東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Democratic decision-making = consens...

Emerson, Peter.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Democratic decision-making = consensus voting for civic society and parliaments /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Democratic decision-making/ by Peter Emerson.
Reminder of title:	consensus voting for civic society and parliaments /
Author:	Emerson, Peter.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2021.,
Description:	xxix, 99 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	The Problem -- Decision-making -- The A-B-C-D of Voting -- Consensus Voting -- The Consequences of Consequences -- Comparing Decision-making Voting Procedures -- Comparing Electoral Systems.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Preferential ballot. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52808-9
ISBN:	9783030528089

Democratic decision-making = consensus voting for civic society and parliaments /
Emerson, Peter.

Democratic decision-makingconsensus voting for civic society and parliaments /[electronic resource] :by Peter Emerson. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2021. - xxix, 99 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in political science,2191-5466. - SpringerBriefs in political science..

The Problem -- Decision-making -- The A-B-C-D of Voting -- Consensus Voting -- The Consequences of Consequences -- Comparing Decision-making Voting Procedures -- Comparing Electoral Systems.

This book provides a practical guide to how groups of people, everywhere, from the local village council to the United Nations Security Council, can best make collective decisions. By comparing the many voting procedures used in democratic decision-making, it explains why win-or-lose binary voting can be inaccurate and divisive, while the more inclusive preferential points system of voting can be so much more accurate and, therefore, more democratic; indeed, it is a win-win methodology. The text, essential reading for anyone interested in fair and participatory collective decision-making, also compares the most common electoral systems.

ISBN: 9783030528089

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-52808-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3443524
Preferential ballot.

LC Class. No.: JF1071 / .E44 2021

Dewey Class. No.: 328.3347

Democratic decision-making = consensus voting for civic society and parliaments /
LDR:01924nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2235828
003 DE-He213
005 20200922150618.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 211111s2021 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030528089 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030528072 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-52808-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-52808-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a JF1071 $b .E44 2021
072 7 $a JPHF $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL007000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPHF $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 328.3347 $2 23
090 $a JF1071 $b .E53 2021
100 1 $a Emerson, Peter. $3 582415
245 1 0 $a Democratic decision-making $h [electronic resource] : $b consensus voting for civic society and parliaments / $c by Peter Emerson.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2021.
300 $a xxix, 99 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in political science, $x 2191-5466
505 0 $a The Problem -- Decision-making -- The A-B-C-D of Voting -- Consensus Voting -- The Consequences of Consequences -- Comparing Decision-making Voting Procedures -- Comparing Electoral Systems.
520 $a This book provides a practical guide to how groups of people, everywhere, from the local village council to the United Nations Security Council, can best make collective decisions. By comparing the many voting procedures used in democratic decision-making, it explains why win-or-lose binary voting can be inaccurate and divisive, while the more inclusive preferential points system of voting can be so much more accurate and, therefore, more democratic; indeed, it is a win-win methodology. The text, essential reading for anyone interested in fair and participatory collective decision-making, also compares the most common electoral systems.
650 0 $a Preferential ballot. $3 3443524
650 0 $a Democracy. $3 519163
650 0 $a Consensus (Social sciences) $3 580911
650 1 4 $a Electoral Politics. $3 2182104
650 2 4 $a Microeconomics. $3 549163
650 2 4 $a Comparative Politics. $3 1566074
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in political science. $3 1567961
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52808-9
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)