語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Why Health Information Is Hard to Re...
~
Morales, Miraida.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Why Health Information Is Hard to Read: A Mixed Methods Study Investigating the Readability of Health Information.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Why Health Information Is Hard to Read: A Mixed Methods Study Investigating the Readability of Health Information./
作者:
Morales, Miraida.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:
211 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International80-12A.
標題:
Library science. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13422571
ISBN:
9781392221822
Why Health Information Is Hard to Read: A Mixed Methods Study Investigating the Readability of Health Information.
Morales, Miraida.
Why Health Information Is Hard to Read: A Mixed Methods Study Investigating the Readability of Health Information.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 211 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies, 2019.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
To investigate how readability affects the way adults who are learning to read evaluate health information, a mixed methods research study was designed based on a sociotechnical framework and using theories of everyday life information seeking. The study analyzed a corpus of consumer health information documents (N = 501) using the CohMetrix text analysis tool (McNamara, Graesser, McCarthy & Cai, 2014) and a set of NLP-based tools developed by Educational Testing Service (ETS) called SourceRater and Language Muse® to identify specific linguistic features that contribute to readability. In this study, these tools were used to assess the difficulty of reading health information. In the next phase of the study, adults who are learning to read (N = 20) assessed the readability of the documents in the corpus as part of a usability study. The study found that the documents' low narrativity, limited concept and word overlap, and low cohesion contribute to the difficulty of reading health information for adults who are learning to read. It also identified differences in perceptions of reading difficulty among adults who are learning to read. The findings highlight the limitations of current health literacy guidelines and of using readability formulas like the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula to determine the readability of consumer health information, and questions the reliability of "Easy to Read" health information collections. Health information documents that are easier to read can improve access to health information that supports and addresses the needs of communities with poor health outcomes, including adults who are learning to read.
ISBN: 9781392221822Subjects--Topical Terms:
539284
Library science.
Why Health Information Is Hard to Read: A Mixed Methods Study Investigating the Readability of Health Information.
LDR
:02846nmm a2200337 4500
001
2207856
005
20190923114242.5
008
201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781392221822
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI13422571
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)gsnb.rutgers:10026
035
$a
AAI13422571
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Morales, Miraida.
$3
3434857
245
1 0
$a
Why Health Information Is Hard to Read: A Mixed Methods Study Investigating the Readability of Health Information.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2019
300
$a
211 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
500
$a
Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500
$a
Advisor: Wacholder, Nina.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies, 2019.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
To investigate how readability affects the way adults who are learning to read evaluate health information, a mixed methods research study was designed based on a sociotechnical framework and using theories of everyday life information seeking. The study analyzed a corpus of consumer health information documents (N = 501) using the CohMetrix text analysis tool (McNamara, Graesser, McCarthy & Cai, 2014) and a set of NLP-based tools developed by Educational Testing Service (ETS) called SourceRater and Language Muse® to identify specific linguistic features that contribute to readability. In this study, these tools were used to assess the difficulty of reading health information. In the next phase of the study, adults who are learning to read (N = 20) assessed the readability of the documents in the corpus as part of a usability study. The study found that the documents' low narrativity, limited concept and word overlap, and low cohesion contribute to the difficulty of reading health information for adults who are learning to read. It also identified differences in perceptions of reading difficulty among adults who are learning to read. The findings highlight the limitations of current health literacy guidelines and of using readability formulas like the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula to determine the readability of consumer health information, and questions the reliability of "Easy to Read" health information collections. Health information documents that are easier to read can improve access to health information that supports and addresses the needs of communities with poor health outcomes, including adults who are learning to read.
590
$a
School code: 0190.
650
4
$a
Library science.
$3
539284
650
4
$a
Public Health Education.
$3
3432608
650
4
$a
Information science.
$3
554358
690
$a
0399
690
$a
0500
690
$a
0723
710
2
$a
Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies.
$b
Communication, Information and Library Studies.
$3
3429847
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
80-12A.
790
$a
0190
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2019
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13422571
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9384405
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入