東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Technology Assessment Model of Devel...

Alshereef, Ahmed Shebab.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Technology Assessment Model of Developing Geothermal Energy Resources for Supporting Electrical System: The Case for Oregon.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Technology Assessment Model of Developing Geothermal Energy Resources for Supporting Electrical System: The Case for Oregon./
作者:	Alshereef, Ahmed Shebab.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	212 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International78-10.
標題:	Alternative Energy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10257628
ISBN:	9781369703849

Technology Assessment Model of Developing Geothermal Energy Resources for Supporting Electrical System: The Case for Oregon.
Alshereef, Ahmed Shebab.

Technology Assessment Model of Developing Geothermal Energy Resources for Supporting Electrical System: The Case for Oregon. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 212 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10.

Thesis (M.S.)--Portland State University, 2017.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The demand for energy is increasing worldwide. All applications contributed to increase the demand of all energy industry, and therefore the effect on the environment and the rise in pollution increased significantly. This is considered a large problem, and researchers focused their research on renewable energy for reducing the cost of energy in the future. Geothermal energy has significant impact as a source of electricity generation since it will not harm the environment. There are more than twenty countries that benefit from geothermal plants, which generate more than 6000 megawatts. Three alternatives of geothermal energy technology (GHP, Direct use of Geothermal Heat, and Geothermal Electricity) can be used for supporting electrical systems in Oregon. At the same time, the success of using the geothermal energy alternatives in Oregon relies on different goals for achieving the best geothermal development. Oregon has been ranked third in the potential use of geothermal energy after Nevada and California. The objective from the research study was to develop an assessment model framework that can be used for supporting cost effective renewable energy in Oregon by the development of geothermal energy sources. This research of study was done by using the Hierarchical Decision Model (HDM) and consisted of four levels: Mission, objectives, goals, and alternative. Criteria used in this research study are based on five objectives to know what are the most important factors in the decision-making process. These objectives are: social, environmental, economical, technical, and political. The decision model connected objectives, goals, and alternative for obtaining the accurate decision. HDM used for this purpose to analyze the result of data collected from experts. Seven experts who had experience in the geothermal field participated in this research study, and they gave their judgment in the questionnaire survey link by using pair-wise comparison method. The outcome analysis of the results showed that in terms of objectives that Minimizing Environmental Impact was rated at the highest value at 0.26 with respect to the mission. Within the category of Minimizing Environmental Impact, Seismic Activity and GHG Emissions had higher values. The results show that "Geothermal Electricity", with a rating of 43%, was ranked as the most important alternative with respect to mission, objectives, and goals. "Direct Use of Geothermal Heat" was ranked as the second most important alternative with 31%. The results of this research study were discussed with the experts to get their feedback, and learn from them what requirements are necessary for improvement in the geotechnical energy sector for future research. The experts agreed that this methodology is a good approach to help reach the right decision since this methodology (HDM) divides the problem into small sets, which will make the decision process easier.

ISBN: 9781369703849Subjects--Topical Terms:

1035473
Alternative Energy.

Technology Assessment Model of Developing Geothermal Energy Resources for Supporting Electrical System: The Case for Oregon.
LDR:04079nmm a2200349 4500 001 2207460
005 20190920131230.5
008 201008s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369703849
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10257628
035 $a (MiAaPQ)psu:11753
035 $a AAI10257628
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Alshereef, Ahmed Shebab. $3 3434449
245 1 0 $a Technology Assessment Model of Developing Geothermal Energy Resources for Supporting Electrical System: The Case for Oregon.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 212 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Daim, Tugrul U.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Portland State University, 2017.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The demand for energy is increasing worldwide. All applications contributed to increase the demand of all energy industry, and therefore the effect on the environment and the rise in pollution increased significantly. This is considered a large problem, and researchers focused their research on renewable energy for reducing the cost of energy in the future. Geothermal energy has significant impact as a source of electricity generation since it will not harm the environment. There are more than twenty countries that benefit from geothermal plants, which generate more than 6000 megawatts. Three alternatives of geothermal energy technology (GHP, Direct use of Geothermal Heat, and Geothermal Electricity) can be used for supporting electrical systems in Oregon. At the same time, the success of using the geothermal energy alternatives in Oregon relies on different goals for achieving the best geothermal development. Oregon has been ranked third in the potential use of geothermal energy after Nevada and California. The objective from the research study was to develop an assessment model framework that can be used for supporting cost effective renewable energy in Oregon by the development of geothermal energy sources. This research of study was done by using the Hierarchical Decision Model (HDM) and consisted of four levels: Mission, objectives, goals, and alternative. Criteria used in this research study are based on five objectives to know what are the most important factors in the decision-making process. These objectives are: social, environmental, economical, technical, and political. The decision model connected objectives, goals, and alternative for obtaining the accurate decision. HDM used for this purpose to analyze the result of data collected from experts. Seven experts who had experience in the geothermal field participated in this research study, and they gave their judgment in the questionnaire survey link by using pair-wise comparison method. The outcome analysis of the results showed that in terms of objectives that Minimizing Environmental Impact was rated at the highest value at 0.26 with respect to the mission. Within the category of Minimizing Environmental Impact, Seismic Activity and GHG Emissions had higher values. The results show that "Geothermal Electricity", with a rating of 43%, was ranked as the most important alternative with respect to mission, objectives, and goals. "Direct Use of Geothermal Heat" was ranked as the second most important alternative with 31%. The results of this research study were discussed with the experts to get their feedback, and learn from them what requirements are necessary for improvement in the geotechnical energy sector for future research. The experts agreed that this methodology is a good approach to help reach the right decision since this methodology (HDM) divides the problem into small sets, which will make the decision process easier.
590 $a School code: 0180.
650 4 $a Alternative Energy. $3 1035473
650 4 $a Electrical engineering. $3 649834
650 4 $a Industrial engineering. $3 526216
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
690 $a 0363
690 $a 0544
690 $a 0546
690 $a 0791
710 2 $a Portland State University. $b Engineering and Technology Management. $3 2096494
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 78-10.
790 $a 0180
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10257628