, Emily. $3 3544118
245 1 0 $a Understanding Hazing Perceptions of Students and Administrators Using a Four Frame Approach.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 191 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Valverde, Gilbert.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Albany, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Hazing poses a health and safety risk to many students and campuses in the United States, including students involved in fraternities/sororities. To combat hazing, college campuses have put structures and policies in place in an attempt to better govern, control, or reduce fraternity/sorority activities, but hazing incidents continue to persist. This study examines how students affiliated with fraternities/sororities and administrators who work with these students frame hazing behavior with the intention of creating a foundation for interventions based on common findings and potential gaps in frame utilization. Bolman and Deal (2003) theorize that individuals utilize one or more of the following four frames to make sense of situations and problems within their organization: the Human Resource Frame, the Political Frame, the Structural Frame, and the Symbolic Frame. Bolman and Deal (2003) posit that the more frames individuals utilize, the better they will be able to understand and successfully overcome the situations they are dealing with. Using a qualitative approach, the researcher utilizes Bolman and Deal's (2003) Four Frames to analyze 17 interviews focused on hazing with students and administrators at two institutions located in the same state. This study finds that participants tend to utilize all of Bolman and Deal's (2003) Four Frames when discussing hazing, but the most frequently referenced frames are the Human Resource Frame and the Symbolic Frame. The least frequently referenced frame is the Structural Frame. In addition, this study finds subtle differences in frame utilization, especially related to terminology based on participant type (student versus administrator) and for institutions with differences between participants at Institution 1 and Institution 2. At Institution One, participants are more likely to focus on larger-scale goals and processes while participants at Institution Two are more likely to focus on specific policies and skills related to organizational history and information in addition to slight differences in terminology at each institution.
590 $a School code: 0668.
650 4 $a Educational sociology. $3 519608
650 4 $a Higher Education Administration. $3 3432472
650 4 $a Education Policy. $3 2186666
653 $a Four Frames
653 $a Fraternity
653 $a Hazing
653 $a Sorority
690 $a 0340
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a State University of New York at Albany. $b Educational Policy and Leadership. $3 3342757
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-10A.
790 $a 0668
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13859143