東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Permanent investment courts = the Eu...

Unuvar, Gunes.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Permanent investment courts = the European experiment /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Permanent investment courts/ edited by Gunes Unuvar, Joanna Lam, Shai Dothan.
Reminder of title:	the European experiment /
other author:	Unuvar, Gunes.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2020.,
Description:	ix, 150 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Shai Dothan and Joanna Lam, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanisms in Investors' Disputes -- Eleftheria Neframi, Permanent Investment Courts from the Perspective of the EU Legal Order -- Armand de Mestral and Lukas Vanhonnaeker, The North American Experience with Investor-State Arbitration: Does it lead to a Permanent Investment Court? -- Marc Bungenberg and Anna M. Holzer, Potential Enforcement Mechanisms for Decisions of a Multilateral Investment Court -- Gunes Unuvar and Tim Kreft, Impossible Ethics? An Analysis of the Rules on Ethics and Qualifications of Investment Court Judges.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Investments - Law and legislation - Europe. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9
ISBN:	9783030456849

Permanent investment courts = the European experiment /
Permanent investment courtsthe European experiment /[electronic resource] :edited by Gunes Unuvar, Joanna Lam, Shai Dothan. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - ix, 150 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - European yearbook of international economic law, Special issue. - European yearbook of international economic law.Special issue..

Shai Dothan and Joanna Lam, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanisms in Investors' Disputes -- Eleftheria Neframi, Permanent Investment Courts from the Perspective of the EU Legal Order -- Armand de Mestral and Lukas Vanhonnaeker, The North American Experience with Investor-State Arbitration: Does it lead to a Permanent Investment Court? -- Marc Bungenberg and Anna M. Holzer, Potential Enforcement Mechanisms for Decisions of a Multilateral Investment Court -- Gunes Unuvar and Tim Kreft, Impossible Ethics? An Analysis of the Rules on Ethics and Qualifications of Investment Court Judges.

This special issue focuses on the opportunities and challenges connected with investment courts. The creation of permanent investment courts was first proposed several decades ago, but it has only recently become likely that these proposals will be implemented. In particular, the European Commission has pushed for a court-like mechanism to resolve investment disputes in various recent trade and investment negotiations. Such a framework was included in some free trade agreements (FTAs) and investment protection agreements (IPAs) the European Union (EU) signed or negotiated with Vietnam, Singapore, Mexico and Canada. While it was shelved long before the publication of this Special Issue, the European Commission had also formally proposed a court system during the negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement with the United States. The issue of a Multilateral Investment Court (MIC) has also been prevalent at the Working Group III proceedings of the UNCITRAL on investor-State dispute settlement reform, attracting scholarly and public attention. Will these developments lead to the creation of permanent investment courts? How will such courts change the future of international investment law? Will they bring about a real institutional change in adjudicatory mechanisms? Will they introduce a 'hybrid' system, which borrows important characteristics from both arbitration and institutional methods of international adjudication? How will the enforcement mechanisms work, and under which rules of ethics will its adjudicators function and exercise their duties? This special issue brings together leading scholars sharing a common interest in investment courts to address these questions.

ISBN: 9783030456849

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

943646
Investments
--Law and legislation--Europe.

LC Class. No.: KJC2250 / .P47 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 346.40922

Permanent investment courts = the European experiment /
LDR:03436nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2243803
003 DE-He213
005 20210107152027.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 211207s2020 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030456849 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030456832 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-45684-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KJC2250 $b .P47 2020
072 7 $a LBBM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LBBM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 346.40922 $2 23
090 $a KJC2250 $b .P451 2020
245 0 0 $a Permanent investment courts $h [electronic resource] : $b the European experiment / $c edited by Gunes Unuvar, Joanna Lam, Shai Dothan.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a ix, 150 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a European yearbook of international economic law, Special issue
505 0 $a Shai Dothan and Joanna Lam, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanisms in Investors' Disputes -- Eleftheria Neframi, Permanent Investment Courts from the Perspective of the EU Legal Order -- Armand de Mestral and Lukas Vanhonnaeker, The North American Experience with Investor-State Arbitration: Does it lead to a Permanent Investment Court? -- Marc Bungenberg and Anna M. Holzer, Potential Enforcement Mechanisms for Decisions of a Multilateral Investment Court -- Gunes Unuvar and Tim Kreft, Impossible Ethics? An Analysis of the Rules on Ethics and Qualifications of Investment Court Judges.
520 $a This special issue focuses on the opportunities and challenges connected with investment courts. The creation of permanent investment courts was first proposed several decades ago, but it has only recently become likely that these proposals will be implemented. In particular, the European Commission has pushed for a court-like mechanism to resolve investment disputes in various recent trade and investment negotiations. Such a framework was included in some free trade agreements (FTAs) and investment protection agreements (IPAs) the European Union (EU) signed or negotiated with Vietnam, Singapore, Mexico and Canada. While it was shelved long before the publication of this Special Issue, the European Commission had also formally proposed a court system during the negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement with the United States. The issue of a Multilateral Investment Court (MIC) has also been prevalent at the Working Group III proceedings of the UNCITRAL on investor-State dispute settlement reform, attracting scholarly and public attention. Will these developments lead to the creation of permanent investment courts? How will such courts change the future of international investment law? Will they bring about a real institutional change in adjudicatory mechanisms? Will they introduce a 'hybrid' system, which borrows important characteristics from both arbitration and institutional methods of international adjudication? How will the enforcement mechanisms work, and under which rules of ethics will its adjudicators function and exercise their duties? This special issue brings together leading scholars sharing a common interest in investment courts to address these questions.
650 0 $a Investments $x Law and legislation $z Europe. $3 943646
650 1 4 $a International Economic Law, Trade Law. $3 1566625
650 2 4 $a European Economic Law. $3 3412422
650 2 4 $a European Union Politics. $3 2182000
700 1 $a Unuvar, Gunes. $3 3504186
700 1 $a Lam, Joanna. $3 3504187
700 1 $a Dothan, Shai. $3 3504188
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a European yearbook of international economic law. $p Special issue. $3 3489991
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)