東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The religious innatism debate in ear...

Mills, R. J. W.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The religious innatism debate in early modern Britain = intellectual change beyond Locke /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The religious innatism debate in early modern Britain/ by R. J. W. Mills.
其他題名:	intellectual change beyond Locke /
作者:	Mills, R. J. W.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2021.,
面頁冊數:	ix, 132 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	1. Introduction -- 2. Religious Innatism as Mid-Seventeenth-Century Commonplace -- 3. Anti-Innatism c.1650-1690 -- 4. Locke Against Innatism -- 5. Locke and the Innatism Debate -- 6. Declining Discussion of Religious Innatism c.1710-c.1750? -- 7. Conclusion.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Natural theology - History of doctrines - 17th century. -
標題:	Great Britain - Religion - 17th century. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84323-6
ISBN:	9783030843236

The religious innatism debate in early modern Britain = intellectual change beyond Locke /
Mills, R. J. W.

The religious innatism debate in early modern Britainintellectual change beyond Locke /[electronic resource] :by R. J. W. Mills. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2021. - ix, 132 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Introduction -- 2. Religious Innatism as Mid-Seventeenth-Century Commonplace -- 3. Anti-Innatism c.1650-1690 -- 4. Locke Against Innatism -- 5. Locke and the Innatism Debate -- 6. Declining Discussion of Religious Innatism c.1710-c.1750? -- 7. Conclusion.

"A superb study of ideas about the psychological grounds of religious belief and its atheistic shadow in early modern Britain." -Angus Gowland, University College London, UK "With this impressively erudite and lucid book, Mills recovers a vitally important tradition in European thought that has hitherto been neglected. By debunking the shibboleth that the doctrine of innate religious ideas was consigned to oblivion by Locke, he places Enlightenment intellectual culture in a whole new light." -Niall O'Flaherty, King's College London, UK "Why do humans believe in God? Are religious beliefs natural to humanity and held in all societies? It used to be argued that John Locke's philosophy radically changed how intellectuals answered these questions. In this learned and lucid book, however, Mills shows that Locke's contribution has been misunderstood, and guides us through a lively debate - in which Locke was one participant among many." -Alasdair Raffe, University of Edinburgh, UK This book demonstrates that the common belief that humanity is naturally disposed to religion did not disappear with the emergence of the Enlightenment. Going beyond a narrow focus on John Locke's empiricism, this vivid analysis reconstructs the vociferous, multivocal debate over the natural origins of religious belief in England and Scotland between c. 1650 and c. 1750. It enriches our understanding through examining hundreds of discussions of the relationship between human nature and religion, from a variety of genres and contexts. It shows that belief in religious innatism was a ubiquitous and enduring claim about human nature across the continuum of Christian thought in early modern Britain, and one deployed for a variety of reasons. While the doctrine of innate religious ideas did fall out of use, the belief that human nature was framed for religion continued in new forms into the eighteenth century. R. J. W. Mills is an independent scholar based in London, UK. He was a Leverhulme Early Career Fellow at Queen Mary University of London and previously held Teaching Fellowships at King's College London and University College London.

ISBN: 9783030843236

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-84323-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3518304
Natural theology
--History of doctrines--17th century.Subjects--Geographical Terms:

3518302
Great Britain
--Religion--17th century.

LC Class. No.: BL183 / .M55 2021

Dewey Class. No.: 210.94109032

The religious innatism debate in early modern Britain = intellectual change beyond Locke /
LDR:03426nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2251378
003 DE-He213
005 20210920103659.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 220215s2021 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030843236 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030843229 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-84323-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-84323-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BL183 $b .M55 2021
072 7 $a HB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a HIS000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a NH $2 thema
072 7 $a NHAH $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 210.94109032 $2 23
090 $a BL183 $b .M657 2021
100 1 $a Mills, R. J. W. $3 3518301
245 1 4 $a The religious innatism debate in early modern Britain $h [electronic resource] : $b intellectual change beyond Locke / $c by R. J. W. Mills.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2021.
300 $a ix, 132 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. Religious Innatism as Mid-Seventeenth-Century Commonplace -- 3. Anti-Innatism c.1650-1690 -- 4. Locke Against Innatism -- 5. Locke and the Innatism Debate -- 6. Declining Discussion of Religious Innatism c.1710-c.1750? -- 7. Conclusion.
520 $a "A superb study of ideas about the psychological grounds of religious belief and its atheistic shadow in early modern Britain." -Angus Gowland, University College London, UK "With this impressively erudite and lucid book, Mills recovers a vitally important tradition in European thought that has hitherto been neglected. By debunking the shibboleth that the doctrine of innate religious ideas was consigned to oblivion by Locke, he places Enlightenment intellectual culture in a whole new light." -Niall O'Flaherty, King's College London, UK "Why do humans believe in God? Are religious beliefs natural to humanity and held in all societies? It used to be argued that John Locke's philosophy radically changed how intellectuals answered these questions. In this learned and lucid book, however, Mills shows that Locke's contribution has been misunderstood, and guides us through a lively debate - in which Locke was one participant among many." -Alasdair Raffe, University of Edinburgh, UK This book demonstrates that the common belief that humanity is naturally disposed to religion did not disappear with the emergence of the Enlightenment. Going beyond a narrow focus on John Locke's empiricism, this vivid analysis reconstructs the vociferous, multivocal debate over the natural origins of religious belief in England and Scotland between c. 1650 and c. 1750. It enriches our understanding through examining hundreds of discussions of the relationship between human nature and religion, from a variety of genres and contexts. It shows that belief in religious innatism was a ubiquitous and enduring claim about human nature across the continuum of Christian thought in early modern Britain, and one deployed for a variety of reasons. While the doctrine of innate religious ideas did fall out of use, the belief that human nature was framed for religion continued in new forms into the eighteenth century. R. J. W. Mills is an independent scholar based in London, UK. He was a Leverhulme Early Career Fellow at Queen Mary University of London and previously held Teaching Fellowships at King's College London and University College London.
650 0 $a Natural theology $x History of doctrines $y 17th century. $3 3518304
650 0 $a Natural theology $x History of doctrines $y 18th century. $3 3518305
650 0 $a Innate ideas (Philosophy) $x History $y 17th century. $3 3518306
650 0 $a Innate ideas (Philosophy) $x History $y 18th century. $3 3518307
650 1 4 $a History, general. $3 2162693
650 2 4 $a History of Britain and Ireland. $3 2181940
650 2 4 $a History of Early Modern Europe. $3 2182432
650 2 4 $a History of Philosophy. $3 896985
650 2 4 $a History of Religion. $3 3134882
651 0 $a Great Britain $x Religion $y 17th century. $3 3518302
651 0 $a Great Britain $x Religion $y 18th century. $3 3518303
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84323-6
950 $a History (SpringerNature-41172)