東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Arguing for Access: Everyday Rhetori...

Konrad, Annika.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Arguing for Access: Everyday Rhetorical Labor of Disability.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Arguing for Access: Everyday Rhetorical Labor of Disability./
作者:	Konrad, Annika.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	213 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-05A.
標題:	Disability studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10976528
ISBN:	9780438622159

Arguing for Access: Everyday Rhetorical Labor of Disability.
Konrad, Annika.

Arguing for Access: Everyday Rhetorical Labor of Disability. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 213 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2018.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

Arguing for Access: Everyday Rhetorical Labor of Disability theorizes rhetoric of public engagement from the lived communicative experiences of people who are blind and visually impaired. Through semi-structured rhetorical life history interviews with nineteen people who are blind and visually impaired and rhetorical analysis of first-person narratives produced for a community-writing project, I investigate how people learn and use literate and rhetorical practices for public engagement with disability. The daily, public work of access involves developing and deploying complex verbal and embodied strategies for countering deficit discourses and reconfiguring normative relations to motivate and teach interdependence. I call this daily demand for rhetorical activity everyday rhetorical labor of disability, and I explore how it manifests in three contexts: professional, informational, and social. In professional contexts, my analysis demonstrates how what I call normative workplace commonplaces shape arguments about work and working bodies and construct barriers to access for workers with disabilities. In informational contexts, I show how what I call technological commonplaces shape claims about who uses which technologies, for what purposes, where, when, and how, creating the need for rhetorical labor from users of adaptive tools of information access. In social life, my analysis demonstrates how participants must deploy a rhetorical pedagogy of interdependence to teach non-normative ways of moving and thinking about humanness, responsibility, agency, and community. Taken together, my analysis of participant rhetorical experience in these three contexts reveals real social, emotional, and material consequences of everyday rhetorical labor of disability. Access fatigue, a phenomenon observed in the data, points to the lived consequences of such demands, demonstrating how the constant demand for rhetorical self-invention and pedagogy affects individuals' sense of self and depletes their energy for the rhetorical pursuit of access and inclusion. Ultimately, Arguing for Access provides empirical evidence of the lived consequences of a logic of individual rhetorical responsibility for justice and offers conceptual frameworks for examining other lived rhetorical experiences of difference.

ISBN: 9780438622159Subjects--Topical Terms:

543687
Disability studies.

Arguing for Access: Everyday Rhetorical Labor of Disability.
LDR:03484nmm a2200349 4500 001 2206497
005 20190828120149.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438622159
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10976528
035 $a (MiAaPQ)wisc:15831
035 $a AAI10976528
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Konrad, Annika. $3 3433406
245 1 0 $a Arguing for Access: Everyday Rhetorical Labor of Disability.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 213 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-05, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Young, Morris.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Arguing for Access: Everyday Rhetorical Labor of Disability theorizes rhetoric of public engagement from the lived communicative experiences of people who are blind and visually impaired. Through semi-structured rhetorical life history interviews with nineteen people who are blind and visually impaired and rhetorical analysis of first-person narratives produced for a community-writing project, I investigate how people learn and use literate and rhetorical practices for public engagement with disability. The daily, public work of access involves developing and deploying complex verbal and embodied strategies for countering deficit discourses and reconfiguring normative relations to motivate and teach interdependence. I call this daily demand for rhetorical activity everyday rhetorical labor of disability, and I explore how it manifests in three contexts: professional, informational, and social. In professional contexts, my analysis demonstrates how what I call normative workplace commonplaces shape arguments about work and working bodies and construct barriers to access for workers with disabilities. In informational contexts, I show how what I call technological commonplaces shape claims about who uses which technologies, for what purposes, where, when, and how, creating the need for rhetorical labor from users of adaptive tools of information access. In social life, my analysis demonstrates how participants must deploy a rhetorical pedagogy of interdependence to teach non-normative ways of moving and thinking about humanness, responsibility, agency, and community. Taken together, my analysis of participant rhetorical experience in these three contexts reveals real social, emotional, and material consequences of everyday rhetorical labor of disability. Access fatigue, a phenomenon observed in the data, points to the lived consequences of such demands, demonstrating how the constant demand for rhetorical self-invention and pedagogy affects individuals' sense of self and depletes their energy for the rhetorical pursuit of access and inclusion. Ultimately, Arguing for Access provides empirical evidence of the lived consequences of a logic of individual rhetorical responsibility for justice and offers conceptual frameworks for examining other lived rhetorical experiences of difference.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b English. $3 2049862
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-05A.
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10976528