東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A Comparison of Orthodontic Landmark...

O'Dell, Sean.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Comparison of Orthodontic Landmark Reliability and Validity Between Lateral Cephalograms and Hemifacial Lateral Cephalograms among Orthodontists.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A Comparison of Orthodontic Landmark Reliability and Validity Between Lateral Cephalograms and Hemifacial Lateral Cephalograms among Orthodontists./
Author:	O'Dell, Sean.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	52 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International80-07.
Subject:	Dentistry. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10978798
ISBN:	9780438796768

A Comparison of Orthodontic Landmark Reliability and Validity Between Lateral Cephalograms and Hemifacial Lateral Cephalograms among Orthodontists.
O'Dell, Sean.

A Comparison of Orthodontic Landmark Reliability and Validity Between Lateral Cephalograms and Hemifacial Lateral Cephalograms among Orthodontists. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 52 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Minnesota, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Lateral cephalometric analysis has been an integral component of orthodontic treatment planning. This study explored a novel approach of hemifacial lateral cephalometric landmark analysis comparing reliability and validity to traditional lateral cephalometric landmark analysis derived from three-dimensional radiographs among experienced orthodontists in symmetric patients. The results showed excellent intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability for both methods, however hemifacial lateral cephalometric analysis proved to be an invalid assessment when compared to traditional lateral cephalometric analysis for multiple orthodontic landmarks assessed. Due to the excellent reliability for both methods and poor overall validity of hemifacial lateral cephalometric analysis for multiple landmarks compared to traditional lateral cephalometric analysis, as well as other limitations, it's use as a supplemental diagnostic tool in symmetric patients by experienced orthodontists cannot be supported.

ISBN: 9780438796768Subjects--Topical Terms:

828971
Dentistry.

A Comparison of Orthodontic Landmark Reliability and Validity Between Lateral Cephalograms and Hemifacial Lateral Cephalograms among Orthodontists.
LDR:02089nmm a2200313 4500 001 2207241
005 20190916101807.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438796768
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10978798
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umn:19851
035 $a AAI10978798
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a O'Dell, Sean. $3 3434198
245 1 0 $a A Comparison of Orthodontic Landmark Reliability and Validity Between Lateral Cephalograms and Hemifacial Lateral Cephalograms among Orthodontists.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 52 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Larson, Brent E.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Minnesota, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Lateral cephalometric analysis has been an integral component of orthodontic treatment planning. This study explored a novel approach of hemifacial lateral cephalometric landmark analysis comparing reliability and validity to traditional lateral cephalometric landmark analysis derived from three-dimensional radiographs among experienced orthodontists in symmetric patients. The results showed excellent intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability for both methods, however hemifacial lateral cephalometric analysis proved to be an invalid assessment when compared to traditional lateral cephalometric analysis for multiple orthodontic landmarks assessed. Due to the excellent reliability for both methods and poor overall validity of hemifacial lateral cephalometric analysis for multiple landmarks compared to traditional lateral cephalometric analysis, as well as other limitations, it's use as a supplemental diagnostic tool in symmetric patients by experienced orthodontists cannot be supported.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Dentistry. $3 828971
690 $a 0567
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $b Dentistry. $3 3434199
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 80-07.
790 $a 0130
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10978798