東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Congressional constraint and judicia...

Tecklenburg, H. Chris.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Congressional constraint and judicial responses = examining judiciary committee court curbing and court structuring bills /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Congressional constraint and judicial responses/ by H. Chris Tecklenburg.
Reminder of title:	examining judiciary committee court curbing and court structuring bills /
Author:	Tecklenburg, H. Chris.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2020.,
Description:	xii, 120 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	1. An Introduction to Separation of Powers and Bicameralism -- 2. Reported Court Curbing and Administrative Court Curbing Legislation -- 3. Reported Court Structuring Bills -- 4. Judicial Responses -- 5. Conclusions Involving the Relationship between Congress and the Courts.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Judicial power - United States. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44379-5
ISBN:	9783030443795

Congressional constraint and judicial responses = examining judiciary committee court curbing and court structuring bills /
Tecklenburg, H. Chris.

Congressional constraint and judicial responsesexamining judiciary committee court curbing and court structuring bills /[electronic resource] :by H. Chris Tecklenburg. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - xii, 120 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. An Introduction to Separation of Powers and Bicameralism -- 2. Reported Court Curbing and Administrative Court Curbing Legislation -- 3. Reported Court Structuring Bills -- 4. Judicial Responses -- 5. Conclusions Involving the Relationship between Congress and the Courts.

"This book provides a novel description of conflict between the Congress and the US Supreme Court. Tecklenburg's perspective on legislative constraints on the judiciary breathes fresh air into an important and timely topic. At a time when high-stakes conflict among our national institutions is politically and socially salient, this book will be essential reading." -Tom Clark, Charles Howard Candler Professor of Political Science, Emory University, USA This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability, and judicial review. Unlike prior works, this book examines this relationship from a bicameral perspective, as it is argued that there are different motivations and reasons as to why and how each chamber of Congress approaches its relationship with the federal judiciary. In addition, this book considers the role of the judiciary committee in the legislative process, as bills that were reported out of committee are examined. Several possible causes of this legislative activity and judicial responses are analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary. H. Chris Tecklenburg is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science and International Studies department at Georgia Southern University, USA.

ISBN: 9783030443795

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-44379-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

765534
Judicial power
--United States.

LC Class. No.: KF5130 / .T43 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 347.7312

Congressional constraint and judicial responses = examining judiciary committee court curbing and court structuring bills /
LDR:02991nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2218024
003 DE-He213
005 20200421080307.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 201120s2020 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030443795 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030380830 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-44379-5 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-44379-5
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KF5130 $b .T43 2020
072 7 $a JP $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL040000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JP $x 1KBB $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 347.7312 $2 23
090 $a KF5130 $b .T255 2020
100 1 $a Tecklenburg, H. Chris. $3 3451720
245 1 0 $a Congressional constraint and judicial responses $h [electronic resource] : $b examining judiciary committee court curbing and court structuring bills / $c by H. Chris Tecklenburg.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Pivot, $c 2020.
300 $a xii, 120 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. An Introduction to Separation of Powers and Bicameralism -- 2. Reported Court Curbing and Administrative Court Curbing Legislation -- 3. Reported Court Structuring Bills -- 4. Judicial Responses -- 5. Conclusions Involving the Relationship between Congress and the Courts.
520 $a "This book provides a novel description of conflict between the Congress and the US Supreme Court. Tecklenburg's perspective on legislative constraints on the judiciary breathes fresh air into an important and timely topic. At a time when high-stakes conflict among our national institutions is politically and socially salient, this book will be essential reading." -Tom Clark, Charles Howard Candler Professor of Political Science, Emory University, USA This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability, and judicial review. Unlike prior works, this book examines this relationship from a bicameral perspective, as it is argued that there are different motivations and reasons as to why and how each chamber of Congress approaches its relationship with the federal judiciary. In addition, this book considers the role of the judiciary committee in the legislative process, as bills that were reported out of committee are examined. Several possible causes of this legislative activity and judicial responses are analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary. H. Chris Tecklenburg is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science and International Studies department at Georgia Southern University, USA.
650 0 $a Judicial power $z United States. $3 765534
650 1 4 $a US Politics. $3 2182240
650 2 4 $a Legislative and Executive Politics. $3 3219859
650 2 4 $a Public Law. $3 897067
650 2 4 $a Governance and Government. $3 3220859
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44379-5
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (Springer-41174)