東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Paradigm shift of education governan...

Wang, Yan.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Paradigm shift of education governance in China = two compulsory education legislation episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Paradigm shift of education governance in China/ by Yan Wang.
Reminder of title:	two compulsory education legislation episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /
Author:	Wang, Yan.
Published:	Berlin, Heidelberg :Springer Berlin Heidelberg : : 2019.,
Description:	xvii, 159 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Introduction -- Chapter 1 Evoluaiton of Basic Education in China -- Chapter 2 Collecting and Tackling Data -- Chapter 3 Reflecting on Theoretical Context -- Chapter 4 Episode I: The 1986 Legislation -- Chapter 5 Episode II: The 2006 Legislation -- Chapter 6 Analysing The Two Legislation Episodes -- Chapter 7 Paradigm Shif of Education Governance.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Educational law and legislation - China. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59515-2
ISBN:	9783662595152

Paradigm shift of education governance in China = two compulsory education legislation episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /
Wang, Yan.

Paradigm shift of education governance in Chinatwo compulsory education legislation episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /[electronic resource] :by Yan Wang. - Berlin, Heidelberg :Springer Berlin Heidelberg :2019. - xvii, 159 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Introduction -- Chapter 1 Evoluaiton of Basic Education in China -- Chapter 2 Collecting and Tackling Data -- Chapter 3 Reflecting on Theoretical Context -- Chapter 4 Episode I: The 1986 Legislation -- Chapter 5 Episode II: The 2006 Legislation -- Chapter 6 Analysing The Two Legislation Episodes -- Chapter 7 Paradigm Shif of Education Governance.

The book addresses the paradigm shift in education governance in China through a study of two legislation episodes in China: the 1986 Compulsory Education Law and the 2006 Compulsory Education Law Amendment. The research began with two broad questions: how was the Compulsory Education Law made and amended? Why was it made and amended? Using ethnographic interviews and documentary analysis as the main research methods, more specific questions on both legislative processes were delved into as the research evolved: What were the driving forces behind the 1986 and 2006 legislation? What values of compulsory education were assumed in their central decisions? What was the institutional rationale underpinning them? Data was collected through ethnographic interviews with key informants involved in the policymaking process. The research findings were analyzed and presented on the basis of narration analysis. The policymaking process of the legislation was then analyzed from three paradigms: agenda-setting, decision-making and organizational behavior. Finally, by examining the results of the previous stages of analysis, and further comparing the two cases, the research arrived at a theoretical framework for education governance that embraces three essential elements: political ideology, perceived value of education, and institutional rationale. A thorough analysis of the two legislative processes identified that the political ideology - which shifted from efficiency-oriented economic well-being to equity-oriented social cohesion - steered the agenda-setting of the compulsory education legislation. The perceived value of education reflects the role that education plays in development, changing from economic value to social value. The institutional rationale essentially determines strategies by which compulsory education materializes, with a variance from governing by goal and mobilization to governing by accountability and regulation. In conclusion, education governance in China witnessed a paradigm shift from "economic instrumentalism" to "social rationalism" between mid-1980s and 2006.

ISBN: 9783662595152

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-662-59515-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3453795
Educational law and legislation
--China.

LC Class. No.: KNQ3138 / .W364 2019

Dewey Class. No.: 344.5107

Paradigm shift of education governance in China = two compulsory education legislation episodes: 1986 vs 2006 /
LDR:03483nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2218943
003 DE-He213
005 20200120161421.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 201126s2019 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783662595152 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783662595138 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-662-59515-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-662-59515-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KNQ3138 $b .W364 2019
072 7 $a JNF $2 bicssc
072 7 $a EDU034000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JNF $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 344.5107 $2 23
090 $a KNQ3138 $b .W246 2019
100 1 $a Wang, Yan. $3 1021976
245 1 0 $a Paradigm shift of education governance in China $h [electronic resource] : $b two compulsory education legislation episodes: 1986 vs 2006 / $c by Yan Wang.
260 $a Berlin, Heidelberg : $b Springer Berlin Heidelberg : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a xvii, 159 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Introduction -- Chapter 1 Evoluaiton of Basic Education in China -- Chapter 2 Collecting and Tackling Data -- Chapter 3 Reflecting on Theoretical Context -- Chapter 4 Episode I: The 1986 Legislation -- Chapter 5 Episode II: The 2006 Legislation -- Chapter 6 Analysing The Two Legislation Episodes -- Chapter 7 Paradigm Shif of Education Governance.
520 $a The book addresses the paradigm shift in education governance in China through a study of two legislation episodes in China: the 1986 Compulsory Education Law and the 2006 Compulsory Education Law Amendment. The research began with two broad questions: how was the Compulsory Education Law made and amended? Why was it made and amended? Using ethnographic interviews and documentary analysis as the main research methods, more specific questions on both legislative processes were delved into as the research evolved: What were the driving forces behind the 1986 and 2006 legislation? What values of compulsory education were assumed in their central decisions? What was the institutional rationale underpinning them? Data was collected through ethnographic interviews with key informants involved in the policymaking process. The research findings were analyzed and presented on the basis of narration analysis. The policymaking process of the legislation was then analyzed from three paradigms: agenda-setting, decision-making and organizational behavior. Finally, by examining the results of the previous stages of analysis, and further comparing the two cases, the research arrived at a theoretical framework for education governance that embraces three essential elements: political ideology, perceived value of education, and institutional rationale. A thorough analysis of the two legislative processes identified that the political ideology - which shifted from efficiency-oriented economic well-being to equity-oriented social cohesion - steered the agenda-setting of the compulsory education legislation. The perceived value of education reflects the role that education plays in development, changing from economic value to social value. The institutional rationale essentially determines strategies by which compulsory education materializes, with a variance from governing by goal and mobilization to governing by accountability and regulation. In conclusion, education governance in China witnessed a paradigm shift from "economic instrumentalism" to "social rationalism" between mid-1980s and 2006.
650 0 $a Educational law and legislation $z China. $3 3453795
650 0 $a Education and state $z China. $3 526390
650 1 4 $a Educational Policy and Politics. $3 927935
650 2 4 $a Political Science. $3 895291
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59515-2
950 $a Education (Springer-41171)