東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Factors that Influence Selection of ...

LIdster, William W.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Factors that Influence Selection of Frameworks for Information Security Program Management: A Correlational Study.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Factors that Influence Selection of Frameworks for Information Security Program Management: A Correlational Study./
Author:	LIdster, William W.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	157 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-07B.
Subject:	Information Technology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13424640
ISBN:	9780438776982

Factors that Influence Selection of Frameworks for Information Security Program Management: A Correlational Study.
LIdster, William W.

Factors that Influence Selection of Frameworks for Information Security Program Management: A Correlational Study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 157 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This study examines what factors explain which framework information security professionals intend to, or actually adopt to manage their information security program. The importance of effective security management is significant in today's dynamic cyber threat environment, and no academic study has examined what leads to the adoption of one framework over another. This study leverages the Unified Theory of the Acceptance and Use of Technology as the theoretical foundation, which resulted in these five research questions. First, to what extent does performance expectancy explain which framework information security professionals intend to adopt to manage their information security program? Next, to what extent does effort expectancy explain which framework information security professionals intend to adopt to manage their information security program? Third, to what extent does social influence explain which framework information security professionals intend to adopt to manage their information security program? Fourth, to what extent does facilitating conditions explain which framework information security professionals actually adopt to manage their information security program? Finally, to what extent does behavioral intent influence which framework information security professionals actually adopt to manage their information security program? This study uses a non-experimental, correlational, quantitative research approach which UTAUT constructs are significant predictors towards an information security leader's intention to adopt, or actual adoption of, a particular framework. The population of this study consists of information security leaders with authority to select their organization's security framework for medium-to-large enterprises. The study surveyed a total sample size of 398 from this population to collect the needed data. The analysis determined that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence were significant predictors of the behavioral intention to use a framework, but did not find any significant predictors to the actual use of a framework. Analysis of the data suggests that the notable number of respondents who indicated that their organization mandated the use of a particular framework may have been a contributor to the lack of finding a significant predictor to actual use. A low explanation of variance also indicated that the original UTAUT model might not be effective for addressing the omnibus research question.

ISBN: 9780438776982Subjects--Topical Terms:

1030799
Information Technology.

Factors that Influence Selection of Frameworks for Information Security Program Management: A Correlational Study.
LDR:03585nmm a2200313 4500 001 2209029
005 20191025102636.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438776982
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13424640
035 $a (MiAaPQ)capella:20678
035 $a AAI13424640
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a LIdster, William W. $3 3436111
245 1 0 $a Factors that Influence Selection of Frameworks for Information Security Program Management: A Correlational Study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 157 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Rahman, Shawon.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study examines what factors explain which framework information security professionals intend to, or actually adopt to manage their information security program. The importance of effective security management is significant in today's dynamic cyber threat environment, and no academic study has examined what leads to the adoption of one framework over another. This study leverages the Unified Theory of the Acceptance and Use of Technology as the theoretical foundation, which resulted in these five research questions. First, to what extent does performance expectancy explain which framework information security professionals intend to adopt to manage their information security program? Next, to what extent does effort expectancy explain which framework information security professionals intend to adopt to manage their information security program? Third, to what extent does social influence explain which framework information security professionals intend to adopt to manage their information security program? Fourth, to what extent does facilitating conditions explain which framework information security professionals actually adopt to manage their information security program? Finally, to what extent does behavioral intent influence which framework information security professionals actually adopt to manage their information security program? This study uses a non-experimental, correlational, quantitative research approach which UTAUT constructs are significant predictors towards an information security leader's intention to adopt, or actual adoption of, a particular framework. The population of this study consists of information security leaders with authority to select their organization's security framework for medium-to-large enterprises. The study surveyed a total sample size of 398 from this population to collect the needed data. The analysis determined that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence were significant predictors of the behavioral intention to use a framework, but did not find any significant predictors to the actual use of a framework. Analysis of the data suggests that the notable number of respondents who indicated that their organization mandated the use of a particular framework may have been a contributor to the lack of finding a significant predictor to actual use. A low explanation of variance also indicated that the original UTAUT model might not be effective for addressing the omnibus research question.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Information Technology. $3 1030799
690 $a 0489
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Business and Technology. $3 1673949
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-07B.
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13424640