東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Discussing cognitive neuroscience = ...

Benetka, Gerhard.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Discussing cognitive neuroscience = psychology, neurophysiology, and philosophy on the mind, body and brain /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Discussing cognitive neuroscience/ by Gerhard Benetka, Hans Werbik.
其他題名:	psychology, neurophysiology, and philosophy on the mind, body and brain /
作者:	Benetka, Gerhard.
其他作者:	Werbik, Hans.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2021.,
面頁冊數:	ix, 171 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Chapter 1. Critique of neuropsychology - A polemic -- Chapter 2. Living body (Leib) or physical dataset? Antonio Damsio's and Thomas Fuchs's holistic conception of the human being as opposite standpoint to reductionist models -- Chapter 3. The person and the brain -- Chapter 4. The neuropsychological discourse in philosophical critique - Bennett/Hacker and the consequences -- Chapter 5. Persistent biologism and the misuse of neuropsychology - an activity-theoretical contribution -- Chapter 6. Measuring free will with the readiness potential? New data on an old misunderstanding -- Chapter 7. The brain as protagonist - Without the brain all is nothing -- Chapter 8. Is it possible to simulate "thought"?
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Cognitive neuroscience. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8
ISBN:	9783030710408

Discussing cognitive neuroscience = psychology, neurophysiology, and philosophy on the mind, body and brain /
Benetka, Gerhard.

Discussing cognitive neurosciencepsychology, neurophysiology, and philosophy on the mind, body and brain /[electronic resource] :by Gerhard Benetka, Hans Werbik. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2021. - ix, 171 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Annals of theoretical psychology ;v.17. - Annals of theoretical psychology ;v.17..

Chapter 1. Critique of neuropsychology - A polemic -- Chapter 2. Living body (Leib) or physical dataset? Antonio Damsio's and Thomas Fuchs's holistic conception of the human being as opposite standpoint to reductionist models -- Chapter 3. The person and the brain -- Chapter 4. The neuropsychological discourse in philosophical critique - Bennett/Hacker and the consequences -- Chapter 5. Persistent biologism and the misuse of neuropsychology - an activity-theoretical contribution -- Chapter 6. Measuring free will with the readiness potential? New data on an old misunderstanding -- Chapter 7. The brain as protagonist - Without the brain all is nothing -- Chapter 8. Is it possible to simulate "thought"?

The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and - if possible - considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain) Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet's classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight.

ISBN: 9783030710408

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

532901
Cognitive neuroscience.

LC Class. No.: QP360.5 / .B46 2021

Dewey Class. No.: 612.8233

Discussing cognitive neuroscience = psychology, neurophysiology, and philosophy on the mind, body and brain /
LDR:02836nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2240319
003 DE-He213
005 20210521171937.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 211111s2021 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030710408 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030710392 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-71040-8
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a QP360.5 $b .B46 2021
072 7 $a JMR $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY008000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JMR $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 612.8233 $2 23
090 $a QP360.5 $b .B465 2021
100 1 $a Benetka, Gerhard. $3 3307707
245 1 0 $a Discussing cognitive neuroscience $h [electronic resource] : $b psychology, neurophysiology, and philosophy on the mind, body and brain / $c by Gerhard Benetka, Hans Werbik.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2021.
300 $a ix, 171 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Annals of theoretical psychology ; $v v.17
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Critique of neuropsychology - A polemic -- Chapter 2. Living body (Leib) or physical dataset? Antonio Damsio's and Thomas Fuchs's holistic conception of the human being as opposite standpoint to reductionist models -- Chapter 3. The person and the brain -- Chapter 4. The neuropsychological discourse in philosophical critique - Bennett/Hacker and the consequences -- Chapter 5. Persistent biologism and the misuse of neuropsychology - an activity-theoretical contribution -- Chapter 6. Measuring free will with the readiness potential? New data on an old misunderstanding -- Chapter 7. The brain as protagonist - Without the brain all is nothing -- Chapter 8. Is it possible to simulate "thought"?
520 $a The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and - if possible - considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain) Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet's classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight.
650 0 $a Cognitive neuroscience. $3 532901
650 1 4 $a Cognitive Psychology. $3 891220
650 2 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 588700
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 894953
650 2 4 $a Psychology, general. $3 894961
650 2 4 $a Cross Cultural Psychology. $3 894972
700 1 $a Werbik, Hans. $3 3495163
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Annals of theoretical psychology ; $v v.17. $3 3495164
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-41168)