東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The securitisation of news in Turkey...

Martin, Natalie.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The securitisation of news in Turkey = journalists as terrorists? /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The securitisation of news in Turkey/ by Natalie Martin.
其他題名:	journalists as terrorists? /
作者:	Martin, Natalie.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2020.,
面頁冊數:	xi, 134 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. The securitisation of journalism in Turkey: how and why -- Chapter 3. Pre-AKP: Press freedom in Turkey -- Chapter 4. Post AKP: Press freedom and the Kemalist "Guardian State" -- Chapter 5. Post AKP: Press freedom and the Kurdish issue -- Chapter 6. Post AKP: Press freedom and the Gulen movement -- Chapter 7. Journalists as terrorists - the discursive road to an authoritarian state -- Chapter 8. Conclusion.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Government and the press - Turkey. -
標題:	Turkey - Politics and government - 21st century. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49381-3
ISBN:	9783030493813

The securitisation of news in Turkey = journalists as terrorists? /
Martin, Natalie.

The securitisation of news in Turkeyjournalists as terrorists? /[electronic resource] :by Natalie Martin. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - xi, 134 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - The Palgrave Macmillan series in international political communication. - Palgrave Macmillan series in international political communication..

Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. The securitisation of journalism in Turkey: how and why -- Chapter 3. Pre-AKP: Press freedom in Turkey -- Chapter 4. Post AKP: Press freedom and the Kemalist "Guardian State" -- Chapter 5. Post AKP: Press freedom and the Kurdish issue -- Chapter 6. Post AKP: Press freedom and the Gulen movement -- Chapter 7. Journalists as terrorists - the discursive road to an authoritarian state -- Chapter 8. Conclusion.

This book examines why Turkey has become infamous as a repressor of news media freedom. For the past decade or so it has stood alongside China as a notorious jailer of journalists - at the same time as being a candidate state of the EU. The author argues that the reasons for this conundrum are complex and whilst the AKP is responsible for the most recent illiberality, its actions should be taken in the wider context of Turkish politics - and the three way battle for power which has been raging between Kemalists, Kurds and Islamists since the republic was founded in 1923. The AKP are the current winners of this tripartite power struggle and the securitisation of journalists as terrorists is part of that quest. Moreover, whilst securitisation is not new, it has intensified recently as the number of the AKP's political opponents has proliferated. Securitisation is also a means of delegitimising journalism - and neutralizing any threat to the AKP's electoral prospects - whilst maintaining a democratic facade on the world stage. Lastly, the book argues that whilst the AKP's securitisation of news began as a means of quashing the reporting of illiberality against wider political targets, since 2016 it has become a target in its own right. In the battle for power in Turkey, journalism is now one of the many losers. Natalie Martin was a BBC journalist who went back to academia in 2007 to do a PhD at Loughborough University on the Turkey-EU accession process 1999-2004. She is now Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Nottingham, UK, and has published widely on issues surrounding Turkey and the EU.

ISBN: 9783030493813

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-49381-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3461873
Government and the press
--Turkey.Subjects--Geographical Terms:

3221035
Turkey
--Politics and government--21st century.

LC Class. No.: PN4748.T9 / M378 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 079.561

The securitisation of news in Turkey = journalists as terrorists? /
LDR:03227nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2222803
003 DE-He213
005 20201126150756.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 210108s2020 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030493813 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030493806 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-49381-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-49381-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a PN4748.T9 $b M378 2020
072 7 $a JP $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL058000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JP $x 1D $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 079.561 $2 23
090 $a PN4748.T9 $b M379 2020
100 1 $a Martin, Natalie. $3 3461872
245 1 4 $a The securitisation of news in Turkey $h [electronic resource] : $b journalists as terrorists? / $c by Natalie Martin.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2020.
300 $a xi, 134 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a The Palgrave Macmillan series in international political communication
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. The securitisation of journalism in Turkey: how and why -- Chapter 3. Pre-AKP: Press freedom in Turkey -- Chapter 4. Post AKP: Press freedom and the Kemalist "Guardian State" -- Chapter 5. Post AKP: Press freedom and the Kurdish issue -- Chapter 6. Post AKP: Press freedom and the Gulen movement -- Chapter 7. Journalists as terrorists - the discursive road to an authoritarian state -- Chapter 8. Conclusion.
520 $a This book examines why Turkey has become infamous as a repressor of news media freedom. For the past decade or so it has stood alongside China as a notorious jailer of journalists - at the same time as being a candidate state of the EU. The author argues that the reasons for this conundrum are complex and whilst the AKP is responsible for the most recent illiberality, its actions should be taken in the wider context of Turkish politics - and the three way battle for power which has been raging between Kemalists, Kurds and Islamists since the republic was founded in 1923. The AKP are the current winners of this tripartite power struggle and the securitisation of journalists as terrorists is part of that quest. Moreover, whilst securitisation is not new, it has intensified recently as the number of the AKP's political opponents has proliferated. Securitisation is also a means of delegitimising journalism - and neutralizing any threat to the AKP's electoral prospects - whilst maintaining a democratic facade on the world stage. Lastly, the book argues that whilst the AKP's securitisation of news began as a means of quashing the reporting of illiberality against wider political targets, since 2016 it has become a target in its own right. In the battle for power in Turkey, journalism is now one of the many losers. Natalie Martin was a BBC journalist who went back to academia in 2007 to do a PhD at Loughborough University on the Turkey-EU accession process 1999-2004. She is now Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Nottingham, UK, and has published widely on issues surrounding Turkey and the EU.
650 0 $a Government and the press $z Turkey. $3 3461873
650 0 $a Journalism $x Political aspects $z Turkey. $3 3461874
650 0 $a Journalists $x Legal status, laws, etc. $z Turkey. $3 3461875
650 1 4 $a European Politics. $3 2187112
650 2 4 $a Political Communication. $3 2055990
650 2 4 $a Journalism. $3 576107
650 2 4 $a International Organization. $3 644056
650 2 4 $a Terrorism and Political Violence. $3 2182328
651 0 $a Turkey $x Politics and government $y 21st century. $3 3221035
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Palgrave Macmillan series in international political communication. $3 1099451
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49381-3
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)