東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Delphi study on analysis structure...

Hadley, James A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Delphi study on analysis structures for PC-based training simulations.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Delphi study on analysis structures for PC-based training simulations./
作者:	Hadley, James A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
面頁冊數:	189 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International76-12A.
標題:	Instructional Design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3702751
ISBN:	9781321742206

A Delphi study on analysis structures for PC-based training simulations.
Hadley, James A.

A Delphi study on analysis structures for PC-based training simulations. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 189 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

When designing a training simulation delivered via a personal computer (PC), instructional designers face the difficult task of how to organize their content in the analysis and design phases. In addition to task analysis, instructional designers face the added requirement of modeling their content to support two goals: developing a structure that can be computed and creating a representation of the mental model the designer is trying to help the learner develop. Instructional Systems Design (ISD) does not address the question of which modeling approaches are most appropriate for different types of content when designing a PC-based training simulation. This study applied the Delphi technique by assessing the input of six experts in training simulation design. Using four rounds of inquiry, the study participants identified 11 content areas and 21 modeling approaches that are appropriate for PC-based training simulations. Next, they identified which approaches were appropriate or partially appropriate for each of the content types. The intent of the study was to organize these relationships into a matrix which instructional designers may use as they select modeling approaches during the analysis and design phases of a training simulation project. The findings indicate which modeling approaches are appropriate; however, they do not necessarily identify those approaches which are most appropriate. The findings do provide a starting point, though, for further research into the characteristics of the modeling approaches or the context of the content that would make one method more appropriate than another.

ISBN: 9781321742206Subjects--Topical Terms:

3432465
Instructional Design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Analysis

A Delphi study on analysis structures for PC-based training simulations.
LDR:02823nmm a2200385 4500 001 2266487
005 20200612094500.5
008 220629s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321742206
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3702751
035 $a (MiAaPQ)capella:17104
035 $a AAI3702751
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hadley, James A. $3 3543686
245 1 0 $a A Delphi study on analysis structures for PC-based training simulations.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 189 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 76-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: McDermott, James.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a When designing a training simulation delivered via a personal computer (PC), instructional designers face the difficult task of how to organize their content in the analysis and design phases. In addition to task analysis, instructional designers face the added requirement of modeling their content to support two goals: developing a structure that can be computed and creating a representation of the mental model the designer is trying to help the learner develop. Instructional Systems Design (ISD) does not address the question of which modeling approaches are most appropriate for different types of content when designing a PC-based training simulation. This study applied the Delphi technique by assessing the input of six experts in training simulation design. Using four rounds of inquiry, the study participants identified 11 content areas and 21 modeling approaches that are appropriate for PC-based training simulations. Next, they identified which approaches were appropriate or partially appropriate for each of the content types. The intent of the study was to organize these relationships into a matrix which instructional designers may use as they select modeling approaches during the analysis and design phases of a training simulation project. The findings indicate which modeling approaches are appropriate; however, they do not necessarily identify those approaches which are most appropriate. The findings do provide a starting point, though, for further research into the characteristics of the modeling approaches or the context of the content that would make one method more appropriate than another.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Instructional Design. $3 3432465
653 $a Analysis
653 $a Delphi
653 $a ISD
653 $a Instructional design
653 $a Simulation
653 $a Training
690 $a 0447
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Education. $3 1018430
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 76-12A.
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3702751