東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The First Line of Defense: Higher Ed...

Ponte, Dana Adrienne.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The First Line of Defense: Higher Education in Wartime and the Development of National Defense Education, 1939-1959.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The First Line of Defense: Higher Education in Wartime and the Development of National Defense Education, 1939-1959./
Author:	Ponte, Dana Adrienne.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	207 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International78-09A.
Subject:	Military history. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10252045
ISBN:	9781369652963

The First Line of Defense: Higher Education in Wartime and the Development of National Defense Education, 1939-1959.
Ponte, Dana Adrienne.

The First Line of Defense: Higher Education in Wartime and the Development of National Defense Education, 1939-1959. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 207 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

This study posits that the National Defense Education Act of 1958 (NDEA) represented the culmination of nearly a century-long process through which education was linked to national defense in periods of wartime, and later retained a strategic utility for defense purposes in times of peace. That a defense rationale for federal support of public higher education achieved a staying power that outlasted moments of temporary strategic necessity is due in large part to the efforts of individuals in the education and policymaking communities who were able to envision and promote a lasting, expansive definition of education for national defense - one that would effectively marshal federal funding for decades to come. In the latter half of the 20th century, it was precisely this definition that provided the rationale for further federal forays into public education in the United States, accumulating into a level of involvement that now feels commonplace. Despite its present predominance, however, this relationship was by no means a foregone conclusion in the early decades of the 20th century. The United States has historically been defined by its constitutional separation of federal and state powers, notably made manifest in a traditional emphasis on state control over public education. Each crossing of this boundary is driven by a conceptual shift that makes such transcendence possible. When the relationship of higher education to the federal government is viewed in this context, a question naturally arises - that of how the federal government has come to be involved in higher education, and under what rationales. A longstanding tradition of large-scale federal education legislation arising in wartime, and accompanying surges of federal investment in higher education, suggests that concerns of national defense provide a compelling rationale for federal involvement in public education at all levels, despite historical and even Constitutional considerations that urge a state, rather than a federal, approach. The process by which education, and particularly higher education, was paired with national defense, on a conceptual and on the level of federal policy in the two decades prior to the passage of the NDEA is the focus of this study. As a window onto this process, this study has implications for our historical understanding of the experience of the higher education enterprise in wartime, and of the evolving relationship between the federal government and the nation's colleges and universities in the interests of national defense and security.

ISBN: 9781369652963Subjects--Topical Terms:

552332
Military history.

The First Line of Defense: Higher Education in Wartime and the Development of National Defense Education, 1939-1959.
LDR:03775nmm a2200337 4500 001 2208630
005 20191028072724.5
008 201008s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369652963
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10252045
035 $a (MiAaPQ)washington:16770
035 $a AAI10252045
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ponte, Dana Adrienne. $3 3435672
245 1 0 $a The First Line of Defense: Higher Education in Wartime and the Development of National Defense Education, 1939-1959.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 207 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Nerad, Maresi.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study posits that the National Defense Education Act of 1958 (NDEA) represented the culmination of nearly a century-long process through which education was linked to national defense in periods of wartime, and later retained a strategic utility for defense purposes in times of peace. That a defense rationale for federal support of public higher education achieved a staying power that outlasted moments of temporary strategic necessity is due in large part to the efforts of individuals in the education and policymaking communities who were able to envision and promote a lasting, expansive definition of education for national defense - one that would effectively marshal federal funding for decades to come. In the latter half of the 20th century, it was precisely this definition that provided the rationale for further federal forays into public education in the United States, accumulating into a level of involvement that now feels commonplace. Despite its present predominance, however, this relationship was by no means a foregone conclusion in the early decades of the 20th century. The United States has historically been defined by its constitutional separation of federal and state powers, notably made manifest in a traditional emphasis on state control over public education. Each crossing of this boundary is driven by a conceptual shift that makes such transcendence possible. When the relationship of higher education to the federal government is viewed in this context, a question naturally arises - that of how the federal government has come to be involved in higher education, and under what rationales. A longstanding tradition of large-scale federal education legislation arising in wartime, and accompanying surges of federal investment in higher education, suggests that concerns of national defense provide a compelling rationale for federal involvement in public education at all levels, despite historical and even Constitutional considerations that urge a state, rather than a federal, approach. The process by which education, and particularly higher education, was paired with national defense, on a conceptual and on the level of federal policy in the two decades prior to the passage of the NDEA is the focus of this study. As a window onto this process, this study has implications for our historical understanding of the experience of the higher education enterprise in wartime, and of the evolving relationship between the federal government and the nation's colleges and universities in the interests of national defense and security.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Military history. $3 552332
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
690 $a 0722
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Education - Seattle. $3 2049919
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 78-09A.
790 $a 0250
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10252045